@@ -237,10 +237,19 @@ static void __get_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
*
* The double-underscore version must only be called if you know the task
* can't be preempted.
+ *
+ * On RT kernels local_bh_disable() is not sufficient because it only
+ * serializes soft interrupt related sections via a local lock, but stays
+ * preemptible. Disabling preemption is the right choice here as bottom
+ * half processing is always in thread context on RT kernels so it
+ * implicitly prevents bottom half processing as well.
*/
static void get_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
{
- local_bh_disable();
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ local_bh_disable();
+ else
+ preempt_disable();
__get_cpu_fpsimd_context();
}
@@ -261,7 +270,10 @@ static void __put_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
static void put_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
{
__put_cpu_fpsimd_context();
- local_bh_enable();
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ local_bh_enable();
+ else
+ preempt_enable();
}
static bool have_cpu_fpsimd_context(void)
Non RT kernels need to protect FPU against preemption and bottom half processing. This is achieved by disabling bottom halves via local_bh_disable() which implictly disables preemption. On RT kernels this protection mechanism is not sufficient because local_bh_disable() does not disable preemption. It serializes bottom half related processing via a CPU local lock. As bottom halves are running always in thread context on RT kernels disabling preemption is the proper choice as it implicitly prevents bottom half processing. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)