From patchwork Thu May 19 13:42:04 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 12855218 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4ECC433FE for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 14:52:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zPDKUeET2M2X6A6xlc0OwyYyt4KkT6KXkj9bLJqWlug=; b=UHpCb1+VDU4vtr 0NLW8GvAQdCqxwaZUiJrv79hAeBAg+RRU3Xchx1sTLznCi8nOAtLGNUj6MFU/uLdXEgvCX9wpnEmV Ghlz649d4yEHvh9X6W2pOj56IXwmtHJzkWcWP2abC4ZqSKwMcg2Xem9IZ9ubw1kEdjL6SEfZMOEkR MvkcNjW57BlWPGg8DgZHKMGMLjebyxaJ1jz3XEiq3tfseHWDDQfTHYHv80zE98YqOBFPDUwl+QJIK llIyzF7A5Ix0fLcTF/7XpTe8U+R4c3j/6JgFtdSmc0MaACt+aIvdMp19pQz3QYMAPLUsM+3csqpVy bu7U9DXD2VnEQtT42wpQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nrhUX-007b7Z-3s; Thu, 19 May 2022 14:51:05 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nrgVo-0077qF-Ok for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:48:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC2DB824B1; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1902C34100; Thu, 19 May 2022 13:48:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652968098; bh=OyFqMF74W3M0ZJLxEHZqbx0RH1+q2b7I75jA3NgE6M0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sz4Qvp4rwr5g8e+HWqFvIn6o9WgbBHyu5HzK01BvWg2WbaepceHeDw2Oz4wrGY8uO aM7RkaxjPEp0BlTRFMv2G7K2U6Y54m/l1hoIiKuOssQGg1p4i8o4JRpOE4JkhEUjtu y1viTLNwKan5or5hlpGg7/3bb5GdQ2sSqlFRtVt8Kw26H188iSXMKY6TNLO9J0IR0v 09XbcaTj4KmKVntmkWy3hOmTiJBA1MJbGs/mTlm1mDdvISFqM46gbapaqFy9TNpQsw e3bHaqnQUCzRzxlAq/EASYphq1ah49F36RW2faizlxHl00uW96cYtRQcQ49lHdXwm4 jsg7IDRuYuYAg== From: Will Deacon To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Sean Christopherson , Alexandru Elisei , Andy Lutomirski , Catalin Marinas , James Morse , Chao Peng , Quentin Perret , Suzuki K Poulose , Michael Roth , Mark Rutland , Fuad Tabba , Oliver Upton , Marc Zyngier , kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 89/89] Documentation: KVM: Add some documentation for Protected KVM on arm64 Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:42:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20220519134204.5379-90-will@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20220519134204.5379-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20220519134204.5379-1-will@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220519_064821_158561_38E3FE53 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add some initial documentation for the Protected KVM (pKVM) feature on arm64, describing the user ABI for creating protected VMs as well as their limitations. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 +- Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst | 96 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 63a764ec7fec..b8841a969f59 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -2437,7 +2437,9 @@ protected guests. protected: nVHE-based mode with support for guests whose - state is kept private from the host. + state is kept private from the host. See + Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst for more + information about this mode of operation. Defaults to VHE/nVHE based on hardware support. Setting mode to "protected" will disable kexec and hibernation diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst index b4067da3fcb6..49c388df662a 100644 --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ ARM hyp-abi hypercalls + pkvm psci pvtime ptp_kvm diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..64f099a5ac2e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pkvm.rst @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +Protected virtual machines (pKVM) +================================= + +Introduction +------------ + +Protected KVM (pKVM) is a KVM/arm64 extension which uses the two-stage +translation capability of the Armv8 MMU to isolate guest memory from the host +system. This allows for the creation of a confidential computing environment +without relying on whizz-bang features in hardware, but still allowing room for +complementary technologies such as memory encryption and hardware-backed +attestation. + +The major implementation change brought about by pKVM is that the hypervisor +code running at EL2 is now largely independent of (and isolated from) the rest +of the host kernel running at EL1 and therefore additional hypercalls are +introduced to manage manipulation of guest stage-2 page tables, creation of VM +data structures and reclamation of memory on teardown. An immediate consequence +of this change is that the host itself runs with an identity mapping enabled +at stage-2, providing the hypervisor code with a mechanism to restrict host +access to an arbitrary physical page. + +Enabling pKVM +------------- + +The pKVM hypervisor is enabled by booting the host kernel at EL2 with +"``kvm-arm.mode=protected``" on the command-line. Once enabled, VMs can be spawned +in either protected or non-protected state, although the hypervisor is still +responsible for managing most of the VM metadata in either case. + +Limitations +----------- + +Enabling pKVM places some significant limitations on KVM guests, regardless of +whether they are spawned in protected state. It is therefore recommended only +to enable pKVM if protected VMs are required, with non-protected state acting +primarily as a debug and development aid. + +If you're still keen, then here is an incomplete list of caveats that apply +to all VMs running under pKVM: + +- Guest memory cannot be file-backed (with the exception of shmem/memfd) and is + pinned as it is mapped into the guest. This prevents the host from + swapping-out, migrating, merging or generally doing anything useful with the + guest pages. It also requires that the VMM has either ``CAP_IPC_LOCK`` or + sufficient ``RLIMIT_MEMLOCK`` to account for this pinned memory. + +- GICv2 is not supported and therefore GICv3 hardware is required in order + to expose a virtual GICv3 to the guest. + +- Read-only memslots are unsupported and therefore dirty logging cannot be + enabled. + +- Memslot configuration is fixed once a VM has started running, with subsequent + move or deletion requests being rejected with ``-EPERM``. + +- There are probably many others. + +Since the host is unable to tear down the hypervisor when pKVM is enabled, +hibernation (``CONFIG_HIBERNATION``) and kexec (``CONFIG_KEXEC``) will fail +with ``-EBUSY``. + +If you are not happy with these limitations, then please don't enable pKVM :) + +VM creation +----------- + +When pKVM is enabled, protected VMs can be created by specifying the +``KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_PROTECTED`` flag in the machine type identifier parameter +passed to ``KVM_CREATE_VM``. + +Protected VMs are instantiated according to a fixed vCPU configuration +described by the ID register definitions in +``arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pkvm.h``. Only a subset of the architectural +features that may be available to the host are exposed to the guest and the +capabilities advertised by ``KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION`` are limited accordingly, +with the vCPU registers being initialised to their architecturally-defined +values. + +Where not defined by the architecture, the registers of a protected vCPU +are reset to zero with the exception of the PC and X0 which can be set +either by the ``KVM_SET_ONE_REG`` interface or by a call to PSCI ``CPU_ON``. + +VM runtime +---------- + +By default, memory pages mapped into a protected guest are inaccessible to the +host and any attempt by the host to access such a page will result in the +injection of an abort at EL1 by the hypervisor. For accesses originating from +EL0, the host will then terminate the current task with a ``SIGSEGV``. + +pKVM exposes additional hypercalls to protected guests, primarily for the +purpose of establishing shared-memory regions with the host for communication +and I/O. These hypercalls are documented in hypercalls.rst.