| Message ID | 20240913193357.21899-1-aakash.menon@protempis.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: sparx5: Fix invalid timestamps | expand |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:33:57PM -0700, Aakash Menon wrote: > Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware. > > This issue was observed with 10G SFPs causing huge time errors (> 30ms) in PTP. > > Only 30 bits are needed for the nanosecond part of the timestamp, clear 2 most significant bits before extracting timestamp from the internal frame header. Hi Aakash, Thanks for your patch. I'll leave the review of the code change itself to others, but here is some feedback on process. Please line-wrap patch descriptions at 75 columns wide. Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format Assuming this is a bug fix, a Fixes tag should be present. It should go just before the signed-off-by line (or other tags), with no blank lines in between. I'm wondering if this Fixes tag is appropriate: Fixes: 70dfe25cd866 ("net: sparx5: Update extraction/injection for timestamping") > Signed-off-by: Aakash Menon <aakash.menon@protempis.com> Also, for reference, fixes for Networking should, in general, be targeted at the net tree. Subject: [PATCH net] ... And lastly, if you do post a new patch, be sure to wait 24h since the original patch posting before doing so. Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html ...
> Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware. > > This issue was observed with 10G SFPs causing huge time errors (> 30ms) in PTP. > > Only 30 bits are needed for the nanosecond part of the timestamp, clear 2 most significant bits before extracting timestamp from the internal frame header. > > Signed-off-by: Aakash Menon <aakash.menon@protempis.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c > index f3f5fb420468..a05263488851 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c > @@ -45,8 +45,12 @@ void sparx5_ifh_parse(u32 *ifh, struct frame_info *info) > fwd = (fwd >> 5); > info->src_port = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 1), fwd); > > + /* > + * Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware, > + * clear bits before extracting timestamp > + */ > info->timestamp = > - ((u64)xtr_hdr[2] << 24) | > + ((u64)(xtr_hdr[2] & 0x3F) << 24) | > ((u64)xtr_hdr[3] << 16) | > ((u64)xtr_hdr[4] << 8) | > ((u64)xtr_hdr[5] << 0); > -- > 2.46.0 > Hi Aakash, I will (or somebody else) try to reproduce and test this at the beginning of the next week. Meanwhile, you can address the issues that Simon mentioned. Thanks. /Daniel
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c index f3f5fb420468..a05263488851 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c @@ -45,8 +45,12 @@ void sparx5_ifh_parse(u32 *ifh, struct frame_info *info) fwd = (fwd >> 5); info->src_port = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(7, 1), fwd); + /* + * Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware, + * clear bits before extracting timestamp + */ info->timestamp = - ((u64)xtr_hdr[2] << 24) | + ((u64)(xtr_hdr[2] & 0x3F) << 24) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[3] << 16) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[4] << 8) | ((u64)xtr_hdr[5] << 0);
Bit 270-271 are occasionally unexpectedly set by the hardware. This issue was observed with 10G SFPs causing huge time errors (> 30ms) in PTP. Only 30 bits are needed for the nanosecond part of the timestamp, clear 2 most significant bits before extracting timestamp from the internal frame header. Signed-off-by: Aakash Menon <aakash.menon@protempis.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_packet.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)