From patchwork Thu Sep 14 01:55:06 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sean Christopherson X-Patchwork-Id: 13384099 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1CCEE021D for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 01:57:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID :References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=whiZKkKU14fuKrB0avSyHapzrzXla0wIijJmbfJdw/0=; b=NDlle/mUGsGk4B g8s3IgD66Y4D+Bv0eWLbnlwBs7O5nD1PrVxgMFfZOS768ExTMv6tKrKMnYxXTBUyNMQTmkbGvx/Ji mXzEYLXH1g6UOl/TozkyxPKhbqNQVs0yX1f2GurLJwWKx+Z47F7GdGnrLqzpEx//ffeyA2pZakVtA DHTKgIFcszxtwzwYJJrzEwqKsK37O+jD9cr0/yGRXQcTwE+Pn65QdHYDpqgZcVr3kDv88OSkONTnD ab4srfTUpQXWUZbh6gH7nmsq5f+ASHa+zmJ/kdnITBedc4txmr+yMWdPXrffHxrMvi7xRsMHOY2Ml PIJrHVlVgs6BZFhSQ5+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qgbbI-00745c-0G; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 01:57:00 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-f201.google.com ([209.85.128.201]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qgbaE-0072v8-1U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 01:56:00 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-f201.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-59bdb9fe821so6906337b3.0 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1694656552; x=1695261352; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c0gbqnW9KUovCg+coU7ldlYhYVFXBRbmaH2jYlXJSe8=; b=i97aUr7nQs818a/5D4PmUL5Ywbtyy/P82lUVMlhL9+yEz4wmYu3j3ErhFlFIbaK/Ma 6jHkmLNlGidLxfV2IqDGqoT3GW3qpNhcztXVOiwN7bxryQhNYaKpDmc7kHz+qrOPJNMp DriafEs5CU1xtgSXpwfY4uYPTr/beIQOqyps/GtB7a3RX2C5rbzvjo+IiNl5KrwP3TnV qsI3+kZ30Ho5rvlpMZFV6CFF6T7AxSL0CTsWA9xN7+LJith9LKaA68fi0yftRHhFIYkR gIBkbx0g7YQU8V5Q9B6/UYVv0/esCFUlFuTlht2gBOjwBAe9/DDh9nCB8rZmsOLsqy/h +ySw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694656552; x=1695261352; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=c0gbqnW9KUovCg+coU7ldlYhYVFXBRbmaH2jYlXJSe8=; b=WU31SwriQxzoMijskavSVb5Day5eeYWNxrnsqLhAJADGxPJAORYuF/WGvcTfxhMNmx Xrgpm7125tX6i5ET3Mb9gOMye4GDURY/lguf4BAYWtBYrDnv7hxt+SjTGAwN+WVfa3ZJ 2MW2rf3+pcbPXBEEZeiMGWelmKScXtH0v6/yqyZvVFY0idqSA3pc1LGTEKoFLaksS4pW EIsciFXy4PFSAZL+ub2YelznPfe2ILCQp3my6zaPGOTbwdk6XmFPoRQytUMywjquFsLZ 9EBOvNJovV7iB0H4n5fng/L+sTpS1r58UxGKCEByum323l8k8/Xo1PoY+VHUIpFyTAB+ StHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5z6p8C9WRRvEKhYs7QiY05J51uYDHZ35J7EZWqXvmfrdTXGSO 3BD6DIuiP3oGIzlMTxoq/YK9FY+/+j8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9pkaa+NfBfBN3tv0PMD61sScfAedWpdRl9BNgXYxxGW/3XiB249I/ScBV6f/2zKuHHJhj18tIK2Y= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:83d0:0:b0:d78:3c2e:b186 with SMTP id v16-20020a2583d0000000b00d783c2eb186mr79839ybm.5.1694656552108; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:55:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230914015531.1419405-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog Message-ID: <20230914015531.1419405-9-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 08/33] KVM: Add a dedicated mmu_notifier flag for reclaiming freed memory From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Huacai Chen , Michael Ellerman , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Sean Christopherson , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Andrew Morton , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Peng , Fuad Tabba , Jarkko Sakkinen , Anish Moorthy , Yu Zhang , Isaku Yamahata , Xu Yilun , Vlastimil Babka , Vishal Annapurve , Ackerley Tng , Maciej Szmigiero , David Hildenbrand , Quentin Perret , Michael Roth , Wang , Liam Merwick , Isaku Yamahata , "Kirill A . Shutemov" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230913_185554_593791_6B45E99E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Handle AMD SEV's kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed() hook by having __kvm_handle_hva_range() return whether or not an overlapping memslot was found, i.e. mmu_lock was acquired. Using the .on_unlock() hook works, but kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed() needs to run after dropping mmu_lock, which makes .on_lock() and .on_unlock() asymmetrical. Use a small struct to return the tuple of the notifier-specific return, plus whether or not overlap was found. Because the iteration helpers are __always_inlined, practically speaking, the struct will never actually be returned from a function call (not to mention the size of the struct will be two bytes in practice). Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 7c0e38752526..76d01de7838f 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -561,6 +561,19 @@ struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range { bool may_block; }; +/* + * The inner-most helper returns a tuple containing the return value from the + * arch- and action-specific handler, plus a flag indicating whether or not at + * least one memslot was found, i.e. if the handler found guest memory. + * + * Note, most notifiers are averse to booleans, so even though KVM tracks the + * return from arch code as a bool, outer helpers will cast it to an int. :-( + */ +typedef struct kvm_mmu_notifier_return { + bool ret; + bool found_memslot; +} kvm_mn_ret_t; + /* * Use a dedicated stub instead of NULL to indicate that there is no callback * function/handler. The compiler technically can't guarantee that a real @@ -582,22 +595,25 @@ static const union kvm_mmu_notifier_arg KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_NO_ARG; node; \ node = interval_tree_iter_next(node, start, last)) \ -static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, - const struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range *range) +static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, + const struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range *range) { - bool ret = false, locked = false; + struct kvm_mmu_notifier_return r = { + .ret = false, + .found_memslot = false, + }; struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range; struct kvm_memory_slot *slot; struct kvm_memslots *slots; int i, idx; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(range->end <= range->start)) - return 0; + return r; /* A null handler is allowed if and only if on_lock() is provided. */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock) && IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))) - return 0; + return r; idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); @@ -631,8 +647,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_range.end = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1, slot); gfn_range.slot = slot; - if (!locked) { - locked = true; + if (!r.found_memslot) { + r.found_memslot = true; KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm); if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock)) range->on_lock(kvm); @@ -640,14 +656,14 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler)) break; } - ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range); + r.ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range); } } - if (range->flush_on_ret && ret) + if (range->flush_on_ret && r.ret) kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); - if (locked) { + if (r.found_memslot) { KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm); if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_unlock)) range->on_unlock(kvm); @@ -655,8 +671,7 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); - /* The notifiers are averse to booleans. :-( */ - return (int)ret; + return r; } static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn, @@ -677,7 +692,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn, .may_block = false, }; - return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range); + return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range).ret; } static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn, @@ -696,7 +711,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn .may_block = false, }; - return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range); + return __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range).ret; } static bool kvm_change_spte_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range) @@ -796,7 +811,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, .end = range->end, .handler = kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range, .on_lock = kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin, - .on_unlock = kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed, + .on_unlock = (void *)kvm_null_fn, .flush_on_ret = true, .may_block = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range), }; @@ -828,7 +843,13 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, gfn_to_pfn_cache_invalidate_start(kvm, range->start, range->end, hva_range.may_block); - __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &hva_range); + /* + * If one or more memslots were found and thus zapped, notify arch code + * that guest memory has been reclaimed. This needs to be done *after* + * dropping mmu_lock, as x86's reclaim path is slooooow. + */ + if (__kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &hva_range).found_memslot) + kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed(kvm); return 0; }