| Message ID | 20220408110920.3809225-2-alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] thermal: imx8mm: Add hwmon support | expand |
On 08/04/2022 13:09, Alexander Stein wrote: > Outputs like this where -1 is printed as unsigned is somewhat misleading > thermal thermal_zone1: Trip3[type=0,temp=48000]:trend=4,throttle=1 > thermal cooling_device3: cur_state=1 > thermal cooling_device3: old_target=-1, target=2 > thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=1 > thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=2 > thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=18446744073709551615 > thermal cooling_device3: set to state 2 > > With THERMAL_NO_TARGET assigning -1 as unsigned it make sense to print > the target as signed integer, even if the type is actually unsigned. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> > --- > An alternative would be to change thermal_instance::target from unsigned > long to long, but this would entail a lot of API & driver changes as well > which looks less intriguing. > > drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > index 3edd047e144f..0d0da6670267 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void __thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) > > /* Make sure cdev enters the deepest cooling state */ > list_for_each_entry(instance, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node) { > - dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%lu\n", > + dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%ld\n", > instance->tz->id, instance->target); > if (instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET) > continue; Actually you pointed out something fuzzy in the target values. The unsigned long type for the target and THERMAL_NO_TARGET are not compatible. It would be much simpler to have THERMAL_NO_TARGET = 0 which semantically makes more sense than a negative value.
On 08/04/2022 13:09, Alexander Stein wrote: >> Outputs like this where -1 is printed as unsigned is somewhat misleading >> thermal thermal_zone1: Trip3[type=0,temp=48000]:trend=4,throttle=1 >> thermal cooling_device3: cur_state=1 >> thermal cooling_device3: old_target=-1, target=2 >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=1 >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=2 >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=18446744073709551615 >> thermal cooling_device3: set to state 2 >> >> With THERMAL_NO_TARGET assigning -1 as unsigned it make sense to print >> the target as signed integer, even if the type is actually unsigned. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> >> --- >> An alternative would be to change thermal_instance::target from unsigned >> long to long, but this would entail a lot of API & driver changes as well >> which looks less intriguing. >> >> drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c >> index 3edd047e144f..0d0da6670267 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c >> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void __thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) >> >> /* Make sure cdev enters the deepest cooling state */ >> list_for_each_entry(instance, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node) { >> - dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%lu\n", >> + dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%ld\n", >> instance->tz->id, instance->target); >> if (instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET) >> continue; > >Actually you pointed out something fuzzy in the target values. > >The unsigned long type for the target and THERMAL_NO_TARGET are not >compatible. > >It would be much simpler to have THERMAL_NO_TARGET = 0 which >semantically makes more sense than a negative value. The compare of unsigned long and negative int is bad idea. But there is serious problem introduced by "thermal: core: Add notifications call in the framework" patch. When system resumes from mem suspend first time (this happen only on 1st resume), the thermal notification is sent to drivers with value of 0 (meaning system is no longer hot). This is due to the fact target is init to 0 and when there is only 1 cooling device; it gets out of the loop (due to continue;) with target still set to 0 and calls thermal_cdev_set_cur_state(cdev, target). From there thermal_notify_cdev_state_update is called with argument of 0 which notifies drivers with value of 0. May be "unsigned long target" should be initialized to THERMAL_NO_TARGET instead of 0. [ 29.107048] OOM killer enabled. [ 29.110225] Restarting tasks ... done. [ 29.124816] thermal cooling_device0: zone0->target=18446744073709551615 [ 29.138388] GPU0: Hot alarm is canceled. [ 29.145399] thermal cooling_device0: set to state 0 [ 29.198954] PM: suspend exit
Hello, Am Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2022, 00:48:00 CEST schrieb Nitin Garg: > On 08/04/2022 13:09, Alexander Stein wrote: > >> Outputs like this where -1 is printed as unsigned is somewhat misleading > >> > >> thermal thermal_zone1: Trip3[type=0,temp=48000]:trend=4,throttle=1 > >> thermal cooling_device3: cur_state=1 > >> thermal cooling_device3: old_target=-1, target=2 > >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=1 > >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=2 > >> thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=18446744073709551615 > >> thermal cooling_device3: set to state 2 > >> > >> With THERMAL_NO_TARGET assigning -1 as unsigned it make sense to print > >> the target as signed integer, even if the type is actually unsigned. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> > >> --- > >> An alternative would be to change thermal_instance::target from unsigned > >> long to long, but this would entail a lot of API & driver changes as well > >> which looks less intriguing. > >> > >> drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > >> b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c index 3edd047e144f..0d0da6670267 > >> 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c > >> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void __thermal_cdev_update(struct > >> thermal_cooling_device *cdev)>> > >> /* Make sure cdev enters the deepest cooling state */ > >> list_for_each_entry(instance, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node) { > >> > >> - dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%lu\n", > >> + dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%ld\n", > >> > >> instance->tz->id, instance->target); > >> > >> if (instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET) > >> > >> continue; > > > >Actually you pointed out something fuzzy in the target values. > > > >The unsigned long type for the target and THERMAL_NO_TARGET are not > >compatible. > > > >It would be much simpler to have THERMAL_NO_TARGET = 0 which > >semantically makes more sense than a negative value. Is it identical? Apparently target value is used differently in each governor. At least for gov_bang_bang 'THERMAL_NO_TARGET = 0' is no difference. Im not so sure about gov_step_wise. > The compare of unsigned long and negative int is bad idea. Well, THERMAL_NO_TARGET actually is an unsigned long (-1UL), so the comparison is unsigned long to unsigned long, so it should not be an issue. But this implies that printing the target as unsigned int, results in a huge number, not immediately recognizable as -1, which I tried to address here. > But there is serious problem introduced by "thermal: core: Add notifications > call in the framework" patch. When system resumes from mem suspend first > time (this happen only on 1st resume), the thermal notification is sent to > drivers with value of 0 (meaning system is no longer hot). This is due to > the fact target is init to 0 and when there is only 1 cooling device; it > gets out of the loop (due to continue;) with target still set to 0 and > calls thermal_cdev_set_cur_state(cdev, target). From there > thermal_notify_cdev_state_update is called with argument of 0 which > notifies drivers with value of 0. > > May be "unsigned long target" should be initialized to THERMAL_NO_TARGET > instead of 0. > > [ 29.107048] OOM killer enabled. > [ 29.110225] Restarting tasks ... done. > [ 29.124816] thermal cooling_device0: zone0->target=18446744073709551615 > [ 29.138388] GPU0: Hot alarm is canceled. > [ 29.145399] thermal cooling_device0: set to state 0 > [ 29.198954] PM: suspend exit Is it legal to pass THERMAL_NO_TARGET to .set_cur_state()? At least pwm-fan will return -EINVAL in this case. Alexander
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c index 3edd047e144f..0d0da6670267 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void __thermal_cdev_update(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) /* Make sure cdev enters the deepest cooling state */ list_for_each_entry(instance, &cdev->thermal_instances, cdev_node) { - dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%lu\n", + dev_dbg(&cdev->device, "zone%d->target=%ld\n", instance->tz->id, instance->target); if (instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET) continue;
Outputs like this where -1 is printed as unsigned is somewhat misleading thermal thermal_zone1: Trip3[type=0,temp=48000]:trend=4,throttle=1 thermal cooling_device3: cur_state=1 thermal cooling_device3: old_target=-1, target=2 thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=1 thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=2 thermal cooling_device3: zone1->target=18446744073709551615 thermal cooling_device3: set to state 2 With THERMAL_NO_TARGET assigning -1 as unsigned it make sense to print the target as signed integer, even if the type is actually unsigned. Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> --- An alternative would be to change thermal_instance::target from unsigned long to long, but this would entail a lot of API & driver changes as well which looks less intriguing. drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)