From patchwork Wed Aug 11 11:48:51 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" X-Patchwork-Id: 12430977 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70704C4338F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3989F60F56 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3989F60F56 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7/7T91VIhLmbmEURJLOWfeDvLq/TOPtR5Aou8MZZMu4=; b=PgqzLHxlKSyPQD Df5e4Em06VfdJmo/ZtNiMZNNHFDhbleYyKlXqd8lfJdWWjwxMueWU0lDmR5xHIg5EhGYXgZsKSpq6 OfxzntujLWBRvAM+kTjbapFqHqrxWcRwEB9K5yGoTOT6hhroTR+C26Zz/yjeNlvXdeEDe1RRwWtWQ Zr0pSiChtVCplxdPmBDMfbjN/0BbF+eaYsJvZizxz5vUeWAkKAkosDPxgiyo6ynoie0ELEOo9njCz t13DIoHsG9mmctQXbKp9hHWDCawFdmnVx296Dmb35Ce0GOJRpfRx2/hQ4GyDb4nz0ZvSXpboX5q7U LZS7vF1S87GwcaFz9bIA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mDmqk-006qVp-8p; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:56:46 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mDmpD-006q34-Rr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:55:16 +0000 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gl7SY1sQpz86HM; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:51:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:55:06 +0800 Received: from thunder-town.china.huawei.com (10.174.179.0) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:55:05 +0800 From: Zhen Lei To: Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , "Joerg Roedel" , linux-arm-kernel , iommu , CC: Zhen Lei Subject: [PATCH 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add and use static helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:48:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20210811114852.2429-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20210811114852.2429-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <20210811114852.2429-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.179.0] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210811_045512_360269_985DF7AB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org One SMMU has only one normal CMDQ. Therefore, this CMDQ is used regardless of the core on which the command is inserted. It can be referenced directly through "smmu->cmdq". However, one SMMU has multiple ECMDQs, and the ECMDQ used by the core on which the command insertion is executed may be different. So the helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() is added, which returns the CMDQ/ECMDQ that the current core should use. Currently, the code that supports ECMDQ is not added. just simply returns "&smmu->cmdq". Many subfunctions of arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() use "&smmu->cmdq" or "&smmu->cmdq.q" directly. To support ECMDQ, they need to call the newly added function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() instead. Note that normal CMDQ is still required until ECMDQ is available. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index 282f95659580267..be2df5ad2eb51b8 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) return 0; } +static struct arm_smmu_cmdq *arm_smmu_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + return &smmu->cmdq; +} + static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, - u32 prod) + struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u32 prod) { - struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q; struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC, }; @@ -579,7 +583,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { unsigned long flags; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); int ret = 0; /* @@ -595,7 +599,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); do { - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); if (!queue_full(llq)) break; @@ -614,7 +618,7 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, { int ret = 0; struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod)); queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); @@ -637,12 +641,12 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq) { struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); u32 prod = llq->prod; int ret = 0; queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp); - llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val); + llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val); do { if (queue_consumed(llq, prod)) break; @@ -732,7 +736,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 prod; unsigned long flags; bool owner; - struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq; + struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu); struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = { .max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift, }, head = llq; @@ -772,7 +776,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(cmdq, cmds, llq.prod, n); if (sync) { prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n); - arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, prod); + arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, &cmdq->q, prod); queue_write(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, prod), cmd_sync, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS); /*