From patchwork Mon Jun 12 21:04:23 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vishal Moola X-Patchwork-Id: 13277577 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B851CA9EB0 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:08:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=qQZ2j3yjbTTdTEPdcD9PbtGLFsb+9zqquqNF5wZPcVI=; b=Sw6eEgAhWFwdy0 IV0GwXlxnhh2Qr3pr1GoxkuBz1RX9NOCb0psb67QdV8o4DhAgc5GUs9cli8SuAPNcG0Tkm6OQqtXb L/suJ7yArQaWOl1YLHYOg1fbZRvGYhe3bdakCG026BdxknSzrjsXvJFZbtyzpNhfgWg99ow4+k8/C i8vBIDN+pXeyNgf0NBweJmsERJQ2f8UPcneatBOU0q2tfusj2gZn5eLt+hErCxoU/nvH5Krd7lJS7 E3KE6HR95WdgxiVcuYWbEUgh9IPc9MsEPZsXGM4UM2DDVnikvriS5/QbXNB0wMaiE02R3rzBVib+4 DYAvNXGYUgrBgGDvN0bQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q8olV-005QDj-2H; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:07:53 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-x112d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::112d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q8ojc-005N2P-05; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:05:57 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-x112d.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-56d4f50427cso6519987b3.3; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686603955; x=1689195955; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=8ky1uDH3HAwvFTnah34UfzHSGIz5XtPXejf2e4vlCZQ=; b=mPREwt4CZ7eyjP0awRF+7J59gjRJfQYSldhgYFU3GX8JHbZALGX3vT3PNPPDkSpada kYBrPZ3fT3IHCrmgBacTa14fpMsdfLY/wfMsw3mbb6xXz9ObJPsrzVS2jkFBCphqvrnl W2C3CK1LTKvQS4G7ilQBgC608IiFiwIK0aJZOApjzUoXUMUFaYyvbn2berfE8dovgnlw G/g86Ig9l0whUW2/5Qd6SZuVXZ3fDYfyaml8bSeL/n/Mla1l5cRkRmXZyiI9FghcycAP +JJqIE8dynwBhJPRmXp4HhikHugb2xp+HYDNKHli1SWflPjzo5LK7t0+7e7QbCiwECv3 X+rQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686603955; x=1689195955; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8ky1uDH3HAwvFTnah34UfzHSGIz5XtPXejf2e4vlCZQ=; b=fRNGwBxqx0TbLvkdC1McB9QAkRcyukVC4nL5v0AP/EIJ5PRl01Ruh3Oq6whjz52Xol qQST1yaCRCvR/ZNDSbzRm0e1KiTswvYVpIZ3SvkClia/8bY16qxO0SCJNnc+KM3lv/kO w68fe6MJR9tlX02FHDQ+KpF53TPXZY1Ypk7ULaBp1LLvP0s6LgxMfSvPMfTAg9/60Bk8 qRImLVFRIz5eIJYWI9vMbHks27+EBEbn8jF0UmFpaFaGrIrbJAHCWYClyqBdvwV5vYF6 IsVHY+4s4l/sx9yuy0aZSbUooi5eXQkbyD/rxfa9OeKQGnpjGa+pAzy/yf8PmTX2FlrF SWiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwXU5V3anewhrae9fq44ARuUG1FULsVDrtZIHcHAqyHnoNFhVMl 6W0AGTNPLUhCL0iVseXPgUk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6hpYtRh2B57fGd8bPmVf+MLwfrVY1EUXTrrFmJrCanxRRmSJ+wngffzdYGMbXJAYdrr0DA1A== X-Received: by 2002:a81:9e13:0:b0:56d:4b17:7e9c with SMTP id m19-20020a819e13000000b0056d4b177e9cmr1826324ywj.32.1686603955490; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknowna0e70b2ca394.attlocal.net ([2600:1700:2f7d:1800::16]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s125-20020a817783000000b00569eb609458sm2757115ywc.81.2023.06.12.14.05.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" To: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Subject: [PATCH v4 34/34] mm: Remove pgtable_{pmd, pte}_page_{ctor, dtor}() wrappers Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:04:23 -0700 Message-Id: <20230612210423.18611-35-vishal.moola@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230612210423.18611-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20230612210423.18611-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230612_140556_109362_A1238117 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org These functions are no longer necessary. Remove them and cleanup Documentation referencing them. Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 12 +++++------ .../zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 14 ++++++------- include/linux/mm.h | 20 ------------------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 50ee0dfc95be..4bffec728340 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything -required is done by pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pte_page_dtor(), which +required is done by pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pte_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. -PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table -allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. +PMD split lock enabling requires pagetable_pmd_ctor() call on PMD table +allocation and pagetable_pmd_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. -NOTE: pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must +NOTE: pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pmd_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ trick: split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; -The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_pte_page_ctor() for PTE table and in -pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. +The spinlock_t allocated in pagetable_pte_ctor() for PTE table and in +pagetable_pmd_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 4fb7aa666037..a2c288670a24 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Hugetlb特定的辅助函数: 架构对分页表锁的支持 ==================== -没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pgtable_pte_page_ctor() -和pgtable_pte_page_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 +没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pagetable_pte_ctor() +和pagetable_pte_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 确保架构不使用slab分配器来分配页表：slab使用page->slab_cache来分配其页 面。这个区域与page->ptl共享存储。 PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 -启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()，在释放时调 -用pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()。 +启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pagetable_pmd_ctor()，在释放时调 +用pagetable_pmd_dtor()。 分配通常发生在pmd_alloc_one()中，释放发生在pmd_free()和pmd_free_tlb() 中，但要确保覆盖所有的PMD表分配/释放路径：即X86_PAE在pgd_alloc()中预先 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 一切就绪后，你可以设置CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK。 -注意：pgtable_pte_page_ctor()和pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()可能失败--必 +注意：pagetable_pte_ctor()和pagetable_pmd_ctor()可能失败--必 须正确处理。 page->ptl @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ page->ptl用于访问分割页表锁，其中'page'是包含该表的页面struc 的指针并动态分配它。这允许在启用DEBUG_SPINLOCK或DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC的 情况下使用分页锁，但由于间接访问而多花了一个缓存行。 -PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pgtable_pte_page_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t -分配在pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()中。 +PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pagetable_pte_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t +分配在pagetable_pmd_ctor()中。 请不要直接访问page->ptl - -使用适当的辅助函数。 diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index dc211c43610b..6d83483cf186 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2897,11 +2897,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pte_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2911,11 +2906,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp) \ ({ \ spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); \ @@ -3006,11 +2996,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pmd_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pmd_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -3020,11 +3005,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pmd_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - /* * No scalability reason to split PUD locks yet, but follow the same pattern * as the PMD locks to make it easier if we decide to. The VM should not be