| Message ID | 20240325075635.1382911-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: dts: stm32: move can3 node from stm32f746 to stm32f769 | expand |
Hi Dario On 3/25/24 08:56, Dario Binacchi wrote: > According to documents [1], [2] and [3], we have 2 CAN devices on the > stm32f746 platform and 3 on the stm32f769 platform. So let's move the > can3 node from stm32f746.dtsi to stm32f769.dtsi. > > [1] https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f7-series.html > [2] RM0385: STM32F75xxx and STM32F74xxx advanced Arm®-based 32-bit MCUs > [3] RM0410: STM32F76xxx and STM32F77xxx advanced Arm®-based 32-bit MCUs > Fixes: df362914eead ("ARM: dts: stm32: re-add CAN support on stm32f746") > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> > > --- > > Applied on stm32-next. Cheers Alex
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi index 65c72b6fcc83..2537b3d47e6f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi @@ -257,23 +257,6 @@ rtc: rtc@40002800 { status = "disabled"; }; - can3: can@40003400 { - compatible = "st,stm32f4-bxcan"; - reg = <0x40003400 0x200>; - interrupts = <104>, <105>, <106>, <107>; - interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce"; - resets = <&rcc STM32F7_APB1_RESET(CAN3)>; - clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F7_APB1_CLOCK(CAN3)>; - st,gcan = <&gcan3>; - status = "disabled"; - }; - - gcan3: gcan@40003600 { - compatible = "st,stm32f4-gcan", "syscon"; - reg = <0x40003600 0x200>; - clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F7_APB1_CLOCK(CAN3)>; - }; - spi2: spi@40003800 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769.dtsi index 4e7d9032149c..e8cbb99e81a6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769.dtsi @@ -7,6 +7,23 @@ / { soc { + can3: can@40003400 { + compatible = "st,stm32f4-bxcan"; + reg = <0x40003400 0x200>; + interrupts = <104>, <105>, <106>, <107>; + interrupt-names = "tx", "rx0", "rx1", "sce"; + resets = <&rcc STM32F7_APB1_RESET(CAN3)>; + clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F7_APB1_CLOCK(CAN3)>; + st,gcan = <&gcan3>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + gcan3: gcan@40003600 { + compatible = "st,stm32f4-gcan", "syscon"; + reg = <0x40003600 0x200>; + clocks = <&rcc 0 STM32F7_APB1_CLOCK(CAN3)>; + }; + dsi: dsi@40016c00 { compatible = "st,stm32-dsi"; reg = <0x40016c00 0x800>;
According to documents [1], [2] and [3], we have 2 CAN devices on the stm32f746 platform and 3 on the stm32f769 platform. So let's move the can3 node from stm32f746.dtsi to stm32f769.dtsi. [1] https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f7-series.html [2] RM0385: STM32F75xxx and STM32F74xxx advanced Arm®-based 32-bit MCUs [3] RM0410: STM32F76xxx and STM32F77xxx advanced Arm®-based 32-bit MCUs Fixes: df362914eead ("ARM: dts: stm32: re-add CAN support on stm32f746") Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi | 17 ----------------- arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)