diff mbox series

[v2,1/5] pinctrl: mediatek: add generic driving setup property on mt8192

Message ID 20220624133700.15487-2-guodong.liu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series pinctrl: mediatek: add driver support driving and resistance property on mt8192 | expand

Commit Message

Guodong Liu June 24, 2022, 1:36 p.m. UTC
1. The dt-binding expects that drive-strength arguments be passed
in mA, but the driver was expecting raw values. And that this
commit changes the driver so that it is aligned with the binding.
2. This commit provides generic driving setup, which support
2/4/6/8/10/12/14/16mA driving, original driver just set raw data
setup setting when use drive-strength property.

Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8192.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Nícolas F. R. A. Prado June 24, 2022, 3:52 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Guodong,

please see comments below.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 09:36:56PM +0800, Guodong Liu wrote:
> 1. The dt-binding expects that drive-strength arguments be passed
> in mA, but the driver was expecting raw values. And that this
> commit changes the driver so that it is aligned with the binding.
> 2. This commit provides generic driving setup, which support
> 2/4/6/8/10/12/14/16mA driving, original driver just set raw data
> setup setting when use drive-strength property.

This commit message is a bit confusing, I suggest using the following commit
message instead:

The dt-binding expects the drive-strength arguments to be passed in mA, but the
driver was using callbacks that expect raw values instead. Change the callbacks
for the ones that operate on mA values, so that the driver is in accordance to
the dt-binding.

The drive-strength property requiring values in mA is the standard and other
MediaTek SoCs of the same generation already do the same, so this change avoids
mt8192 having a non-standard property.

There are no current upstream users of this driver, so this change doesn't cause
any regression.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com>

Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

Thanks,
Nícolas
Linus Walleij June 25, 2022, 11:26 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 3:37 PM Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com> wrote:

> 1. The dt-binding expects that drive-strength arguments be passed
> in mA, but the driver was expecting raw values. And that this
> commit changes the driver so that it is aligned with the binding.
> 2. This commit provides generic driving setup, which support
> 2/4/6/8/10/12/14/16mA driving, original driver just set raw data
> setup setting when use drive-strength property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com>

All patches 1-5 applied, thanks!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Guodong Liu June 26, 2022, 4:45 a.m. UTC | #3
-----Original Message-----
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <
robh+dt@kernel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, Sean
Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, 
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: mediatek: add generic driving
setup property on mt8192
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:52:24 -0400

Hi Guodong,

please see comments below.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 09:36:56PM +0800, Guodong Liu wrote:
> 1. The dt-binding expects that drive-strength arguments be passed
> in mA, but the driver was expecting raw values. And that this
> commit changes the driver so that it is aligned with the binding.
> 2. This commit provides generic driving setup, which support
> 2/4/6/8/10/12/14/16mA driving, original driver just set raw data
> setup setting when use drive-strength property.

This commit message is a bit confusing, I suggest using the following
commit
message instead:

The dt-binding expects the drive-strength arguments to be passed in mA,
but the
driver was using callbacks that expect raw values instead. Change the
callbacks
for the ones that operate on mA values, so that the driver is in
accordance to
the dt-binding.

The drive-strength property requiring values in mA is the standard and
other
MediaTek SoCs of the same generation already do the same, so this
change avoids
mt8192 having a non-standard property.

There are no current upstream users of this driver, so this change
doesn't cause
any regression.

Fixed in next patch, thanks!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <guodong.liu@mediatek.com>

Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

Thanks,
Nícolas
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8192.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8192.c
index acccde9262ba..2421a12fc573 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8192.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8192.c
@@ -1372,8 +1372,8 @@  static const struct mtk_pin_soc mt8192_data = {
 	.gpio_m = 0,
 	.bias_set_combo = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_combo,
 	.bias_get_combo = mtk_pinconf_bias_get_combo,
-	.drive_set = mtk_pinconf_drive_set_raw,
-	.drive_get = mtk_pinconf_drive_get_raw,
+	.drive_set = mtk_pinconf_drive_set_rev1,
+	.drive_get = mtk_pinconf_drive_get_rev1,
 	.adv_pull_get = mtk_pinconf_adv_pull_get,
 	.adv_pull_set = mtk_pinconf_adv_pull_set,
 	.adv_drive_get = mtk_pinconf_adv_drive_get,