diff mbox series

[v2,3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add DDR carveout memory nodes for R5Fs

Message ID 20210615195718.15898-4-s-anna@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add R5F nodes on TI K3 AM64x SoCs | expand

Commit Message

Suman Anna June 15, 2021, 7:57 p.m. UTC
Two carveout reserved memory nodes each have been added for each of the
R5F remote processor devices within the MAIN domain on the TI AM642 EVM
and SK boards. These nodes are assigned to the respective rproc device
nodes as well. The first region will be used as the DMA pool for the rproc
devices, and the second region will furnish the static carveout regions
for the firmware memory.

An additional reserved memory node is also added to reserve a portion of
the DDR memory to be used for performing inter-processor communication
between all the remote processors running RTOS or baremetal firmwares.
8 MB of memory is reserved for this purpose, and this accounts for all
the vrings and vring buffers between all the possible pairs of remote
processors.

The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
rproc device. The R5F processors do not have an MMU, and as such require
the exact memory used by the firmwares to be set-aside. The firmware
images do not require any RSC_CARVEOUT entries in their resource tables
to allocate the memory for firmware memory segments.

NOTE:
1. The R5F1 carveouts are needed only if the R5F cluster is running in
   Split (non Single-CPU) mode. The reserved memory nodes can be disabled
   later on if there is no use-case defined to use the corresponding
   remote processor.
2. The AM64x SoCs do not have any DSPs and one less R5F cluster compared
   to J721E SoCs. So, while the carveout memories reserved for the R5F
   clusters present on the SoC match to those on J721E, the overall
   memory map reserved for firmwares is quite different. The number of
   R5F clusters on AM64x SoCs are same as on J7200 SoCs, but the AM64x
   SoCs also have an additional M4F core, so the RTOS IPC memory region
   is 1 MB higher than on J7200 SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
No code changes, rebased and retained the presence after the mailbox nodes

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+)

Comments

Nishanth Menon June 17, 2021, 12:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On 14:57-20210615, Suman Anna wrote:
[...]
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> index 2e75cd68f8b7..030712221188 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> @@ -38,6 +38,60 @@ secure_ddr: optee@9e800000 {
>  			alignment = <0x1000>;
>  			no-map;
>  		};
> +
[...]
> +		main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a3100000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0x00 0xa3100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
> +			no-map;
> +		};
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-dma-memory@a0000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-memory@a0100000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-dma-memory@a1000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-memory@a1100000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-dma-memory@a2000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-memory@a2100000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-dma-memory@a3000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dt.yaml:0:0: /reserved-memory/r5f-memory@a3100000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['shared-dma-pool']

ughh..

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt is
not converted to yaml.

Rob, Arnd,

I am considering to pick this series up this friday given the scale
of other platforms that are using the same property and since I see
for example commit 0fe0fbc867115659bbd9a0ab107d1fe9bcc432e8 (MIPS)
in next-20210616. Unfortunately [1] does'nt give me much precedence
either in immediate recent history.

Let me know if you think we should wait on this.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/?q=shared-dma-pool
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
index 2e75cd68f8b7..030712221188 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
@@ -38,6 +38,60 @@  secure_ddr: optee@9e800000 {
 			alignment = <0x1000>;
 			no-map;
 		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a0000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa0000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@a0100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa0100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a1000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa1000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a1100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa1100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a2000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa2000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@a2100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa2100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a3000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa3000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a3100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa3100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		rtos_ipc_memory_region: ipc-memories@a5000000 {
+			reg = <0x00 0xa5000000 0x00 0x00800000>;
+			alignment = <0x1000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
 	};
 
 	evm_12v0: fixedregulator-evm12v0 {
@@ -471,18 +525,26 @@  &mailbox0_cluster7 {
 
 &main_r5fss0_core0 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core0>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss0_core1 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core1>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss0_core1_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss1_core0 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core0>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core0_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss1_core0_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss1_core1 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core1>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core1_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &serdes_ln_ctrl {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts
index 4abddea92cf5..d3aa2901e6fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts
@@ -37,6 +37,60 @@  secure_ddr: optee@9e800000 {
 			alignment = <0x1000>;
 			no-map;
 		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a0000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa0000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@a0100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa0100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a1000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa1000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss0_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a1100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa1100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core0_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a2000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa2000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core0_memory_region: r5f-memory@a2100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa2100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core1_dma_memory_region: r5f-dma-memory@a3000000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa3000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region: r5f-memory@a3100000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0x00 0xa3100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+
+		rtos_ipc_memory_region: ipc-memories@a5000000 {
+			reg = <0x00 0xa5000000 0x00 0x00800000>;
+			alignment = <0x1000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
 	};
 
 	vusb_main: fixed-regulator-vusb-main5v0 {
@@ -370,18 +424,26 @@  &mailbox0_cluster7 {
 
 &main_r5fss0_core0 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core0>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss0_core1 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core1>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss0_core1_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss1_core0 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core0>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core0_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss1_core0_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &main_r5fss1_core1 {
 	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core1>;
+	memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core1_dma_memory_region>,
+			<&main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region>;
 };
 
 &pcie0_rc {