From patchwork Mon Mar 7 09:19:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 12771454 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9BEC433EF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:57:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9WJp+20xb5bhjy2WipVqXLR0N1FpQGd06Qos+5DoFyA=; b=xOBOUFcppgrxDi oNeWz9mzEc3niz4Pyyyt4yNqfr8IMe/DOkdCByipBWPhebDXl//S5ISBgQ0uGg68bwolsmBU03K+l B51T/+p273tQnDu2q9wr9s7kWqiPYL0oMukoQSKp19P1ca//ilDG/0TI8drmVBu5L2dEbjds7xCRW tm3R+qMMnaMME+AplhFnhTyvQ+gkiC/L18mJQzsC5S5+GmliMElKJ2foEK89hF6mtasERDmbG392r Wf36vNnJsIg4c64YLz+RIWgxjB0GdVX7y1+S1pcQffBIwioxwOSVU+t/ZtlPhowvZGykpoWe+feBS Mle/xcCLB0W9B776mxEg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRA6C-00GvEf-9W; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:56:16 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRA68-00GvDN-6T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 09:56:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D6060BB5; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9FCFC340E9; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:56:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1646646971; bh=CaKtX6RI701ZDx4Bn/ja5BTKe+943YPz+gM9MRC0pRo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DgFVMygNKQAARiySDYKZufzbXfQm35Ze16rjflPyD7hnm0MA2IZrXmXPVw48nSpWa 3FaKxDuM2ULkkCTXQDw94yjjSUq6eioELhzMNU5DmBCLnt9ad1FRzrfh4GA8okJ1IP 5CM0tz+Z7XW/7pkqyH7xUq9hoc6NbobyhA54A7nA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Igor Zhbanov , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@armlinux.org.uk, "Russell King (Oracle)" Subject: [PATCH 5.16 110/186] ARM: 9182/1: mmu: fix returns from early_param() and __setup() functions Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:19:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20220307091657.154452123@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220307091654.092878898@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220307091654.092878898@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220307_015612_284302_F54D810C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Randy Dunlap commit 7b83299e5b9385943a857d59e15cba270df20d7e upstream. early_param() handlers should return 0 on success. __setup() handlers should return 1 on success, i.e., the parameter has been handled. A return of 0 would cause the "option=value" string to be added to init's environment strings, polluting it. ../arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function 'test_early_cachepolicy': ../arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:215:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] ../arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function 'test_noalign_setup': ../arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:221:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] Fixes: b849a60e0903 ("ARM: make cr_alignment read-only #ifndef CONFIG_CPU_CP15") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Reported-by: Igor Zhbanov Cc: Uwe Kleine-König Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: patches@armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -212,12 +212,14 @@ early_param("ecc", early_ecc); static int __init early_cachepolicy(char *p) { pr_warn("cachepolicy kernel parameter not supported without cp15\n"); + return 0; } early_param("cachepolicy", early_cachepolicy); static int __init noalign_setup(char *__unused) { pr_warn("noalign kernel parameter not supported without cp15\n"); + return 1; } __setup("noalign", noalign_setup);