diff mbox series

dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: Remove duplicate ti, j721e-sdhci-4bit

Message ID 20210428230500.19214-1-s-anna@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: Remove duplicate ti, j721e-sdhci-4bit | expand

Commit Message

Suman Anna April 28, 2021, 11:05 p.m. UTC
The commit 7c7905df68c5 ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: fix compatible
for j7200") switched the compatible property from a regular enum to an
more appropriate combinatorial oneOf convention, and in the process has
introduced a duplicate ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit.

This generated the following warning on J721E boards that use the
ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit for two nodes:
 "mmc@4fb0000: compatible: More than one condition true in oneOf schema"
 "mmc@4f98000: compatible: More than one condition true in oneOf schema"

Remove the duplicate to fix this.

Fixes: 7c7905df68c5 ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: fix compatible for j7200")
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
Hi Ulf,

The warning is a bit more verbose, I have minimized the log in above
commit message. You can see the issue with dtbs_check on both latest
master and linux-next using DT_SCHEMA_FILES.

regards
Suman

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ulf Hansson May 11, 2021, 10:56 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 01:05, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
>
> The commit 7c7905df68c5 ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: fix compatible
> for j7200") switched the compatible property from a regular enum to an
> more appropriate combinatorial oneOf convention, and in the process has
> introduced a duplicate ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit.
>
> This generated the following warning on J721E boards that use the
> ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit for two nodes:
>  "mmc@4fb0000: compatible: More than one condition true in oneOf schema"
>  "mmc@4f98000: compatible: More than one condition true in oneOf schema"
>
> Remove the duplicate to fix this.
>
> Fixes: 7c7905df68c5 ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-am654: fix compatible for j7200")
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>

Applied for next, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
> Hi Ulf,
>
> The warning is a bit more verbose, I have minimized the log in above
> commit message. You can see the issue with dtbs_check on both latest
> master and linux-next using DT_SCHEMA_FILES.
>
> regards
> Suman
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
> index 3a79e39253d2..29399e88ac53 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ properties:
>        - const: ti,am654-sdhci-5.1
>        - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-8bit
>        - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit
> -      - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit
>        - const: ti,am64-sdhci-8bit
>        - const: ti,am64-sdhci-4bit
>        - items:
> --
> 2.30.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
index 3a79e39253d2..29399e88ac53 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-am654.yaml
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@  properties:
       - const: ti,am654-sdhci-5.1
       - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-8bit
       - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit
-      - const: ti,j721e-sdhci-4bit
       - const: ti,am64-sdhci-8bit
       - const: ti,am64-sdhci-4bit
       - items: