| Message ID | 20240623133437.222736-2-leo.yan@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | perf mem: Support multiple Arm SPE PMUs | expand |
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 6:34 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> wrote: > > A platform can have more than one Arm SPE PMU. For example, a system > with multiple clusters may have each cluster enabled with its own Arm > SPE instance. In such case, the PMU devices will be named 'arm_spe_0', > 'arm_spe_1', and so on. > > Currently, the tool only supports 'arm_spe_0'. This commit extends > support to multiple Arm SPE PMUs by detecting the substring 'arm_spe'. > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> > --- > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > index 8b7cb68ba1a8..29cfa1e427ed 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused) > pmu->selectable = true; > pmu->is_uncore = false; > pmu->perf_event_attr_init_default = arm_spe_pmu_default_config; > - if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "arm_spe_0")) > + if (strstr(pmu->name, "arm_spe")) Why not use strstarts? Thanks, Ian > pmu->mem_events = perf_mem_events_arm; > } else if (strstarts(pmu->name, HISI_PTT_PMU_NAME)) { > pmu->selectable = true; > -- > 2.34.1 >
Hi Ian, On 6/24/24 17:16, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 6:34 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> wrote: >> >> A platform can have more than one Arm SPE PMU. For example, a system >> with multiple clusters may have each cluster enabled with its own Arm >> SPE instance. In such case, the PMU devices will be named 'arm_spe_0', >> 'arm_spe_1', and so on. >> >> Currently, the tool only supports 'arm_spe_0'. This commit extends >> support to multiple Arm SPE PMUs by detecting the substring 'arm_spe'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> >> --- >> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c >> index 8b7cb68ba1a8..29cfa1e427ed 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused) >> pmu->selectable = true; >> pmu->is_uncore = false; >> pmu->perf_event_attr_init_default = arm_spe_pmu_default_config; >> - if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "arm_spe_0")) >> + if (strstr(pmu->name, "arm_spe")) > > Why not use strstarts? Indeed, strstarts() is better, will spin for this. Thank for suggestion. Leo
Hello Leo, On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:49:16PM +0100, Leo Yan wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 6/24/24 17:16, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 6:34 AM Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> wrote: > > > > > > A platform can have more than one Arm SPE PMU. For example, a system > > > with multiple clusters may have each cluster enabled with its own Arm > > > SPE instance. In such case, the PMU devices will be named 'arm_spe_0', > > > 'arm_spe_1', and so on. > > > > > > Currently, the tool only supports 'arm_spe_0'. This commit extends > > > support to multiple Arm SPE PMUs by detecting the substring 'arm_spe'. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> > > > --- > > > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > > index 8b7cb68ba1a8..29cfa1e427ed 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused) > > > pmu->selectable = true; > > > pmu->is_uncore = false; > > > pmu->perf_event_attr_init_default = arm_spe_pmu_default_config; > > > - if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "arm_spe_0")) > > > + if (strstr(pmu->name, "arm_spe")) > > > > Why not use strstarts? > > Indeed, strstarts() is better, will spin for this. > > Thank for suggestion. Probably we need to check the last underscore too to prevent potential name clashes.. Thanks, Namhyung
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c index 8b7cb68ba1a8..29cfa1e427ed 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void perf_pmu__arch_init(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused) pmu->selectable = true; pmu->is_uncore = false; pmu->perf_event_attr_init_default = arm_spe_pmu_default_config; - if (!strcmp(pmu->name, "arm_spe_0")) + if (strstr(pmu->name, "arm_spe")) pmu->mem_events = perf_mem_events_arm; } else if (strstarts(pmu->name, HISI_PTT_PMU_NAME)) { pmu->selectable = true;
A platform can have more than one Arm SPE PMU. For example, a system with multiple clusters may have each cluster enabled with its own Arm SPE instance. In such case, the PMU devices will be named 'arm_spe_0', 'arm_spe_1', and so on. Currently, the tool only supports 'arm_spe_0'. This commit extends support to multiple Arm SPE PMUs by detecting the substring 'arm_spe'. Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com> --- tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)