From patchwork Fri Oct 30 10:08:13 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11869165 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09DBC4741F for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE11206E3 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:13:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="1XLCJ3C5"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="GXHxO1RP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BAE11206E3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=yU/FC70xy2FItrG6saXbvugNkMGy2fphH711rJ85+aA=; b=1XLCJ3C5u2ZH36AuL2Val7s7Z E1hVf/bG4CH/+1l3U4zmYzfDqTxxkxOFdhZ0f/jwvpCyDWvBOB2v44fk2lSSyt7S3vIEbEN11mOp/ ReGDnZ2EyOcxUNXTU3FX/POVOIdzqqEURMXSu18m6Xx14jC5pZkR17rapMP7za3EENEB9FizpnP0O g9HZdus0N0yBnYpeJcWibqXWEXmeBcXV/p+M0aLBmMkPYYoss4oFhDlFNYV7xF8sSjLWz59buAUsW gZMbxUwSW8X7ZDOKDYnWDNvcXB9toeIZizBVUAzn5Z16acJYeh/p1CdfWSxQrOx7fet9xYMx68fkl Vf4O5HP1A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kYROR-0000be-Ql; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:12:23 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kYRL8-0007Vz-2X for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:09:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id l8so2393652wmg.3 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:08:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bLRenZ+k6OnrWeyL17PS5vv24685dEitAu61SyAKZwA=; b=GXHxO1RP7TK95Adu5+iOnFzwfvM1BylUWHit0kEyTRTLVttqP1P3S95IoPuxbcmlFB 5Ozb+6/u63pPnXm1hxcZRtaICRTk3yz0dsT7WEHo9xO0nj24N6aRdnRJ88svYaFT4zH1 M/1kNldB+IOH+DlAmBexn1ek5RHkrsQQkz1dU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bLRenZ+k6OnrWeyL17PS5vv24685dEitAu61SyAKZwA=; b=eA3LL0i6MP/IcKdLYTszkXPh/VrezrWSVDT6kc5M3kZLUCHOuOrLmq8n6h8WRSUBPY +1o3G7FvlE100Et56zXjBJ7ISvxm1ubY4adQS6pEJbfeG0W4lEDp5lwIUxWUKqHM/Tio WGCts6xLAL35QGEwvDsI13TFW+5EkaY9myusx8a1FF2wE6q9gKhCWhBkCXdHGtXEsIMF T1s7ieoI3T66u1EzIW5kmd4Y+7P10i8Sb8mON94mcvC5d3332fgIXCbqAxkdZ00Pu+kr 5mERV7NKSS5OQ8O10cz1uqMON7mJ/JGHXeAZ11gxPPDzs4HJkrNuAzAcuNGxVRxUV5CT WQEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jUb33J7fl2uFGUjZJ/TwnU1IKL9nopsRK+nWVduVFdi6ASYsA Y0ffkBQy2sPR7mki84Lxg6vCtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/i1hJloa86kniLQRB2Ym3mXkp18H0V5ZxOvETtprEDfWEpkrDMUxmmStycaPdhj+fBSAIzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c3:: with SMTP id g3mr1715102wmk.65.1604052536620; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v189sm4430947wmg.14.2020.10.30.03.08.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:08:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development , LKML Subject: [PATCH v5 13/15] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:08:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20201030100815.2269-14-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201030100815.2269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201030100815.2269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201030_060858_399181_A8B1397D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Kees Cook , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Vetter , David Hildenbrand , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-mm@kvack.org, =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Arnd Bergmann , John Hubbard , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org We want all iomem mmaps to consistently revoke ptes when the kernel takes over and CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is enabled. This includes the pci bar mmaps available through procfs and sysfs, which currently do not revoke mappings. To prepare for this, move the code from the /dev/kmem driver to kernel/resource.c. Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Dan Williams Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- v3: - add barrier for consistency and document why we don't have to check for NULL (Jason) v4 - Adjust comments to reflect the general nature of this iomem revoke code now (Dan) --- drivers/char/mem.c | 85 +--------------------------------- include/linux/ioport.h | 6 +-- kernel/resource.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c index 7dcf9e4ea79d..43c871dc7477 100644 --- a/drivers/char/mem.c +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c @@ -31,9 +31,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include -#include -#include #ifdef CONFIG_IA64 # include @@ -836,42 +833,6 @@ static loff_t memory_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int orig) return ret; } -static struct inode *devmem_inode; - -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) -{ - /* pairs with smp_store_release() in devmem_init_inode() */ - struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&devmem_inode); - - /* - * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race - * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before - * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent /dev/mem from - * establishing mappings. - */ - if (!inode) - return; - - /* - * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked - * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() - * should start returning false, however for performance this - * does not iterate the entire resource range. - */ - if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && - devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { - /* - * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the - * worst that can happen?" - */ - return; - } - - unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1); -} -#endif - static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) { int rc; @@ -891,7 +852,7 @@ static int open_port(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) * revocations when drivers want to take over a /dev/mem mapped * range. */ - filp->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping; + filp->f_mapping = iomem_get_mapping(); return 0; } @@ -1023,48 +984,6 @@ static char *mem_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode) static struct class *mem_class; -static int devmem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) -{ - return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; -} - -static struct file_system_type devmem_fs_type = { - .name = "devmem", - .owner = THIS_MODULE, - .init_fs_context = devmem_fs_init_fs_context, - .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, -}; - -static int devmem_init_inode(void) -{ - static struct vfsmount *devmem_vfs_mount; - static int devmem_fs_cnt; - struct inode *inode; - int rc; - - rc = simple_pin_fs(&devmem_fs_type, &devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt); - if (rc < 0) { - pr_err("Cannot mount /dev/mem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc); - return rc; - } - - inode = alloc_anon_inode(devmem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); - if (IS_ERR(inode)) { - rc = PTR_ERR(inode); - pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for /dev/mem: %d\n", rc); - simple_release_fs(&devmem_vfs_mount, &devmem_fs_cnt); - return rc; - } - - /* - * Publish /dev/mem initialized. - * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_devmem(). - */ - smp_store_release(&devmem_inode, inode); - - return 0; -} - static int __init chr_dev_init(void) { int minor; @@ -1086,8 +1005,6 @@ static int __init chr_dev_init(void) */ if ((minor == DEVPORT_MINOR) && !arch_has_dev_port()) continue; - if ((minor == DEVMEM_MINOR) && devmem_init_inode() != 0) - continue; device_create(mem_class, NULL, MKDEV(MEM_MAJOR, minor), NULL, devlist[minor].name); diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h index 5135d4b86cd6..02a5466245c0 100644 --- a/include/linux/ioport.h +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h @@ -307,11 +307,7 @@ struct resource *devm_request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *request_free_mem_region(struct resource *base, unsigned long size, const char *name); -#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM -void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res); -#else -static inline void revoke_devmem(struct resource *res) { }; -#endif +extern struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void); #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _LINUX_IOPORT_H */ diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index 3ae2f56cc79d..5ecc3187fe2d 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -18,12 +18,15 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include +#include #include @@ -1115,6 +1118,58 @@ resource_size_t resource_alignment(struct resource *res) static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(muxed_resource_wait); +static struct inode *iomem_inode; + +#ifdef CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) +{ + /* pairs with smp_store_release() in iomem_init_inode() */ + struct inode *inode = smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode); + + /* + * Check that the initialization has completed. Losing the race + * is ok because it means drivers are claiming resources before + * the fs_initcall level of init and prevent iomem_get_mapping users + * from establishing mappings. + */ + if (!inode) + return; + + /* + * The expectation is that the driver has successfully marked + * the resource busy by this point, so devmem_is_allowed() + * should start returning false, however for performance this + * does not iterate the entire resource range. + */ + if (devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->start)) && + devmem_is_allowed(PHYS_PFN(res->end))) { + /* + * *cringe* iomem=relaxed says "go ahead, what's the + * worst that can happen?" + */ + return; + } + + unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, res->start, resource_size(res), 1); +} +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) +{ + /* + * This function is only called from file open paths, hence guaranteed + * that fs_initcalls have completed and no need to check for NULL. But + * since revoke_iomem can be called before the initcall we still need + * the barrier to appease checkers. + */ + return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping; +} +#else +static void revoke_iomem(struct resource *res) {} +struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void) +{ + return NULL; +} +#endif + /** * __request_region - create a new busy resource region * @parent: parent resource descriptor @@ -1182,7 +1237,7 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent, write_unlock(&resource_lock); if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource) - revoke_devmem(res); + revoke_iomem(res); return res; } @@ -1782,4 +1837,48 @@ static int __init strict_iomem(char *str) return 1; } +static int iomem_fs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) +{ + return init_pseudo(fc, DEVMEM_MAGIC) ? 0 : -ENOMEM; +} + +static struct file_system_type iomem_fs_type = { + .name = "iomem", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .init_fs_context = iomem_fs_init_fs_context, + .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, +}; + +static int __init iomem_init_inode(void) +{ + static struct vfsmount *iomem_vfs_mount; + static int iomem_fs_cnt; + struct inode *inode; + int rc; + + rc = simple_pin_fs(&iomem_fs_type, &iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt); + if (rc < 0) { + pr_err("Cannot mount iomem pseudo filesystem: %d\n", rc); + return rc; + } + + inode = alloc_anon_inode(iomem_vfs_mount->mnt_sb); + if (IS_ERR(inode)) { + rc = PTR_ERR(inode); + pr_err("Cannot allocate inode for iomem: %d\n", rc); + simple_release_fs(&iomem_vfs_mount, &iomem_fs_cnt); + return rc; + } + + /* + * Publish iomem revocation inode initialized. + * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in revoke_iomem(). + */ + smp_store_release(&iomem_inode, inode); + + return 0; +} + +fs_initcall(iomem_init_inode); + __setup("iomem=", strict_iomem);