Message ID | 20200914204441.115488215@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=BuP5=CX=lists.infradead.org=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED99F112E for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5169206DB for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="AaJPkwqU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="FKqpL270"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="3ZJjdClz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5169206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Subject:To:From:Date: Message-Id:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Owner; bh=yxbr15Nis8wlWo8pP/ziPYyT8fAvINf08wqJD8aWJ20=; b=AaJPkwqUt9/BbFYfC1smgV1yr GRzz1tcb9K0lqt+0Uplfnt5ahyQNyfJgYaXum7hF7S+CP/hnExEog5x907QsXX+eptBe5m0j3qcc+ mqJ09ccyqSdPyep7gX4svw1sqNoOlKFJzhO3YtA8yp5MU5pqFAedflqF2cQoOsBHNESZW0sNXtupB ozNpQtQIQnFP1Y8jpRIsKV/ltaNJsW02yL+F8W5Fbd8SfUUbiUsGhKp28ebvbu+MAPHiv8HqB5dzd cEogDGC4OWgKFAdgMdqgs21dhv1Cv6v0eUxkIKtYcsq7MPF+/xcwqnSSfVzJ02PXm7aznii9GHeWE di8YCrXcg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHvM8-0002Js-MZ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:45:44 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kHvLX-000267-RB; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:45:10 +0000 Message-Id: <20200914204441.115488215@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1600116306; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=+wlx0B5bXFGE1ZqmF2GOQz7Vu5f4dOGKH6MLdtZ/des=; b=FKqpL2700K2KI8YRyNg486WotbPXB8OPjTNR7CD6hpf4WOsECuFHsf9Fl7xQ/njOCC4us1 V7/8dgt2Y8Q5bsUgPdX3cx6XhZz7xzGxkW9H08+RkTCs1S3zZRCuJ6BO6NdCa1sGP2ZZpX 3bB1p3j0W8RPnI56xz7EqLgYOttnzUhttUOz6CqCP4LTLNoe43UQ+fBcsmVdaPtzMUWgf2 T1f1tMxghsrPiIICkGbkbj/aNUjRjRxUCjZE6DU4Hd0Nghaw+wzNONpacrfVovmhca4M2C rQnc8p8FaD3ZJfM8rRAgyRFUboeWQsqzuPbUDTsqtxOETbLcX/pUl6ZnCc32nQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1600116306; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=+wlx0B5bXFGE1ZqmF2GOQz7Vu5f4dOGKH6MLdtZ/des=; b=3ZJjdClz5oMHjfFfg9NKeHYyaj0Ejpc30NZ9Tracs4udi2vCXYHDiLEh6EZOsJaUpk6Jwn e+AMA/J0ha4T1+Bg== Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:42:11 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [patch 02/13] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional References: <20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200914_164508_304386_33F0CA79 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.14 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [193.142.43.55 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
preempt: Make preempt count unconditional
|
expand
|
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt @@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ config PREEMPT_RT endchoice config PREEMPT_COUNT - bool + def_bool y config PREEMPTION bool - select PREEMPT_COUNT
The handling of preempt_count() is inconsistent accross kernel configurations. On kernels which have PREEMPT_COUNT=n preempt_disable/enable() and the lock/unlock functions are not affecting the preempt count, only local_bh_disable/enable() and _bh variants of locking, soft interrupt delivery, hard interrupt and NMI context affect it. It's therefore impossible to have a consistent set of checks which provide information about the context in which a function is called. In many cases it makes sense to have seperate functions for seperate contexts, but there are valid reasons to avoid that and handle different calling contexts conditionally. The lack of such indicators which work on all kernel configuratios is a constant source of trouble because developers either do not understand the implications or try to work around this inconsistency in weird ways. Neither seem these issues be catched by reviewers and testing. Recently merged code does: gfp = preemptible() ? GFP_KERNEL : GFP_ATOMIC; Looks obviously correct, except for the fact that preemptible() is unconditionally false for CONFIF_PREEMPT_COUNT=n, i.e. all allocations in that code use GFP_ATOMIC on such kernels. Attempts to make preempt count unconditional and consistent have been rejected in the past with handwaving performance arguments. Freshly conducted benchmarks did not reveal any measurable impact from enabling preempt count unconditionally. On kernels with CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE or CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY the preempt count is only incremented and decremented but the result of the decrement is not tested. Contrary to that enabling CONFIG_PREEMPT which tests the result has a small but measurable impact due to the conditional branch/call. It's about time to make essential functionality of the kernel consistent accross the various preemption models. Enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT unconditionally. Follow up changes will remove the #ifdeffery and remove the config option at the end. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> --- kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)