diff mbox series

[V2,2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE

Message ID 20230801094052.750416-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based devices | expand

Commit Message

Anshuman Khandual Aug. 1, 2023, 9:40 a.m. UTC
ACPI TRBE does not have a HID for identification which could create and add
a platform device into the platform bus. Also without a platform device, it
cannot be probed and bound to a platform driver.

This creates a dummy platform device for TRBE after ascertaining that ACPI
provides required interrupts uniformly across all cpus on the system. This
device gets created inside drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c to accommodate TRBE
being built as a module.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |  3 +++
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c   | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h  |  1 +
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Will Deacon Aug. 1, 2023, 2:51 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>  
>  #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"

Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?

Will
Anshuman Khandual Aug. 2, 2023, 1:07 a.m. UTC | #2
On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>>  
>>  #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
> 
> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?

Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming
scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with
SPE here.
Suzuki K Poulose Aug. 2, 2023, 10:11 a.m. UTC | #3
On 02/08/2023 02:07, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>>>   
>>>   #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
>>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
>>
>> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?
> 
> Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming
> scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with
> SPE here.

Do we really need v1 ? I would leave it as arm,trbe

Suzuki
Anshuman Khandual Aug. 3, 2023, 4:06 a.m. UTC | #4
On 8/2/23 15:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 02/08/2023 02:07, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>>>>     #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
>>>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
>>>
>>> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?
>>
>> Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming
>> scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with
>> SPE here.
> 
> Do we really need v1 ? I would leave it as arm,trbe

Sure, will make it 'arm,trbe' instead.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
index bd68e1b7f29f..4d537d56eb84 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ 
 #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_SPE  (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
 	spe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
 
+#define ACPI_MADT_GICC_TRBE  (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
+	trbe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
+
 /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
 #ifdef	CONFIG_ACPI
 pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr);
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index d9d5a7bbb92f..1bcda26282fc 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@  static void arm_pmu_acpi_unregister_irq(int cpu)
 		acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
 }
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE)
 static int
 arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 len,
 			     u16 (*parse_gsi)(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *))
@@ -169,6 +169,40 @@  static inline void arm_spe_acpi_register_device(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE
+static struct resource trbe_resources[] = {
+	{
+		/* irq */
+		.flags          = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
+	}
+};
+
+static struct platform_device trbe_dev = {
+	.name = ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME,
+	.id = -1,
+	.resource = trbe_resources,
+	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(trbe_resources)
+};
+
+static u16 arm_trbe_parse_gsi(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc)
+{
+	return gicc->trbe_interrupt;
+}
+
+static void arm_trbe_acpi_register_device(void)
+{
+	int ret = arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(&trbe_dev, ACPI_MADT_GICC_TRBE,
+					       arm_trbe_parse_gsi);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_warn("ACPI: TRBE: Unable to register device\n");
+}
+#else
+static inline void arm_trbe_acpi_register_device(void)
+{
+
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE */
+
 static int arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs(void)
 {
 	int irq, cpu, irq_cpu, err;
@@ -404,6 +438,7 @@  static int arm_pmu_acpi_init(void)
 		return 0;
 
 	arm_spe_acpi_register_device();
+	arm_trbe_acpi_register_device();
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -187,5 +187,6 @@  void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
 
 #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
+#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
 
 #endif /* __ARM_PMU_H__ */