From patchwork Sun Feb 4 07:45:22 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yicong Yang X-Patchwork-Id: 13544532 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4168FC48295 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 07:50:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=p+G9t2dRnZtkAnHId1eVXxPOr3qRQYnqkT/tYYFRhuk=; b=QL8Q55iROsEJ8E lHMQuwhXVdi4x3qd5CEt0nKqGHMm4UXLfkLNqyvN1pgPu6BW+4gRkTolGdz+nCZpjOU7kaxDxkBWl JDrcJ6P6EkAJiTRiP4qvT3sDm+bOGR8IbbagFWoI5UFBINHL0YRy/vKUFvsCDWEOtwYnxabBTWBqF 7zDEEKy/xLVLWCu1GbuVdtFsmuDJfzOJ5sQV/rUeuhd6sM5B0trsjqeHNfAGkIbh5dOIXog+Li8hW 25mLLpUb7X2NaZZelRTOUILmBWlCsJTihkhwTWJ7v3umGgMI7Xt3S8Cb4blIWMS9wRoEf3GmdVmlb OT7EOAjvYc2Slx5wXvaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rWXGH-00000000M8X-4AuH; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 07:49:57 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rWXG8-00000000M1r-0JZs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2024 07:49:51 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TSM8h3fjfz1vt7q; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:49:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.192.105.203]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A44A1404D8; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:49:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.50.165.33) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:49:35 +0800 From: Yicong Yang To: , , , , , CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/perf: hisi_pcie: Fix incorrect counting under metric mode Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:45:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20240204074527.47110-3-yangyicong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.0 In-Reply-To: <20240204074527.47110-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> References: <20240204074527.47110-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.50.165.33] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240203_234948_575723_DAEB8D4A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Yicong Yang The metric counting shows incorrect results if the events in the metric group using the same event but different filter options. This is because we only judge the event code to decide whether the event in the metric group should share the same hardware counter, but ignore the settings of the filter. For example, on a platform of 2 ports 0x1 and 0x2 but only port 0x1 has a downstream PCIe NVME device. The metric counting shows both ports have the same counts because we misassign these two events to one same hardware counter: [root@localhost perf-iostat]# ./perf stat -e '{hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/,hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/}' Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 7907484924 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/ 7907484924 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/ 10.153863691 seconds time elapsed Fix this by using the whole config rather than the event only to judge whether two events are the same and should share the same hardware counter. With this patch, the metric counting in the above case tends to be corrected: [root@localhost perf-iostat]# ./perf stat -e '{hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/,hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/}' Performance counter stats for 'system wide': 0 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x2/ 8123122077 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x0104,port=0x1/ 10.152875631 seconds time elapsed Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU") Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang --- drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c index 11a819cd07f2..9623bed93876 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c @@ -314,10 +314,15 @@ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_valid_filter(struct perf_event *event, return true; } +/* + * Check Whether two events share the same config. The same config means not + * only the event code, but also the filter settings of the two events are + * the same. + */ static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_cmp_event(struct perf_event *target, struct perf_event *event) { - return hisi_pcie_get_real_event(target) == hisi_pcie_get_real_event(event); + return hisi_pcie_pmu_get_filter(target) == hisi_pcie_pmu_get_filter(event); } static bool hisi_pcie_pmu_validate_event_group(struct perf_event *event)