Message ID | 20211222172519.3209478-1-trix@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | firmware: arm_scmi: replace resevered identifiers in macros | expand |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:25:19AM -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > Identifiers starting with __ are resevered. Replace __X with X. > > The arguments to these macros are pointers. The macros only reads > values. There is no need to make copies of the pointers, use them > directly. > Agreed and thanks for the patch. However the original patch was modified and these macros were moved to inline functions[0] after the initial build warnings from the build bot[1]. Sorry my reply to the bot seems to have got lost and didn't make it to the list.
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index b4bbfe89368df..d2fcfa9da931c 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -36,29 +36,14 @@ #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS #include <trace/events/scmi.h> -#define IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(__c, __i) \ - ((__c)->no_completion_irq || (__i)->desc->force_polling) \ - -#define IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(__i) \ -({ \ - bool __ret; \ - typeof(__i) i_ = __i; \ - \ - __ret = ((i_)->desc->ops->poll_done || \ - (i_)->desc->sync_cmds_completed_on_ret); \ - __ret; \ -}) - -#define IS_POLLING_ENABLED(__c, __i) \ -({ \ - bool __ret; \ - typeof(__c) c_ = __c; \ - typeof(__i) i_ = __i; \ - \ - __ret = (IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(c_, i_) && \ - IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(i_)); \ - __ret; \ -}) +#define IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(c, i) \ + ((c)->no_completion_irq || (i)->desc->force_polling) + +#define IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(i) \ + ((i)->desc->ops->poll_done || (i)->desc->sync_cmds_completed_on_ret) + +#define IS_POLLING_ENABLED(c, i) \ + (IS_POLLING_REQUIRED(c, i) && IS_TRANSPORT_POLLING_CAPABLE(i)) enum scmi_error_codes { SCMI_SUCCESS = 0, /* Success */