From patchwork Wed Jun 9 08:01:01 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miquel Raynal X-Patchwork-Id: 12309261 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14853C47095 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A8761285 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:13:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C6A8761285 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=B9rGEhcaqvUIO3Bud6iP4o+JHIqVJSc4nx4IImX5jS4=; b=lp3tYgsCGMsmvT UCFLqSR3Z3unhYtU7xiKBm4mA/ORA9FZsGaAX4v/UclLVdSqBo6N8Li5a4hMeqlKA66EvGRlHOLFZ uKmINWaM9D7BwsKIXsPUWh6QYy/OQbljiuW71WPV5FwXidaSZ4bGPDZ4gELfTWFBwo0RbdCChliy7 u7eJ47K3u3DhQWYVUqa7YYRyW6duKdCoNA74/Z7yLYibg0eTvX4rOjGo0bUvZ0Fd4hcQ1dsS32k35 b4xfGP50WFwCCjHmwUNtMHGTKZKUrdgYitsNGKOHJMQkDr9sk1vHOM8oF/vD/8n8zgiHiq8bo1RGf bRAVhMjY9CUnYj085Wpw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lqtIm-00CImn-SF; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:11:05 +0000 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lqt9Z-00CEyS-GI; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:01:35 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7BC2200012; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:01:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Miquel Raynal To: Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , , Rob Herring , , Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Michal Simek , Naga Sureshkumar Relli , Amit Kumar Mahapatra , Thomas Petazzoni , , , helmut.grohne@intenta.de, Srinivas Goud , Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu , Miquel Raynal , Rob Herring Subject: [PATCH v22 07/18] dt-binding: memory: pl353-smc: Fix the NAND controller node in the example Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:01:01 +0200 Message-Id: <20210609080112.1753221-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210609080112.1753221-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20210609080112.1753221-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210609_010133_723122_F2611298 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.15 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org To be fully valid, the NAND controller node in the example should be named nand-controller instead of flash, should be at the address @0,0 instead of @e1000000 and should have a couple of: - #address-cells - #size-cells properties. The label is being renamed nfc0 as well which is more usual than nand_0. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt index 3ff6a4a49302..ecd46856f139 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt @@ -35,8 +35,10 @@ Example: 0x1 0x0 0xe2000000 0x2000000 /* SRAM/NOR CS0 region */ 0x2 0x0 0xe4000000 0x2000000>; /* SRAM/NOR CS1 region */ - nand_0: flash@e1000000 { + nfc0: nand-controller@0,0 { compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1"; reg = <0 0 0x1000000>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; }; };