diff mbox series

[3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation

Message ID 20231103215124.1095-4-quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs | expand

Commit Message

Bibek Kumar Patro Nov. 3, 2023, 9:51 p.m. UTC
Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.

Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.17.1

Comments

Dmitry Baryshkov Nov. 3, 2023, 9:58 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>         return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
>  }
>
> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
> +
> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       u32 reg;
> +
> +       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> +               for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
> +                       reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> +                       reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
> +                       arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> +               }

Wrong indentation. Did you run your patches through checkpatch.pl?

> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>         int ret;
>
> -       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +       qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
>
>         /*
>          * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
> @@ -488,7 +506,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
>         .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>         .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>         .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>         .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>         .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>  };
> @@ -507,7 +525,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
>         .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>         .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>         .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>         .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>         .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>  };
> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
>         .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
>         .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>         .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
>         .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
>         .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Bibek Kumar Patro Nov. 3, 2023, 10:06 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/4/2023 3:28 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
>> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
>> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
>> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>>          return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
>> +
>> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> +{
>> +       int i;
>> +       u32 reg;
>> +
>> +       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
>> +
>> +               for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
>> +                       reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>> +                       reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
>> +                       arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>> +               }
> 
> Wrong indentation. Did you run your patches through checkpatch.pl?
> 

Yes Dmitry, I did run checkpatch.pl script on this patch as well as 
others, got 0 errors and 0 warnings. With -f option as well. Did not
get any related errors and warnings.

>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>   {
>>          int ret;
>>
>> -       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
>> +       qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
>>
>>          /*
>>           * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
>> @@ -488,7 +506,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
>>          .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>>          .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>          .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>   };
>> @@ -507,7 +525,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
>>          .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>>          .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>          .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>   };
>> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>>   static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
>>          .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
>>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>          .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
>>          .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
>>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 
>
Dmitry Baryshkov Nov. 3, 2023, 10:23 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 00:07, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/4/2023 3:28 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
> > <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
> >> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
> >> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
> >> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
> >>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
> >>          return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
> >> +
> >> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >> +{
> >> +       int i;
> >> +       u32 reg;
> >> +
> >> +       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> >> +
> >> +               for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
> >> +                       reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> >> +                       reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
> >> +                       arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> >> +               }
> >
> > Wrong indentation. Did you run your patches through checkpatch.pl?
> >
>
> Yes Dmitry, I did run checkpatch.pl script on this patch as well as
> others, got 0 errors and 0 warnings. With -f option as well. Did not
> get any related errors and warnings.

Ack, I beg your pardon. checkpatch indeed doesn't warn about this
indentation. Though it is still incorrect.

>
> >> +
> >> +       return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >>   {
> >>          int ret;
> >>
> >> -       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> >> +       qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
> >>
> >>          /*
> >>           * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
> >> @@ -488,7 +506,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
> >>          .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> >>          .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> >>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> >> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> >> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> >>          .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> >>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> >>   };
> >> @@ -507,7 +525,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
> >>          .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> >>          .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> >>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> >> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> >> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> >>          .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> >>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> >>   };
> >> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
> >>   static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
> >>          .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
> >>          .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> >> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> >> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
> >>          .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
> >>          .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
> >>          .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> >
Bibek Kumar Patro Nov. 3, 2023, 10:42 p.m. UTC | #4
On 11/4/2023 3:53 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 00:07, Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/4/2023 3:28 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
>>> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
>>>> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
>>>> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
>>>> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>>>>           return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
>>>> +
>>>> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       int i;
>>>> +       u32 reg;
>>>> +
>>>> +       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
>>>> +
>>>> +               for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
>>>> +                       reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>>>> +                       reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
>>>> +                       arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>>>> +               }
>>>
>>> Wrong indentation. Did you run your patches through checkpatch.pl?
>>>
>>
>> Yes Dmitry, I did run checkpatch.pl script on this patch as well as
>> others, got 0 errors and 0 warnings. With -f option as well. Did not
>> get any related errors and warnings.
> 
> Ack, I beg your pardon. checkpatch indeed doesn't warn about this
> indentation. Though it is still incorrect.
> 

Ack, thanks for pointing this out. Will fix this indentation for loop in
next iteration.

>>
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>>    {
>>>>           int ret;
>>>>
>>>> -       arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
>>>> +       qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
>>>>
>>>>           /*
>>>>            * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
>>>> @@ -488,7 +506,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
>>>>           .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>>>>           .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>>>>           .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>>>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>>>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>>>           .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>>>>           .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>>>    };
>>>> @@ -507,7 +525,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
>>>>           .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
>>>>           .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
>>>>           .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>>>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>>>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>>>           .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
>>>>           .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>>>    };
>>>> @@ -523,7 +541,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>>>>    static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
>>>>           .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
>>>>           .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>>>> -       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
>>>> +       .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>>>>           .alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
>>>>           .write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
>>>>           .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
>
Konrad Dybcio Nov. 4, 2023, 11:30 a.m. UTC | #5
On 11/3/23 22:51, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
>   	return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
>   }
> 
> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
> +
> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
This loop deserves a comment above it like

/* Re-enable context caching after reset */

Konrad
Bibek Kumar Patro Nov. 6, 2023, 6:28 a.m. UTC | #6
On 11/4/2023 5:00 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/3/23 22:51, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
>> Context caching is re-enabled in the prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs
>> through SoC specific reset ops, which is disabled in the default MMU-500
>> reset ops, but is expected for context banks using ACTLR register to
>> retain the prefetch value during reset and runtime suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c 
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -457,11 +457,29 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct 
>> device *dev)
>>       return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
>> +
>> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +    u32 reg;
>> +
>> +    arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
>> +
>> +        for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
> This loop deserves a comment above it like
> 
> /* Re-enable context caching after reset */
> 

Ack, thanks for this suggestion, this might help to explain
this addition.
I would incorporate this in next patch.

regards,
Bibek

> Konrad
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 590b7c285299..f342b4778cf1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -457,11 +457,29 @@  static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
 	return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
 }

+#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE          BIT(1)
+
+static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+	int i;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
+			reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
+			reg |= ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE;
+			arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
+		}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
 	int ret;

-	arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+	qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);

 	/*
 	 * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
@@ -488,7 +506,7 @@  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
 	.init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
 	.cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
 	.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
-	.reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+	.reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
 	.write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
 	.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
 };
@@ -507,7 +525,7 @@  static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
 	.init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
 	.cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
 	.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
-	.reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+	.reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
 	.write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
 	.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
 };
@@ -523,7 +541,7 @@  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
 static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
 	.init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
 	.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
-	.reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+	.reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
 	.alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
 	.write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
 	.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,