Message ID | 20211210065533.2023-5-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | support reserving crashkernel above 4G on arm64 kdump | expand |
On 12/10/21 12:55 AM, Zhen Lei wrote: > From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > > We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the > xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to > x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low](). > So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() > to keep them in x86. > > Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com> > Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Acked-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@oracle.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > index bb2a0973b98059e..7ae00716a208f82 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > @@ -456,7 +456,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) > > crashk_low_res.start = low_base; > crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1; > - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); > #endif > return 0; > } > @@ -480,11 +479,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > high = true; > } > > - if (xen_pv_domain()) { > - pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); > - return; > - } > - > /* 0 means: find the address automatically */ > if (!crash_base) { > /* > @@ -531,7 +525,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > > crashk_res.start = crash_base; > crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1; > - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); > } > #else > static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > @@ -1143,7 +1136,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > * Reserve memory for crash kernel after SRAT is parsed so that it > * won't consume hotpluggable memory. > */ > - reserve_crashkernel(); > + if (xen_pv_domain()) > + pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); > + else { > + reserve_crashkernel(); > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE > + if (crashk_res.end > crashk_res.start) > + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); > + if (crashk_low_res.end > crashk_low_res.start) > + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); > +#endif > + } > > memblock_find_dma_reserve(); >
On 2021/12/10 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: > From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > > We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the > xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to > x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low](). > So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() > to keep them in x86. > > Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com> > Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > index bb2a0973b98059e..7ae00716a208f82 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > @@ -456,7 +456,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) > > crashk_low_res.start = low_base; > crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1; > - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); > #endif > return 0; > } > @@ -480,11 +479,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > high = true; > } > > - if (xen_pv_domain()) { > - pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); > - return; > - } > - > /* 0 means: find the address automatically */ > if (!crash_base) { > /* > @@ -531,7 +525,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > > crashk_res.start = crash_base; > crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1; > - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); > } > #else > static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > @@ -1143,7 +1136,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > * Reserve memory for crash kernel after SRAT is parsed so that it > * won't consume hotpluggable memory. > */ > - reserve_crashkernel(); Hi Baoquan: How about move "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE" here, so that we can remove the empty reserve_crashkernel(). In fact, xen_pv_domain() is invoked only when CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is enabled before. > + if (xen_pv_domain()) > + pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); > + else { > + reserve_crashkernel(); > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE > + if (crashk_res.end > crashk_res.start) > + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); > + if (crashk_low_res.end > crashk_low_res.start) > + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); > +#endif > + } > > memblock_find_dma_reserve(); > >
On 2021/12/14 19:40, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > On 2021/12/10 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >> From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> >> >> We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the >> xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to >> x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low](). >> So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() >> to keep them in x86. >> >> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> >> Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com> >> Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> >> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c >> index bb2a0973b98059e..7ae00716a208f82 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c >> @@ -456,7 +456,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) >> >> crashk_low_res.start = low_base; >> crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1; >> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); >> #endif >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -480,11 +479,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) >> high = true; >> } >> >> - if (xen_pv_domain()) { >> - pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); >> - return; >> - } >> - >> /* 0 means: find the address automatically */ >> if (!crash_base) { >> /* >> @@ -531,7 +525,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) >> >> crashk_res.start = crash_base; >> crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1; >> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); >> } >> #else >> static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) >> @@ -1143,7 +1136,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) >> * Reserve memory for crash kernel after SRAT is parsed so that it >> * won't consume hotpluggable memory. >> */ >> - reserve_crashkernel(); > > Hi Baoquan: > How about move "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE" here, so that we can remove the > empty reserve_crashkernel(). In fact, xen_pv_domain() is invoked only > when CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is enabled before. Hi Baoquan: Did you miss this email? If no reply, I will keep it no change. > >> + if (xen_pv_domain()) >> + pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); >> + else { >> + reserve_crashkernel(); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE >> + if (crashk_res.end > crashk_res.start) >> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); >> + if (crashk_low_res.end > crashk_low_res.start) >> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); >> +#endif >> + } >> >> memblock_find_dma_reserve(); >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > . >
On 12/15/21 at 04:56pm, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > On 2021/12/14 19:40, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > > > > On 2021/12/10 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: > >> From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > >> > >> We will make the functions reserve_crashkernel() as generic, the > >> xen_pv_domain() check in reserve_crashkernel() is relevant only to > >> x86, the same as insert_resource() in reserve_crashkernel[_low](). > >> So move xen_pv_domain() check and insert_resource() to setup_arch() > >> to keep them in x86. > >> > >> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > >> Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@oracle.com> > >> Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com> > >> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> index bb2a0973b98059e..7ae00716a208f82 100644 > >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > >> @@ -456,7 +456,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) > >> > >> crashk_low_res.start = low_base; > >> crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1; > >> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); > >> #endif > >> return 0; > >> } > >> @@ -480,11 +479,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > >> high = true; > >> } > >> > >> - if (xen_pv_domain()) { > >> - pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); > >> - return; > >> - } > >> - > >> /* 0 means: find the address automatically */ > >> if (!crash_base) { > >> /* > >> @@ -531,7 +525,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > >> > >> crashk_res.start = crash_base; > >> crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1; > >> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); > >> } > >> #else > >> static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > >> @@ -1143,7 +1136,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) > >> * Reserve memory for crash kernel after SRAT is parsed so that it > >> * won't consume hotpluggable memory. > >> */ > >> - reserve_crashkernel(); > > > > Hi Baoquan: > > How about move "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE" here, so that we can remove the > > empty reserve_crashkernel(). In fact, xen_pv_domain() is invoked only > > when CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE is enabled before. > > Hi Baoquan: > Did you miss this email? If no reply, I will keep it no change. I checked this patch, and it's no update since I acked it. Moving reserve_crashkernel() into the CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE ifdeffery is also fine to me.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index bb2a0973b98059e..7ae00716a208f82 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -456,7 +456,6 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) crashk_low_res.start = low_base; crashk_low_res.end = low_base + low_size - 1; - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); #endif return 0; } @@ -480,11 +479,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) high = true; } - if (xen_pv_domain()) { - pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); - return; - } - /* 0 means: find the address automatically */ if (!crash_base) { /* @@ -531,7 +525,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) crashk_res.start = crash_base; crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1; - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); } #else static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) @@ -1143,7 +1136,17 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) * Reserve memory for crash kernel after SRAT is parsed so that it * won't consume hotpluggable memory. */ - reserve_crashkernel(); + if (xen_pv_domain()) + pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); + else { + reserve_crashkernel(); +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE + if (crashk_res.end > crashk_res.start) + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res); + if (crashk_low_res.end > crashk_low_res.start) + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res); +#endif + } memblock_find_dma_reserve();