| Message ID | 20240520145402.2526481-6-sean.anderson@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PCI: xilinx-nwl: Add phy support | expand |
> Make sure we turn off the clock on probe failure and device removal. … > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c … > @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie); > if (err < 0) { > dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err); > - return err; > + goto err_clk; > } > } > > - return pci_host_probe(bridge); > + err = pci_host_probe(bridge); > + > +err_clk: > + if (err) > + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); I suggest to use the label “disable_unprepare_clock” directly before this function call (in the if branch) so that a duplicate check would be avoided after some error cases. Regards, Markus
On 5/23/24 15:18, Markus Elfring wrote: >> Make sure we turn off the clock on probe failure and device removal. > … >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c > … >> @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie); >> if (err < 0) { >> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err); >> - return err; >> + goto err_clk; >> } >> } >> >> - return pci_host_probe(bridge); >> + err = pci_host_probe(bridge); >> + >> +err_clk: >> + if (err) >> + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); > > I suggest to use the label “disable_unprepare_clock” directly before this function call > (in the if branch) so that a duplicate check would be avoided after some error cases. Well if you want to avoid a check, we can just do err = pci_host_probe(bridge); if (!err) return 0; err_clk: ... --Sean
>> … >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c >> … >>> @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie); >>> if (err < 0) { >>> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err); >>> - return err; >>> + goto err_clk; >>> } >>> } >>> >>> - return pci_host_probe(bridge); >>> + err = pci_host_probe(bridge); >>> + >>> +err_clk: >>> + if (err) >>> + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); >> >> I suggest to use the label “disable_unprepare_clock” directly before this function call >> (in the if branch) so that a duplicate check would be avoided after some error cases. > > Well if you want to avoid a check, we can just do > > err = pci_host_probe(bridge); > if (!err) > return 0; > > err_clk: > ... This design variant can also be reasonable. Do any preferences matter here for label name selections? Regards, Markus
On 5/23/24 16:11, Markus Elfring wrote: >>> … >>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c >>> … >>>> @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie); >>>> if (err < 0) { >>>> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err); >>>> - return err; >>>> + goto err_clk; >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> - return pci_host_probe(bridge); >>>> + err = pci_host_probe(bridge); >>>> + >>>> +err_clk: >>>> + if (err) >>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); >>> >>> I suggest to use the label “disable_unprepare_clock” directly before this function call >>> (in the if branch) so that a duplicate check would be avoided after some error cases. >> >> Well if you want to avoid a check, we can just do >> >> err = pci_host_probe(bridge); >> if (!err) >> return 0; >> >> err_clk: >> ... > > This design variant can also be reasonable. > > Do any preferences matter here for label name selections? Personally, I prefer to use labels named after what they're cleaning up and not what they're doing. --Sean
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c index c0a60cebdb2e..424cc5a1b4d1 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c @@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENODEV; pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge); + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie); pcie->dev = dev; @@ -801,13 +802,13 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) err = nwl_pcie_bridge_init(pcie); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "HW Initialization failed\n"); - return err; + goto err_clk; } err = nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain(pcie); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "Failed creating IRQ Domain\n"); - return err; + goto err_clk; } bridge->sysdata = pcie; @@ -817,11 +818,23 @@ static int nwl_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) err = nwl_pcie_enable_msi(pcie); if (err < 0) { dev_err(dev, "failed to enable MSI support: %d\n", err); - return err; + goto err_clk; } } - return pci_host_probe(bridge); + err = pci_host_probe(bridge); + +err_clk: + if (err) + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); + return err; +} + +static void nwl_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct nwl_pcie *pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk); } static struct platform_driver nwl_pcie_driver = { @@ -831,5 +844,6 @@ static struct platform_driver nwl_pcie_driver = { .of_match_table = nwl_pcie_of_match, }, .probe = nwl_pcie_probe, + .remove_new = nwl_pcie_remove, }; builtin_platform_driver(nwl_pcie_driver);
Make sure we turn off the clock on probe failure and device removal. Fixes: de0a01f52966 ("PCI: xilinx-nwl: Enable the clock through CCF") Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> --- (no changes since v1) drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)