| Message ID | 20240229-gce-client-reg-add-missing-mt8192-95-v1-2-b12c233a8a33@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: dts: mediatek: Add missing gce-client-reg properties to mt8192 and mt8195 | expand |
Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and > vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't > parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should > result in better performance. > > Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes") > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only generates commit noise for no practical reason imo. arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex Thanks, Angelo > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi > index ea6dc220e1cc..f2912e1a0e49 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi > @@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ vppsys0: syscon@14000000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0", "syscon"; > reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>; > #clock-cells = <1>; > + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0 0x1000>; > }; > > dma-controller@14001000 { > @@ -2251,6 +2252,7 @@ vppsys1: syscon@14f00000 { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1", "syscon"; > reg = <0 0x14f00000 0 0x1000>; > #clock-cells = <1>; > + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_14f0XXXX 0 0x1000>; > }; > > mutex@14f01000 { > @@ -3080,6 +3082,7 @@ vdosys0: syscon@1c01a000 { > reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>; > mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>; > #clock-cells = <1>; > + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>; > }; > > >
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > > Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and > > vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't > > parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should > > result in better performance. > > > > Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes") > > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > > Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one? > > It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only > generates commit noise for no practical reason imo. > > arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2 and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1. Let me know how you want to proceed. Thanks, Nícolas
Il 01/03/24 15:39, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: >>> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and >>> vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't >>> parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should >>> result in better performance. >>> >>> Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes") >>> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> >> >> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one? >> >> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only >> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo. >> >> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex > > I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily > backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2 > and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily > backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we > squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1. > > Let me know how you want to proceed. > Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice that. Ignore my previous comment then, I'll take those for the next fixes round as-is. Cheers, Angelo
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi index ea6dc220e1cc..f2912e1a0e49 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi @@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ vppsys0: syscon@14000000 { compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0", "syscon"; reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>; #clock-cells = <1>; + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0 0x1000>; }; dma-controller@14001000 { @@ -2251,6 +2252,7 @@ vppsys1: syscon@14f00000 { compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1", "syscon"; reg = <0 0x14f00000 0 0x1000>; #clock-cells = <1>; + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_14f0XXXX 0 0x1000>; }; mutex@14f01000 { @@ -3080,6 +3082,7 @@ vdosys0: syscon@1c01a000 { reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>; mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>; #clock-cells = <1>; + mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>; };
Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should result in better performance. Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes") Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)