| Message ID | 20240515121634.23945-2-dmt.yashin@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308b SoC support | expand |
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to > the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. > > Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix something I can just apply? Yours, Linus Walleij
Am Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024, 14:16:32 CEST schrieb Dmitry Yashin: > Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to > the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. > > Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 17 ++--------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c > index 3bedf36a0019..cc647db76927 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c > @@ -870,9 +870,8 @@ static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3308_mux_route_data[] = { > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PC3, 1, 0x314, BIT(16 + 0) | BIT(0)), /* rtc_clk */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(16 + 3)), /* uart2_rxm0 */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(4, RK_PD2, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(16 + 3) | BIT(2)), /* uart2_rxm1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB7, 2, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9)), /* i2c3_sdam0 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 2, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(8)), /* i2c3_sdam1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA0, 3, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(9)), /* i2c3_sdam2 */ > + RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB7, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 4)), /* i2c3_sdam0 */ > + RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 4) | BIT(4)), /* i2c3_sdam1 */ checked against TRM and no devicetree in the kernel currently enables i2c3 at all. > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PA3, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclktxm0 */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PA4, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclkrxm0 */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PB5, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3) | BIT(3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclktxm1 */ > @@ -881,18 +880,6 @@ static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3308_mux_route_data[] = { > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PB6, 4, 0x308, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(12)), /* pdm-clkm1 */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA6, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(13)), /* pdm-clkm2 */ > RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA4, 3, 0x600, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(2)), /* pdm-clkm-m2 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB2, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 9)), /* spi1_miso */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA4, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(9)), /* spi1_miso_m1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB3, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11)), /* owire_m0 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 7, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11) | BIT(10)), /* owire_m1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA2, 5, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11) | BIT(11)), /* owire_m2 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB3, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13)), /* can_rxd_m0 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 5, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(12)), /* can_rxd_m1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA2, 4, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(13)), /* can_rxd_m2 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC4, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 14)), /* mac_rxd0_m0 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(4, RK_PA2, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 14) | BIT(14)), /* mac_rxd0_m1 */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 4, 0x314, BIT(16 + 15)), /* uart3_rx */ > - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PC1, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 15) | BIT(15)), /* uart3_rx_m1 */ checked against the TRM too. And as far as usage: - spi1: not used at all - owire: not used at all - can: not used at all - mac_rxd0: all boards use the (default) m0 variant - uart3: not currently enabled anywhere And I guess the rk3308 is niche enough that people either use the vendor-kernel or have the dts in mainline, so we should have a ok grasp on not causing breakage by some accidental rk3308b somewhere. Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Hi Linus, Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 13:29:12 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to > > the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. > > > > Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> > > While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix > something I can just apply? I'd think so. I've detailed stuff in my Review mail I just sent. Both the soc itself and also the affected pin functions are niche enough that this should not cause breakage. Heiko
Hi Heiko, On 5/28/24 4:52 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 13:29:12 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to >>> the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. >>> >>> Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> >> While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix >> something I can just apply? > I'd think so. I've detailed stuff in my Review mail I just sent. > Both the soc itself and also the affected pin functions are niche > enough that this should not cause breakage. > > > Heiko > > > Should i just drop 1/3 from V2 then? Thanks everyone for the feedback on this series. I'll prepare V2 based on runtime chip detection with use of GRF_CHIP_ID.
Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Dmitry Yashin: > Hi Heiko, > > On 5/28/24 4:52 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > > > Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024, 13:29:12 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to > >>> the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") > >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> > >> While you guys are thinking about the RK3308B support, is this fix > >> something I can just apply? > > I'd think so. I've detailed stuff in my Review mail I just sent. > > Both the soc itself and also the affected pin functions are niche > > enough that this should not cause breakage. > > > > > > Heiko > > > > > > > > Should i just drop 1/3 from V2 then? I guess just check the state of affairs once your v2 is ready ;-) . I.e. if LinusW grabs patch1 before you post v2, just drop it, otherwise send it along. > Thanks everyone for the feedback on this series. I'll prepare V2 based > on runtime chip detection with use of GRF_CHIP_ID.
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to > the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. > > Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> This patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c index 3bedf36a0019..cc647db76927 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c @@ -870,9 +870,8 @@ static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3308_mux_route_data[] = { RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PC3, 1, 0x314, BIT(16 + 0) | BIT(0)), /* rtc_clk */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(16 + 3)), /* uart2_rxm0 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(4, RK_PD2, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(16 + 3) | BIT(2)), /* uart2_rxm1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB7, 2, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9)), /* i2c3_sdam0 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 2, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(8)), /* i2c3_sdam1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA0, 3, 0x608, BIT(16 + 8) | BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(9)), /* i2c3_sdam2 */ + RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB7, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 4)), /* i2c3_sdam0 */ + RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 4) | BIT(4)), /* i2c3_sdam1 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PA3, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclktxm0 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PA4, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclkrxm0 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PB5, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 3) | BIT(3)), /* i2s-8ch-1-sclktxm1 */ @@ -881,18 +880,6 @@ static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3308_mux_route_data[] = { RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PB6, 4, 0x308, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(12)), /* pdm-clkm1 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA6, 2, 0x308, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(13)), /* pdm-clkm2 */ RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA4, 3, 0x600, BIT(16 + 2) | BIT(2)), /* pdm-clkm-m2 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB2, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 9)), /* spi1_miso */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA4, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 9) | BIT(9)), /* spi1_miso_m1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB3, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11)), /* owire_m0 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 7, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11) | BIT(10)), /* owire_m1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA2, 5, 0x314, BIT(16 + 10) | BIT(16 + 11) | BIT(11)), /* owire_m2 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PB3, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13)), /* can_rxd_m0 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC6, 5, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(12)), /* can_rxd_m1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(2, RK_PA2, 4, 0x314, BIT(16 + 12) | BIT(16 + 13) | BIT(13)), /* can_rxd_m2 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(1, RK_PC4, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 14)), /* mac_rxd0_m0 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(4, RK_PA2, 2, 0x314, BIT(16 + 14) | BIT(14)), /* mac_rxd0_m1 */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(3, RK_PB4, 4, 0x314, BIT(16 + 15)), /* uart3_rx */ - RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(0, RK_PC1, 3, 0x314, BIT(16 + 15) | BIT(15)), /* uart3_rx_m1 */ }; static struct rockchip_mux_route_data rk3328_mux_route_data[] = {
Some of the rk3308 iomux routes in rk3308_mux_route_data belong to the rk3308b SoC. Remove them and correct i2c3 routes. Fixes: 7825aeb7b208 ("pinctrl: rockchip: add rk3308 SoC support") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yashin <dmt.yashin@gmail.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 17 ++--------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)