From patchwork Mon Feb 8 14:03:27 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Serge Semin X-Patchwork-Id: 12075535 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06DAC433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5293064E24 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:06:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5293064E24 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baikalelectronics.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Ewudhoxi0p80coc8W0vMRB9eqPAOI0Qa1mvzUGYA3F4=; b=lQGna47NplsCi4uzYr00YZYXF sZ4FRUQ9ck5w9ctBtAikKQpex4P5Lo6gDC58XLfDoWLlynAk6YafJKmxk3JFRtYmvGZxjbDi3LfkJ CVkTwdcvtUDhCOcGRgSG1qfV8g21ggtw0fqGbwj8+VO8PeHZBAW7OVCKcBRaglM5SoeHTLMuPeYTa piBMTlPsJq1HUzQhZrnoww9BItKh6I4O5O1ZuIfm0GLa12x0IpKPt71EVVavNggV3tS3nXcHKPPwZ ucBL3MHbknh1wholEnWUh5Hr2UkobLdz1La1E/7LwfveNVzGFBX74pp9++Rdu319No+YeC45S1TcL KWMLluPDQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l979O-0003Hs-Lq; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:04:26 +0000 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.com ([87.245.175.226] helo=mail.baikalelectronics.ru) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l978n-00034r-JR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:03:53 +0000 From: Serge Semin To: Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Joao Pinto , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin Subject: [PATCH 06/20] net: stmmac: Use LPI IRQ status-related macro in DW MAC1000 isr Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:03:27 +0300 Message-ID: <20210208140341.9271-7-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> In-Reply-To: <20210208140341.9271-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> References: <20210208140341.9271-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210208_090349_832465_35828E86 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.15 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Serge Semin , Vyacheslav Mitrofanov , Pavel Parkhomenko , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Heiner Kallweit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org For some reason the DW MAC1000-specific IRQ status handler has been using the GMAC_INT_DISABLE_PMT macro to test whether the PMT IRQ is pending in the MAC status register while there is a dedicated macro GMAC_INT_STATUS_PMT exists for the corresponding field to test. It didn't cause any error because the bits position match in both DW MAC IRQ mask and status registers, but semantically the code still doesn't look correct. Let's fix that by using the correct macro there. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin --- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c index fc8759f146c7..6b9a4f54b93c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int dwmac1000_irq_status(struct mac_device_info *hw, x->mmc_rx_irq_n++; if (unlikely(intr_status & GMAC_INT_STATUS_MMCCSUM)) x->mmc_rx_csum_offload_irq_n++; - if (unlikely(intr_status & GMAC_INT_DISABLE_PMT)) { + if (unlikely(intr_status & GMAC_INT_STATUS_PMT)) { /* clear the PMT bits 5 and 6 by reading the PMT status reg */ readl(ioaddr + GMAC_PMT); x->irq_receive_pmt_irq_n++;