Message ID | 20220101163956.3344467-2-abel.vesa@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/3] interconnect: imx: Switch from imx_icc_node_adj_desc to fsl, icc-id node assignment | expand |
Hi Abel, On 1.01.22 18:39, Abel Vesa wrote: > The aggregate function will return whatever is the highest > rate for that specific node. The imx_icc_get_bw sets the Adding some more details about why we switch from icc_std_aggregate to imx_icc_aggregate would be nice. > initial avg and peak to 0 in order to avoid setting them to > INT_MAX by the interconnect core. Do we need a Fixes tag for this? I would recommend to split imx_icc_get_bw and imx_icc_aggregate changes into separate patches. These also seem to be unrelated to the imx_icc_node_adj_desc patchset. Thanks, Georgi > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> > --- > > No changes since v1. > > drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > index 34bfc7936387..4d8a2a2d2608 100644 > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > @@ -25,6 +25,23 @@ struct imx_icc_node { > struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req; > }; > > +static int imx_icc_get_bw(struct icc_node *node, u32 *avg, u32 *peak) > +{ > + *avg = 0; > + *peak = 0; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int imx_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw, > + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak) > +{ > + *agg_avg = max(*agg_avg, avg_bw); > + *agg_peak = max(*agg_peak, peak_bw); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int imx_icc_node_set(struct icc_node *node) > { > struct device *dev = node->provider->dev; > @@ -233,7 +250,8 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev, > if (!provider) > return -ENOMEM; > provider->set = imx_icc_set; > - provider->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate; > + provider->get_bw = imx_icc_get_bw; > + provider->aggregate = imx_icc_aggregate; > provider->xlate = of_icc_xlate_onecell; > provider->data = data; > provider->dev = dev;
On 22-01-01 20:26:05, Georgi Djakov wrote: > Hi Abel, > > On 1.01.22 18:39, Abel Vesa wrote: > > The aggregate function will return whatever is the highest > > rate for that specific node. The imx_icc_get_bw sets the > > Adding some more details about why we switch from > icc_std_aggregate to imx_icc_aggregate would be nice. > On a second look, I think I can drop the imx_icc_aggregate and use the icc_std_aggregate instead, as long as I use the peak_bw and forget about the agg_bw. > > initial avg and peak to 0 in order to avoid setting them to > > INT_MAX by the interconnect core. > > Do we need a Fixes tag for this? > Neah, the imx interconnect is not used by any platform yet. > I would recommend to split imx_icc_get_bw and imx_icc_aggregate > changes into separate patches. These also seem to be unrelated to > the imx_icc_node_adj_desc patchset. > Since I can use icc_std_aggregate, the imx_icc_aggregate change will be dropped. > Thanks, > Georgi > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> > > --- > > > > No changes since v1. > > > > drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > > index 34bfc7936387..4d8a2a2d2608 100644 > > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c > > @@ -25,6 +25,23 @@ struct imx_icc_node { > > struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req; > > }; > > +static int imx_icc_get_bw(struct icc_node *node, u32 *avg, u32 *peak) > > +{ > > + *avg = 0; > > + *peak = 0; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int imx_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw, > > + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak) > > +{ > > + *agg_avg = max(*agg_avg, avg_bw); > > + *agg_peak = max(*agg_peak, peak_bw); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int imx_icc_node_set(struct icc_node *node) > > { > > struct device *dev = node->provider->dev; > > @@ -233,7 +250,8 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev, > > if (!provider) > > return -ENOMEM; > > provider->set = imx_icc_set; > > - provider->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate; > > + provider->get_bw = imx_icc_get_bw; > > + provider->aggregate = imx_icc_aggregate; > > provider->xlate = of_icc_xlate_onecell; > > provider->data = data; > > provider->dev = dev; >
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c index 34bfc7936387..4d8a2a2d2608 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c @@ -25,6 +25,23 @@ struct imx_icc_node { struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req; }; +static int imx_icc_get_bw(struct icc_node *node, u32 *avg, u32 *peak) +{ + *avg = 0; + *peak = 0; + + return 0; +} + +static int imx_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw, + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak) +{ + *agg_avg = max(*agg_avg, avg_bw); + *agg_peak = max(*agg_peak, peak_bw); + + return 0; +} + static int imx_icc_node_set(struct icc_node *node) { struct device *dev = node->provider->dev; @@ -233,7 +250,8 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev, if (!provider) return -ENOMEM; provider->set = imx_icc_set; - provider->aggregate = icc_std_aggregate; + provider->get_bw = imx_icc_get_bw; + provider->aggregate = imx_icc_aggregate; provider->xlate = of_icc_xlate_onecell; provider->data = data; provider->dev = dev;
The aggregate function will return whatever is the highest rate for that specific node. The imx_icc_get_bw sets the initial avg and peak to 0 in order to avoid setting them to INT_MAX by the interconnect core. Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com> --- No changes since v1. drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)