| Message ID | 20221116170335.2341003-3-qperret@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM: arm64: FF-A proxy for pKVM | expand |
Hi Quentin, On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > > This is consistent with the other comments in the struct. > Not sure how that happened :). Anyways, Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later. The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself. I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible. Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts. -- Regards, Sudeep
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:53:08AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > > From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > > > > This is consistent with the other comments in the struct. > > > Not sure how that happened :). Anyways, > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup > to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later. > The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the > driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself. > > I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts > or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes > are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible. > > Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't > have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts. You're asking me to merge my own patches? Of course I can do that :D Cheers, Will
diff --git a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h index daff44d777fa..c87aeecaa9b2 100644 --- a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h +++ b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h @@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ struct ffa_mem_region_attributes { */ #define FFA_MEM_RETRIEVE_SELF_BORROWER BIT(0) u8 flag; - u32 composite_off; /* * Offset in bytes from the start of the outer `ffa_memory_region` to * an `struct ffa_mem_region_addr_range`. */ + u32 composite_off; u64 reserved; };