Message ID | 20240415-rzn1-gmac1-v3-2-ab12f2c4401d@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | net: stmmac: Add support for RZN1 GMAC devices | expand |
Hi Romain, Russell On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:18:42AM +0200, Romain Gantois wrote: > From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > > Introduce a mechanism whereby platforms can create their PCS instances > prior to the network device being published to userspace, but after > some of the core stmmac initialisation has been completed. This means > that the data structures that platforms need will be available. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> > Signed-off-by: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@bootlin.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > include/linux/stmmac.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > index fe3498e86de9d..25fa33ae7017b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > @@ -7208,6 +7208,12 @@ static int stmmac_hw_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (priv->plat->pcs_init) { > + ret = priv->plat->pcs_init(priv, priv->hw); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + I am currently working on my Memory-mapped DW XPCS patchset cooking: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205103559.9605-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/ The changes in this series seems to intersect to what is/will be introduced in my patchset. In particular as before I am going to use the "pcs-handle" property for getting the XPCS node. If so what about collecting PCS-related things in a single place. Like this: int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct net_device *ndev) { ... if (priv->plat->pcs_init) { return priv->plat->pcs_init(priv); /* Romain' part */ } else if (fwnode_property_present(priv->plat->port_node, "pcs-handle")) { /* My DW XPCS part */ } else if (priv->plat->mdio_bus_data && priv->plat->mdio_bus_data->has_xpcs) { /* Currently implemented procedure */ } ... } void stmmac_xpcs_clean(struct net_device *ndev) { ... if (priv->plat->pcs_exit) { priv->plat->pcs_exit(priv); return; } xpcs_destroy(priv->hw->xpcs); priv->hw->xpcs = NULL; } Please see the last two patches in my series: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205103559.9605-16-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205103559.9605-17-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/ as a reference of how the changes could be provided. -Serge(y) > /* Get the HW capability (new GMAC newer than 3.50a) */ > priv->hw_cap_support = stmmac_get_hw_features(priv); > if (priv->hw_cap_support) { > @@ -7290,6 +7296,12 @@ static int stmmac_hw_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv) > return 0; > } > > +static void stmmac_hw_exit(struct stmmac_priv *priv) > +{ > + if (priv->plat->pcs_exit) > + priv->plat->pcs_exit(priv, priv->hw); > +} > + > static void stmmac_napi_add(struct net_device *dev) > { > struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); > @@ -7804,6 +7816,7 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device, > priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_RTBI) > stmmac_mdio_unregister(ndev); > error_mdio_register: > + stmmac_hw_exit(priv); > stmmac_napi_del(ndev); > error_hw_init: > destroy_workqueue(priv->wq); > @@ -7844,6 +7857,7 @@ void stmmac_dvr_remove(struct device *dev) > if (priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_TBI && > priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_RTBI) > stmmac_mdio_unregister(ndev); > + stmmac_hw_exit(priv); > destroy_workqueue(priv->wq); > mutex_destroy(&priv->lock); > bitmap_free(priv->af_xdp_zc_qps); > diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h > index dfa1828cd756a..941fde506e514 100644 > --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h > +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h > @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data { > int (*crosststamp)(ktime_t *device, struct system_counterval_t *system, > void *ctx); > void (*dump_debug_regs)(void *priv); > + int (*pcs_init)(struct stmmac_priv *priv, struct mac_device_info *hw); > + void (*pcs_exit)(struct stmmac_priv *priv, struct mac_device_info *hw); > void *bsp_priv; > struct clk *stmmac_clk; > struct clk *pclk; > > -- > 2.44.0 > >
Hi Serge, On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Serge Semin wrote: > I am currently working on my Memory-mapped DW XPCS patchset cooking: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205103559.9605-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/ > The changes in this series seems to intersect to what is/will be > introduced in my patchset. In particular as before I am going to > use the "pcs-handle" property for getting the XPCS node. If so what > about collecting PCS-related things in a single place. Like this: > > int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct net_device *ndev) > { > ... > > if (priv->plat->pcs_init) { > return priv->plat->pcs_init(priv); /* Romain' part */ > } else if (fwnode_property_present(priv->plat->port_node, "pcs-handle")) { > /* My DW XPCS part */ > } else if (priv->plat->mdio_bus_data && priv->plat->mdio_bus_data->has_xpcs) { > /* Currently implemented procedure */ > } > > ... > } That seems like a good idea to me, although those setup functions would have to be renamed to stmmac_pcs_setup/exit. Thanks,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:30:09AM +0200, Romain Gantois wrote: > Hi Serge, > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Serge Semin wrote: > > > I am currently working on my Memory-mapped DW XPCS patchset cooking: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231205103559.9605-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com/ > > The changes in this series seems to intersect to what is/will be > > introduced in my patchset. In particular as before I am going to > > use the "pcs-handle" property for getting the XPCS node. If so what > > about collecting PCS-related things in a single place. Like this: > > > > int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct net_device *ndev) > > { > > ... > > > > if (priv->plat->pcs_init) { > > return priv->plat->pcs_init(priv); /* Romain' part */ > > } else if (fwnode_property_present(priv->plat->port_node, "pcs-handle")) { > > /* My DW XPCS part */ > > } else if (priv->plat->mdio_bus_data && priv->plat->mdio_bus_data->has_xpcs) { > > /* Currently implemented procedure */ > > } > > > > ... > > } > > That seems like a good idea to me, although those setup functions would have to > be renamed to stmmac_pcs_setup/exit. Why not, seeing they will be responsible for any PCS attached to the MAC. -Serge(y) > > Thanks, > > -- > Romain Gantois, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c index fe3498e86de9d..25fa33ae7017b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c @@ -7208,6 +7208,12 @@ static int stmmac_hw_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv) if (ret) return ret; + if (priv->plat->pcs_init) { + ret = priv->plat->pcs_init(priv, priv->hw); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + /* Get the HW capability (new GMAC newer than 3.50a) */ priv->hw_cap_support = stmmac_get_hw_features(priv); if (priv->hw_cap_support) { @@ -7290,6 +7296,12 @@ static int stmmac_hw_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv) return 0; } +static void stmmac_hw_exit(struct stmmac_priv *priv) +{ + if (priv->plat->pcs_exit) + priv->plat->pcs_exit(priv, priv->hw); +} + static void stmmac_napi_add(struct net_device *dev) { struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); @@ -7804,6 +7816,7 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device, priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_RTBI) stmmac_mdio_unregister(ndev); error_mdio_register: + stmmac_hw_exit(priv); stmmac_napi_del(ndev); error_hw_init: destroy_workqueue(priv->wq); @@ -7844,6 +7857,7 @@ void stmmac_dvr_remove(struct device *dev) if (priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_TBI && priv->hw->pcs != STMMAC_PCS_RTBI) stmmac_mdio_unregister(ndev); + stmmac_hw_exit(priv); destroy_workqueue(priv->wq); mutex_destroy(&priv->lock); bitmap_free(priv->af_xdp_zc_qps); diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h index dfa1828cd756a..941fde506e514 100644 --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data { int (*crosststamp)(ktime_t *device, struct system_counterval_t *system, void *ctx); void (*dump_debug_regs)(void *priv); + int (*pcs_init)(struct stmmac_priv *priv, struct mac_device_info *hw); + void (*pcs_exit)(struct stmmac_priv *priv, struct mac_device_info *hw); void *bsp_priv; struct clk *stmmac_clk; struct clk *pclk;