From patchwork Fri Oct 9 07:59:28 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11825341 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119491580 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C955F21789 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 08:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="s0gjJFP8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="D1VJi6UD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C955F21789 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=uKVJfa/N83dETAE5FuI8AVfmLNxV8LtgSCboM6747h4=; b=s0gjJFP8RQGi4ksW97wVlE3Fs wx+ov0gw1ND9Q/xbB5Pi0004oaZxgT40XMh/cdJA5WxNMqAN92wEN2zhyEMFIyp1z2XA3dqsW9G10 a2d0Y7DeRzJM+yhI6/FKKHX18fhCc7a1acWYplVVi9eQSzrUho8gXvY78LMGqiWpduMhtxFZ8mVXa 0uUBU22qUaxsISEi2bmiuilBIDucEhHUfDXH0mpNiwSxWmWtXj8w2HMonYIZt+pgw5wT6OKNb1XU2 +0b5XBZBe0Z0HpjF0Pn+tsazpLxw0JOq6WmnKQhb+EIlcT4uWGqtY7NKvcBbuoQR/0l1xYd76f6wC VITN8Tbhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQnLu-0003N8-LL; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:02:10 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kQnJx-0002WU-0D for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:00:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id y12so3870240wrp.6 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 01:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=le1GUptU9JjBH114uU563JmUcYegKwYn9xh0zAQdRv8=; b=D1VJi6UDBiQk2hO8dFve4gh+DKwL/4hvYIL5H14t+/WkC6EkC0QuzB+xVNaIVhimgb u3J/6YYVnKsy9E3ATy/UWE+cLNXaPddTma9scUgc+w9imr71cIasK3qOPcYgE9YB/pK2 huXf9HsnQzVH0icRGFbigbp5CUz+XW5pf1/tI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=le1GUptU9JjBH114uU563JmUcYegKwYn9xh0zAQdRv8=; b=FZdRB/Nd3q+M6/6HZBdkxUrGeZ4AD14Dj/Msf8dzSEMRriexAYLTp6nPOoiEH4gTQp SKH0PausLznyP0/X4kovWOLbZlIGU68Eeh651JrsFqd+njFvRTAd/sCTqgYmfFwiy1gg JjTOlgl5SXYYGRO6MPBv9m8iCx9SNl9O5caSIwbmbhAPZAk14rRL0WFBRfSH1XUzcoPn 8/FcSb86r6W4G2zjSa7bZsBxJFUn+Fy99nD5qS8Hbggp9DUS/YrItta5wMQMsi+3rCks O+GDGSODIRywxxNyaABS3efoR77jy00XJ8o9Q+oamZxxdkJbp6ugFJp//2XNYBCraatr Kzdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LihRj6FJdcpP5iYCjaVcknO9L2HsDE3CCMzQ4oYF3vCMaxu// W/3gkK1dSCnQvtGvf/E5F1x9aA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4MKP5KGohAdR58eqqZNbRUjATksd5quRpBzCsMu6hT8STZxdOkUvTUNe8EYXb+jIiohIVBA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:bc14:: with SMTP id s20mr14299261wrg.220.1602230408064; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 01:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm11634118wri.45.2020.10.09.01.00.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 01:00:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development , LKML Subject: [PATCH v2 11/17] vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn as unsafe Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:59:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20201009075934.3509076-12-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201009075934.3509076-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201009075934.3509076-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201009_040009_182371_8E10FE65 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.04 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:441 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Kees Cook , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Vetter , Cornelia Huck , Alex Williamson , linux-mm@kvack.org, =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , John Hubbard , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The code seems to stuff these pfns into iommu pts (or something like that, I didn't follow), but there's no mmu_notifier to ensure that access is synchronized with pte updates. Hence mark these as unsafe. This means that with CONFIG_STRICT_FOLLOW_PFN, these will be rejected. Real fix is to wire up an mmu_notifier ... somehow. Probably means any invalidate is a fatal fault for this vfio device, but then this shouldn't ever happen if userspace is reasonable. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Dan Williams Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: Cornelia Huck Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index 5fbf0c1f7433..a4d53f3d0a35 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm, { int ret; - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); + ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); if (ret) { bool unlocked = false; @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm, if (ret) return ret; - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); + ret = unsafe_follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn); } return ret;