diff mbox series

[v1,1/2] KVM: arm64: Allow BT field in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable

Message ID 20240617075131.1006173-2-shahuang@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: arm64: Making BT Field in ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable | expand

Commit Message

Shaoqin Huang June 17, 2024, 7:51 a.m. UTC
When migrating between some of the ARM machines, the BT field value in
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 register is different and not writable. This causes
migration failed.

The BT field means Branch Target Identification mechanism support in
AArch64 state. The value 0 means BT is not implemented, the value 1
means BT is implemented.

Here is an example of the migration if the BT value is different:
* On Migration Src, the BT value is 0.
* On Migration Dst, the BT value is 1.

As it defined in the ftr_id_aa64dfr0, the samller value is safe. So if
we make the BT field writable, on the Migration Dst the BT field will
be overrided with value 0.
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index c9f4f387155f..958e4d251535 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@  static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 		   ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_GIC |
 		   ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AdvSIMD |
 		   ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_FP), },
-	ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
+	ID_WRITABLE(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_BT),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
 	ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
 	ID_WRITABLE(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ~ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_RES0),