Message ID | 20231005095025.1872048-27-mark.rutland@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B6EE8FDC3 for <linux-arm-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 09:52:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uMhjx7QKAmcKrWXE0Z5MPDRZpSK3mP2r7a7iOxEXkoU=; b=cJ0qdetf/YdwR3 ODwg+KuNfteSu9DJQkxvrUPQcZ1/JmPJ5FyqPdKgbvKluIrg3FkCk5mqL74qg6Z9FwF7fKUvxH1vE YnNY5eLkyhW49MTURF79wpWHB9m4Z+87mwp887C/YJTcLvDOhBhnw4v0QIlIqAKX4HAdqKplXOjaq CNvZmJIOBrZD/IfRRUk0f1qUxC7KZr14C7jOHxjo599J59ZVFaXFwRkVt3QJKqkrU+KvAE69bqqOe JUl25MSpO2/chDdydfL8jdc/COEwQ0k3moC8bLjtIAV6FYWpAsMskM45inPikTUGjNBJ49rxxSxd2 SHWpbHMkH7kHyeh/Q4nA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qoL1j-001oT8-0a; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:52:15 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qoL1Y-001oJV-1T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:52:09 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0660A1576; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 22FE33F5A1; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:52:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: ardb@kernel.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com, jgross@suse.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, pcc@google.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 25/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 10:50:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20231005095025.1872048-27-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20231005095025.1872048-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20231005095025.1872048-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231005_025204_566189_51330129 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
arm64: Remove cpus_have_const_cap()
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index c581687b23a2e..bceb007f9ea3a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static inline bool system_supports_bti_kernel(void) static inline bool system_supports_tlb_range(void) { - return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE); + return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE); } int do_emulate_mrs(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 sys_reg, u32 rt);
We use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. In the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE cpucap and patching alternative branches, we do not perform any TLB invalidation, and even if we were to perform TLB invalidation here it would not be functionally necessary to optimize this by using range invalidation. Hence there's no need to use cpus_have_const_cap(), and alternative_has_cap_unlikely() is sufficient. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)