Message ID | 20220616170347.2800771-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks | expand |
On 2022-06-16 18:03, Cristian Marussi wrote: > A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock > should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step) > returned all in one reply message. > > This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in > the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking > carefully the returned payload size. > > While at that cleanup a stale debug printout. I know we're testing on the same platform so it's of limited value, but for the record this does indeed make my display work again, so FWIW: Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Thanks for the quick turnaround! Robin. > Fixes: 7bc7caafe6b1 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in the clock protocol") > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 1 + > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > index c7a83f6e38e5..3ed7ae0d6781 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int rate_cmp_func(const void *_r1, const void *_r2) > } > > struct scmi_clk_ipriv { > + struct device *dev; > u32 clk_id; > struct scmi_clock_info *clk; > }; > @@ -223,6 +224,29 @@ iter_clk_describe_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st, > st->num_returned = NUM_RETURNED(flags); > p->clk->rate_discrete = RATE_DISCRETE(flags); > > + /* Warn about out of spec replies ... */ > + if (!p->clk->rate_discrete && > + (st->num_returned != 3 || st->num_remaining != 0)) { > + dev_warn(p->dev, > + "Out-of-spec CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES reply for %s - returned:%d remaining:%d rx_len:%zd\n", > + p->clk->name, st->num_returned, st->num_remaining, > + st->rx_len); > + > + /* > + * A known quirk: a triplet is returned but num_returned != 3 > + * Check for a safe payload size and fix. > + */ > + if (st->num_returned != 3 && st->num_remaining == 0 && > + st->rx_len == sizeof(*r) + sizeof(__le32) * 2 * 3) { > + st->num_returned = 3; > + st->num_remaining = 0; > + } else { > + dev_err(p->dev, > + "Cannot fix out-of-spec reply !\n"); > + return -EPROTO; > + } > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -255,7 +279,6 @@ iter_clk_describe_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > > *rate = RATE_TO_U64(r->rate[st->loop_idx]); > p->clk->list.num_rates++; > - //XXX dev_dbg(ph->dev, "Rate %llu Hz\n", *rate); > } > > return ret; > @@ -275,6 +298,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id, > struct scmi_clk_ipriv cpriv = { > .clk_id = clk_id, > .clk = clk, > + .dev = ph->dev, > }; > > iter = ph->hops->iter_response_init(ph, &ops, SCMI_MAX_NUM_RATES, > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index c1922bd650ae..8b7ac6663d57 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -1223,6 +1223,7 @@ static int scmi_iterator_run(void *iter) > if (ret) > break; > > + st->rx_len = i->t->rx.len; > ret = iops->update_state(st, i->resp, i->priv); > if (ret) > break; > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > index c679f3fb8718..51c31379f9b3 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ struct scmi_protocol_handle { > * @max_resources: Maximum acceptable number of items, configured by the caller > * depending on the underlying resources that it is querying. > * @loop_idx: The iterator loop index in the current multi-part reply. > + * @rx_len: Size in bytes of the currenly processed message; it can be used by > + * the user of the iterator to verify a reply size. > * @priv: Optional pointer to some additional state-related private data setup > * by the caller during the iterations. > */ > @@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ struct scmi_iterator_state { > unsigned int num_remaining; > unsigned int max_resources; > unsigned int loop_idx; > + size_t rx_len; > void *priv; > }; >
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 07:02:49PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2022-06-16 18:03, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock > > should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step) > > returned all in one reply message. > > > > This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in > > the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking > > carefully the returned payload size. > > > > While at that cleanup a stale debug printout. > > I know we're testing on the same platform so it's of limited value, but for > the record this does indeed make my display work again, so FWIW: > > Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > > Thanks for the quick turnaround! > Robin. > Thanks Robin. Testing is never enough :P Thanks, Cristian > > Fixes: 7bc7caafe6b1 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in the clock protocol") > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> > > --- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 1 + > > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h | 3 +++ > > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > index c7a83f6e38e5..3ed7ae0d6781 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c > > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int rate_cmp_func(const void *_r1, const void *_r2) > > } > > struct scmi_clk_ipriv { > > + struct device *dev; > > u32 clk_id; > > struct scmi_clock_info *clk; > > }; > > @@ -223,6 +224,29 @@ iter_clk_describe_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st, > > st->num_returned = NUM_RETURNED(flags); > > p->clk->rate_discrete = RATE_DISCRETE(flags); > > + /* Warn about out of spec replies ... */ > > + if (!p->clk->rate_discrete && > > + (st->num_returned != 3 || st->num_remaining != 0)) { > > + dev_warn(p->dev, > > + "Out-of-spec CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES reply for %s - returned:%d remaining:%d rx_len:%zd\n", > > + p->clk->name, st->num_returned, st->num_remaining, > > + st->rx_len); > > + > > + /* > > + * A known quirk: a triplet is returned but num_returned != 3 > > + * Check for a safe payload size and fix. > > + */ > > + if (st->num_returned != 3 && st->num_remaining == 0 && > > + st->rx_len == sizeof(*r) + sizeof(__le32) * 2 * 3) { > > + st->num_returned = 3; > > + st->num_remaining = 0; > > + } else { > > + dev_err(p->dev, > > + "Cannot fix out-of-spec reply !\n"); > > + return -EPROTO; > > + } > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > @@ -255,7 +279,6 @@ iter_clk_describe_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, > > *rate = RATE_TO_U64(r->rate[st->loop_idx]); > > p->clk->list.num_rates++; > > - //XXX dev_dbg(ph->dev, "Rate %llu Hz\n", *rate); > > } > > return ret; > > @@ -275,6 +298,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id, > > struct scmi_clk_ipriv cpriv = { > > .clk_id = clk_id, > > .clk = clk, > > + .dev = ph->dev, > > }; > > iter = ph->hops->iter_response_init(ph, &ops, SCMI_MAX_NUM_RATES, > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > index c1922bd650ae..8b7ac6663d57 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > > @@ -1223,6 +1223,7 @@ static int scmi_iterator_run(void *iter) > > if (ret) > > break; > > + st->rx_len = i->t->rx.len; > > ret = iops->update_state(st, i->resp, i->priv); > > if (ret) > > break; > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > > index c679f3fb8718..51c31379f9b3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h > > @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ struct scmi_protocol_handle { > > * @max_resources: Maximum acceptable number of items, configured by the caller > > * depending on the underlying resources that it is querying. > > * @loop_idx: The iterator loop index in the current multi-part reply. > > + * @rx_len: Size in bytes of the currenly processed message; it can be used by > > + * the user of the iterator to verify a reply size. > > * @priv: Optional pointer to some additional state-related private data setup > > * by the caller during the iterations. > > */ > > @@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ struct scmi_iterator_state { > > unsigned int num_remaining; > > unsigned int max_resources; > > unsigned int loop_idx; > > + size_t rx_len; > > void *priv; > > };
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:03:47 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock > should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step) > returned all in one reply message. > > This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in > the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking > carefully the returned payload size. > > [...] Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks! [1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/754f04cac3 -- Regards, Sudeep
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c index c7a83f6e38e5..3ed7ae0d6781 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int rate_cmp_func(const void *_r1, const void *_r2) } struct scmi_clk_ipriv { + struct device *dev; u32 clk_id; struct scmi_clock_info *clk; }; @@ -223,6 +224,29 @@ iter_clk_describe_update_state(struct scmi_iterator_state *st, st->num_returned = NUM_RETURNED(flags); p->clk->rate_discrete = RATE_DISCRETE(flags); + /* Warn about out of spec replies ... */ + if (!p->clk->rate_discrete && + (st->num_returned != 3 || st->num_remaining != 0)) { + dev_warn(p->dev, + "Out-of-spec CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES reply for %s - returned:%d remaining:%d rx_len:%zd\n", + p->clk->name, st->num_returned, st->num_remaining, + st->rx_len); + + /* + * A known quirk: a triplet is returned but num_returned != 3 + * Check for a safe payload size and fix. + */ + if (st->num_returned != 3 && st->num_remaining == 0 && + st->rx_len == sizeof(*r) + sizeof(__le32) * 2 * 3) { + st->num_returned = 3; + st->num_remaining = 0; + } else { + dev_err(p->dev, + "Cannot fix out-of-spec reply !\n"); + return -EPROTO; + } + } + return 0; } @@ -255,7 +279,6 @@ iter_clk_describe_process_response(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, *rate = RATE_TO_U64(r->rate[st->loop_idx]); p->clk->list.num_rates++; - //XXX dev_dbg(ph->dev, "Rate %llu Hz\n", *rate); } return ret; @@ -275,6 +298,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id, struct scmi_clk_ipriv cpriv = { .clk_id = clk_id, .clk = clk, + .dev = ph->dev, }; iter = ph->hops->iter_response_init(ph, &ops, SCMI_MAX_NUM_RATES, diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index c1922bd650ae..8b7ac6663d57 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -1223,6 +1223,7 @@ static int scmi_iterator_run(void *iter) if (ret) break; + st->rx_len = i->t->rx.len; ret = iops->update_state(st, i->resp, i->priv); if (ret) break; diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h index c679f3fb8718..51c31379f9b3 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ struct scmi_protocol_handle { * @max_resources: Maximum acceptable number of items, configured by the caller * depending on the underlying resources that it is querying. * @loop_idx: The iterator loop index in the current multi-part reply. + * @rx_len: Size in bytes of the currenly processed message; it can be used by + * the user of the iterator to verify a reply size. * @priv: Optional pointer to some additional state-related private data setup * by the caller during the iterations. */ @@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ struct scmi_iterator_state { unsigned int num_remaining; unsigned int max_resources; unsigned int loop_idx; + size_t rx_len; void *priv; };
A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step) returned all in one reply message. This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking carefully the returned payload size. While at that cleanup a stale debug printout. Fixes: 7bc7caafe6b1 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Use common iterators in the clock protocol") Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 1 + drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/protocols.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)