diff mbox series

[6/7] rtc: stm32: fix unnecessary parentheses

Message ID 20230615092753.323844-7-valentin.caron@foss.st.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series rtc: stm32: multiple bug fixes and improvements | expand

Commit Message

Valentin Caron June 15, 2023, 9:27 a.m. UTC
Fix a few style issues reported by checkpatch.pl:
- Unnecessary parentheses
- Lines should not end with a '('

Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexandre Belloni June 25, 2023, 11:16 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello,

On 15/06/2023 11:27:52+0200, Valentin Caron wrote:
> Fix a few style issues reported by checkpatch.pl:
> - Unnecessary parentheses
> - Lines should not end with a '('
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> index 17e549806784..30c5004d6902 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> @@ -160,10 +160,9 @@ static int stm32_rtc_enter_init_mode(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
>  		 * slowest rtc_ck frequency may be 32kHz and highest should be
>  		 * 1MHz, we poll every 10 us with a timeout of 100ms.
>  		 */
> -		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(
> -					rtc->base + regs->isr,
> -					isr, (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
> -					10, 100000);
> +		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rtc->base + regs->isr, isr,
> +							 (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
> +							 10, 100000);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -448,16 +447,16 @@ static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
>  	 *	M-D-Y H:M:S < alarm <= (M+1)-D-Y H:M:S
>  	 * with a specific case for December...
>  	 */
> -	if ((((tm->tm_year > cur_year) &&
> -	      (tm->tm_mon == 0x1) && (cur_mon == 0x12)) ||
> -	     ((tm->tm_year == cur_year) &&
> -	      (tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1))) &&
> -	    ((tm->tm_mday > cur_day) ||
> -	     ((tm->tm_mday == cur_day) &&
> -	     ((tm->tm_hour > cur_hour) ||
> -	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min > cur_min)) ||
> -	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min == cur_min) &&
> -	       (tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec))))))
> +	if (((tm->tm_year > cur_year &&
> +	      tm->tm_mon == 0x1 && cur_mon == 0x12) ||
> +	     (tm->tm_year == cur_year &&
> +	      tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1)) &&
> +	    (tm->tm_mday > cur_day ||
> +	     (tm->tm_mday == cur_day &&
> +	     (tm->tm_hour > cur_hour ||
> +	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min > cur_min) ||
> +	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min == cur_min &&
> +	       tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec)))))

This change is dropped in the following patch. I guess you can remove
the unnecessary churn.


>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return -EINVAL;
> @@ -666,7 +665,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	 * Can't find a 1Hz, so give priority to RTC power consumption
>  	 * by choosing the higher possible value for prediv_a
>  	 */
> -	if ((pred_s > pred_s_max) || (pred_a > pred_a_max)) {
> +	if (pred_s > pred_s_max || pred_a > pred_a_max) {
>  		pred_a = pred_a_max;
>  		pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>
Valentin Caron July 5, 2023, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On 6/26/23 01:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 15/06/2023 11:27:52+0200, Valentin Caron wrote:
>> Fix a few style issues reported by checkpatch.pl:
>> - Unnecessary parentheses
>> - Lines should not end with a '('
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> index 17e549806784..30c5004d6902 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
>> @@ -160,10 +160,9 @@ static int stm32_rtc_enter_init_mode(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
>>   		 * slowest rtc_ck frequency may be 32kHz and highest should be
>>   		 * 1MHz, we poll every 10 us with a timeout of 100ms.
>>   		 */
>> -		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(
>> -					rtc->base + regs->isr,
>> -					isr, (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
>> -					10, 100000);
>> +		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rtc->base + regs->isr, isr,
>> +							 (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
>> +							 10, 100000);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> @@ -448,16 +447,16 @@ static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
>>   	 *	M-D-Y H:M:S < alarm <= (M+1)-D-Y H:M:S
>>   	 * with a specific case for December...
>>   	 */
>> -	if ((((tm->tm_year > cur_year) &&
>> -	      (tm->tm_mon == 0x1) && (cur_mon == 0x12)) ||
>> -	     ((tm->tm_year == cur_year) &&
>> -	      (tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1))) &&
>> -	    ((tm->tm_mday > cur_day) ||
>> -	     ((tm->tm_mday == cur_day) &&
>> -	     ((tm->tm_hour > cur_hour) ||
>> -	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min > cur_min)) ||
>> -	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min == cur_min) &&
>> -	       (tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec))))))
>> +	if (((tm->tm_year > cur_year &&
>> +	      tm->tm_mon == 0x1 && cur_mon == 0x12) ||
>> +	     (tm->tm_year == cur_year &&
>> +	      tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1)) &&
>> +	    (tm->tm_mday > cur_day ||
>> +	     (tm->tm_mday == cur_day &&
>> +	     (tm->tm_hour > cur_hour ||
>> +	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min > cur_min) ||
>> +	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min == cur_min &&
>> +	       tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec)))))
> This change is dropped in the following patch. I guess you can remove
> the unnecessary churn.

Yes absolutely ! Let's go for a v2.

Thanks,
Valentin

>
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -666,7 +665,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>   	 * Can't find a 1Hz, so give priority to RTC power consumption
>>   	 * by choosing the higher possible value for prediv_a
>>   	 */
>> -	if ((pred_s > pred_s_max) || (pred_a > pred_a_max)) {
>> +	if (pred_s > pred_s_max || pred_a > pred_a_max) {
>>   		pred_a = pred_a_max;
>>   		pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 17e549806784..30c5004d6902 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -160,10 +160,9 @@  static int stm32_rtc_enter_init_mode(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
 		 * slowest rtc_ck frequency may be 32kHz and highest should be
 		 * 1MHz, we poll every 10 us with a timeout of 100ms.
 		 */
-		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(
-					rtc->base + regs->isr,
-					isr, (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
-					10, 100000);
+		return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(rtc->base + regs->isr, isr,
+							 (isr & STM32_RTC_ISR_INITF),
+							 10, 100000);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -448,16 +447,16 @@  static int stm32_rtc_valid_alrm(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
 	 *	M-D-Y H:M:S < alarm <= (M+1)-D-Y H:M:S
 	 * with a specific case for December...
 	 */
-	if ((((tm->tm_year > cur_year) &&
-	      (tm->tm_mon == 0x1) && (cur_mon == 0x12)) ||
-	     ((tm->tm_year == cur_year) &&
-	      (tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1))) &&
-	    ((tm->tm_mday > cur_day) ||
-	     ((tm->tm_mday == cur_day) &&
-	     ((tm->tm_hour > cur_hour) ||
-	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min > cur_min)) ||
-	      ((tm->tm_hour == cur_hour) && (tm->tm_min == cur_min) &&
-	       (tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec))))))
+	if (((tm->tm_year > cur_year &&
+	      tm->tm_mon == 0x1 && cur_mon == 0x12) ||
+	     (tm->tm_year == cur_year &&
+	      tm->tm_mon <= cur_mon + 1)) &&
+	    (tm->tm_mday > cur_day ||
+	     (tm->tm_mday == cur_day &&
+	     (tm->tm_hour > cur_hour ||
+	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min > cur_min) ||
+	      (tm->tm_hour == cur_hour && tm->tm_min == cur_min &&
+	       tm->tm_sec >= cur_sec)))))
 		return 0;
 
 	return -EINVAL;
@@ -666,7 +665,7 @@  static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	 * Can't find a 1Hz, so give priority to RTC power consumption
 	 * by choosing the higher possible value for prediv_a
 	 */
-	if ((pred_s > pred_s_max) || (pred_a > pred_a_max)) {
+	if (pred_s > pred_s_max || pred_a > pred_a_max) {
 		pred_a = pred_a_max;
 		pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;