From patchwork Sat Feb 11 03:15:04 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reiji Watanabe X-Patchwork-Id: 13136837 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A577C05027 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 03:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID: References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=A/KqFTp18o7NuqiT/eHKz+x4tFdDatRbHJKyl7hmSZ8=; b=Qs3hwxamBT5bj2cRlep4Mi+zyd kfRTnCWHcxkH/RufoZzomhGP/Em+6hM9Iz3K3LK7xpQU6VceYCVWX4kTOp0HbDeZaQ1k4HJJ/XCe/ J6qftAudX+S7JXm9ByM89fXZ/CaIHddhJCBRk+h0bQLBjEwo3AGFD4Omk1sMN+RyeHg5lJI/n3wKd E9S9hImIH5qfSZ78+aGwzkR72V/c/RYaDg68n8lS8m4A4JF0xCQLcvvR4shNht9Ozim16Ll+syXVc S+C8kekCw0E4xC/vpszRVGzAJzARijXqSPDYGcwMrUajyMdNA/hzIx/WuBuAoS7hQusB0zx2qmkKQ ahFcGJCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQgQR-008SJr-2I; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 03:19:44 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-x1149.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1149]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pQgNk-008QuL-42 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 03:16:57 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-x1149.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-52ed582a847so27269507b3.1 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:16:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1bRGCc7MsFaprXLfNHznGO5xVN7EZGAeKRB9FEt/wUQ=; b=r+Ek3hX5HBksVBYFXuT5LKRg8dSNAkGwYyYAp8KSlY0acF6zFiKZwoav9KeTkHV4o4 p76qqJOVqItOR7W2SAPQIjc0ooBZNB0YNwcAVg5dXOGUTOaGM2Jztoq+2CS9lrhvoQzE dTfyRhNW7k8ti20TdZUYr9B7mOLpnccCGHmvKH4Mh9Q5fhjRTBi35o+actS9KUwVub7s EeCTdZTHQCde0WD9YMGfsqLY9WUsQp7T4RJnGhu3lbE/FHtDAoSR9bKjUxGvAmbzsvVT HtfrQasnLImte4XbphwEjipOcXymDZ9+AhQOkU43kXtLVOeAUqN7MEq4pO/FGiY/DacX aK1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1bRGCc7MsFaprXLfNHznGO5xVN7EZGAeKRB9FEt/wUQ=; b=3e1MSTjJrK5hX34PWHQMRwyLyyXACrgt1gCxelSJunZIfCo6dxEqY8tq9EHS3ieAMo 9wyYs/vyeTixZYkcxlEpGv0OSMLKXIFnPNpmQ/W1JUf9FTBLHdxX+ETrOV2FCP4NK0QV M0fXfG3ECst1Rkxf9fhXlGGe3mnRysKOUNMkU/Hhckfq5Wqox3K8MDdCVxaNZuPtjNve iwrYDH+osXlczx0DTYWb8c1nVJ+QEVneM1LezEAKBLeT4SnH0P6zqp9QBT4drQO9ZkrQ nuOc9BymqVeS5sG4pfGmZ0/hcRhS0KsZz176l3m25/SHE2ZLsbP4dq9zwYH1JZN2hI97 Gpxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVWnBQYuzQ+DLGZUxjBoo48kQnclDfCwTNZSuTblUq/2vIXdX3D M2lzYTkvaAqYETdHhFPfQuOLDMmJmNo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+3Dwf8ejvqUtrOGkBbqBbZmxC5JOSriu1PcqoRmSqOpks8B6IZauKSpnW2M+D407ZkXS+0ly2VO2s= X-Received: from reijiw-west4.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:20:ed76:c0a8:aa1]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a5b:44d:0:b0:8ff:7d68:226f with SMTP id s13-20020a5b044d000000b008ff7d68226fmr183894ybp.575.1676085414690; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:16:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:15:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20230211031506.4159098-1-reijiw@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230211031506.4159098-1-reijiw@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog Message-ID: <20230211031506.4159098-13-reijiw@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 12/14] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Zenghui Yu , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Ricardo Koller , Jing Zhang , Raghavendra Rao Anata , Shaoqin Huang , Reiji Watanabe X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230210_191656_191039_A58D8ABD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Introduce vpmu_counter_access test for arm64 platforms. The test configures PMUv3 for a vCPU, sets PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU, and check if the guest can consistently see the same number of the PMU event counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets. This test case is done with each of the PMCR_EL0.N values from 0 to 31 (With the PMCR_EL0.N values greater than the host value, the test expects KVM_SET_ONE_REG for the PMCR_EL0 to fail). Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index 1750f91dd936..b27fea0ce591 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vcpu_width_config TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_init TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_irq +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vpmu_counter_access TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7a4333f64dae --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * vpmu_counter_access - Test vPMU event counter access + * + * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC. + * + * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event + * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets. + * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host. + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */ +#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1) + +/* + * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of + * event counters. + * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N. + */ +static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n) +{ + uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n; + + GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS); + + pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0); + pmcr_n = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr); + + /* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */ + GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n); + + GUEST_DONE(); +} + +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL + +/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */ +static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup, + int *gic_fd) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + struct kvm_vcpu_init init; + uint8_t pmuver; + uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23; + struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = { + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ, + .addr = (uint64_t)&irq, + }; + struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = { + .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, + .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, + }; + + vm = vm_create(1); + + /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */ + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); + vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code); + *gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vm, 1, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA); + + /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */ + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0); + pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER), dfr0); + TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF && + pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_0, + "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver); + + /* Initialize vPMU */ + vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr); + vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr); + + *vcpup = vcpu; + return vm; +} + +static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n) +{ + struct ucall uc; + + vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, pmcr_n); + vcpu_run(vcpu); + switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) { + case UCALL_ABORT: + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx"); + break; + case UCALL_DONE: + break; + default: + TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd); + break; + } +} + +/* + * Create a guest with one vCPU, set the PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU to @pmcr_n, + * and run the test. + */ +static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + int gic_fd; + uint64_t sp, pmcr, pmcr_orig; + struct kvm_vcpu_init init; + + pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n); + vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd); + + /* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */ + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp); + + /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */ + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig); + pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N; + pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT); + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr); + + run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n); + + /* + * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to + * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved. + */ + vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init); + init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3); + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp); + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code); + + run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n); + + close(gic_fd); + kvm_vm_free(vm); +} + +/* + * Create a guest with one vCPU, and attempt to set the PMCR_EL0.N for + * the vCPU to @pmcr_n, which is larger than the host value. + * The attempt should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU. + */ +static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + int gic_fd, ret; + uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig; + + pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n); + vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd); + + /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */ + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig); + pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N; + pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT); + + /* This should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU */ + ret = __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr); + TEST_ASSERT(ret, "Setting PMCR to 0x%lx (orig PMCR 0x%lx) didn't fail", + pmcr, pmcr_orig); + + close(gic_fd); + kvm_vm_free(vm); +} + +/* + * Return the default number of implemented PMU event counters excluding + * the cycle counter (i.e. PMCR_EL0.N value) for the guest. + */ +static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + int gic_fd; + uint64_t pmcr; + + vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd); + vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr); + close(gic_fd); + kvm_vm_free(vm); + return FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr); +} + +int main(void) +{ + uint64_t i, pmcr_n; + + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3)); + + pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit(); + for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++) + run_test(i); + + for (i = pmcr_n + 1; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) + run_error_test(i); + + return 0; +}