From patchwork Wed Nov 17 06:43:35 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reiji Watanabe X-Patchwork-Id: 12692830 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15BAC433EF for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C3461BF5 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:51:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 65C3461BF5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:References: Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BKZiWj+PpDDomHDZaBcu1s3ff62tiLr1DKTwj58XoK0=; b=NCcRLrDcE2cvgUBAv63KaUbokU Y5QnudvFEylc+KyfPJtVkWD49rANJjiftgDdH+WNjSMDqoDCHAOuz4YV0kyjMMnuM6+0XF0jGOg2N 20OBF3WzAsmWKhcfU7t17x182UNE2RvwGKVVoI+g1kTVbRmOYtCkdTlkE2KawIKMEWRyB5NUCRCo2 jItqMMQGeQ8/TVd0jDPb8/pwybLfgMz1dpvg7asCYK+s/kcTpDagBtVlcv390VoUVRnD+fcW9IqC5 otuf65keEz+Wzp79HNBTW17sFjvDA3rki8tKQM8kvCqdrekJPz0mYBtr/czYJ+2INaG7NZgcE0lgG gvZ0Zw0A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mnElv-003YHs-7h; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:50:19 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x64a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::64a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mnElk-003YEi-HH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:50:10 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id i3-20020a170902c94300b0014287dc7dcbso553136pla.16 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:50:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=tq9EsnBDsIULQVxeorKH97JMfxdcU3KwA0yIbRqb8nc=; b=Yfc5AyPfrAryp4Ly0NWpHvWkMzvobkI4oVp3ewLCX41K3bjSVjPldr2kYS+ztybCjt 5AnGjw8annOa4qaveRkzMBLnQpwxpITb5wACIILLFPP2l9bfKYll9XOqxL1IZAcwgqEU vhCleY0OFQjLwmop8/zWloUH6byFk+JUA+H2YmwXO0sZbMLIstxFWsRJ8MIpgYqoKQ9y 45HqmWmuC0xStSdr5Fkp3mxIBc/rGMey5VtzYvSkGP2jAQ9RQDDjXFlFXw60NEMHPRJM 3vXEJRG1XJpl+8b5kL2rVtzwOqc4Ulx7Q528xcpC/XAExBQYk+yyrJcxLxuOBrZUy1nQ 5+dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=tq9EsnBDsIULQVxeorKH97JMfxdcU3KwA0yIbRqb8nc=; b=yqHL5bkUNlShkhCIdSwN7B9ebtVttlcMyblRK5NERpBi3lOlHK3gkTBTP2EFUL0uYq baVG3EbxoZSkydJbmd0QkJ/KNYxS8INVzhPdfyP7EjQwsOch4sWA0Z5afpyjrffMNQPj FnqUWBftlilkW5vliL99SGgQN1CFA/nNZX4cDa267bKS0rxU1fxlnqEH1fmKoCJIZF0E eLXjA/s8NfQKAGoFb0E5ZbYc+0SqxSpi+XlW0kEFWuGC5xTmqNGbP47l6UiZUXmDSkiy pK9kurKebfHpqkX6W5IFfdUarIRZUjd/1ON60bFAQkqV4sAeYnN/4eqvp+4ZK0cwFRN2 R+tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iLFFgUpH+IVObQ/2IOtWIFBANNXRN9ETaS0FjHj5TrTgP+qKe rOz97HvelWoe7wv3qy8DjYr9bu0vjy4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyw3+jvRUQTNuXU0Rs/FuDUFQG75ZnH7tR0+PpZD5NxVMfLc/BgVA4P+9YHIUJfIQCNVEBtndUZ0eA= X-Received: from reiji-vws-sp.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3d59]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:9692:b0:143:d9ad:d151 with SMTP id n18-20020a170902969200b00143d9add151mr5223500plp.40.1637131807111; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:50:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com> Message-Id: <20211117064359.2362060-6-reijiw@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 05/29] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Will Deacon , Andrew Jones , Peng Liang , Peter Shier , Ricardo Koller , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang , Raghavendra Rao Anata , Reiji Watanabe X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211116_225008_609966_9008CC4C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 to make it writable by userspace. Return an error if userspace tries to set MTE field of the register to a value that conflicts with KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE configuration for the guest. Skip fractional feature fields validation at present and they will be handled by the following patches. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h index 597609f26331..b7ad59fd22e2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ #define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_32BIT_64BIT 0x2 /* id_aa64pfr1 */ +#define ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT 32 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT 16 #define ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT 12 #define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT 8 diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 35400869067a..7dc2b0d41b75 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -433,6 +433,21 @@ static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } +static int validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val) +{ + bool kvm_mte = kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm); + unsigned int mte; + + mte = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT); + + /* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT. */ + if (kvm_mte ^ (mte > 0)) + return -EPERM; + + return 0; +} + static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) { u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val; @@ -464,6 +479,12 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit; } +static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) +{ + if (!system_supports_mte()) + id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE); +} + static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct id_reg_info *idr) { @@ -478,6 +499,14 @@ static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return val; } +static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *idr) +{ + return kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ? + idr->vcpu_limit_val : + (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE))); +} + static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = { .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .ftr_check_types = S_FCT(ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, FCT_LOWER_SAFE) | @@ -487,6 +516,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = { .get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1, }; +static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = { + .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, + .ftr_check_types = U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) | + U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE) | + U_FCT(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT, FCT_IGNORE), + .init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info, + .validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1, + .get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1, +}; + /* * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table. @@ -497,6 +536,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = { #define GET_ID_REG_INFO(id) (id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)]) static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = { [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info, + [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info, }; static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@ -1345,10 +1385,6 @@ static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id) val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), gic_lim); } break; - case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1: - if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) - val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE); - break; case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1: if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |