Message ID | 20230423153428.3938525-1-trix@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | firmware: smccc: set variables smccc_soc_id_version,revision storage-class-specifier to static | expand |
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:34:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote: > smatch reports > drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:20:21: warning: symbol > 'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: warning: symbol > 'smccc_soc_id_revision' was not declared. Should it be static? > > These variables are only used in their defining file so should be static > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Since the patch introducing this issue comes from irqchip tree, we must either route this through that if they have earlier fixes set or wait until v6.4-rc1 and send it through SoC tree. Please cc soc@kernel.org and Marc Z and repost. It is better to be explicit and mention it is either based on -next or mention the commit introducing the issue since it make no sense if one has no knowledge of -next change.
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c index db818f9dcb8e..0cf4c45de417 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ static enum arm_smccc_conduit smccc_conduit = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE; bool __ro_after_init smccc_trng_available = false; u64 __ro_after_init smccc_has_sve_hint = false; -s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; -s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; +static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; +static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED; void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit) {
smatch reports drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:20:21: warning: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: warning: symbol 'smccc_soc_id_revision' was not declared. Should it be static? These variables are only used in their defining file so should be static Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> --- drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)