@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct oabi_epoll_event {
__u64 data;
} __attribute__ ((packed,aligned(4)));
+#ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL
asmlinkage long sys_oabi_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
struct oabi_epoll_event __user *event)
{
@@ -298,6 +299,20 @@ asmlinkage long sys_oabi_epoll_wait(int
kfree(kbuf);
return err ? -EFAULT : ret;
}
+#else
+asmlinkage long sys_oabi_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
+ struct oabi_epoll_event __user *event)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+asmlinkage long sys_oabi_epoll_wait(int epfd,
+ struct oabi_epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
struct oabi_sembuf {
unsigned short sem_num;
When CONFIG_EPOLL is not set/enabled, sys_oabi-compat.c has build errors. Fix these by surrounding them with ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL/endif and providing stubs for the "EPOLL is not set" case. ../arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c: In function 'sys_oabi_epoll_ctl': ../arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:257:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'ep_op_has_event' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 257 | if (ep_op_has_event(op) && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c:264:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'do_epoll_ctl'; did you mean 'sys_epoll_ctl'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 264 | return do_epoll_ctl(epfd, op, fd, &kernel, false); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Fixes: 687ad0191488 ("[ARM] 3109/1: old ABI compat: syscall wrappers for ABI impedance matching") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> # from an lkp .config file Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- or does OABI require epoll? how is that enforced? arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)