Message ID | 20250218171430.28227-4-kristina.martsenko@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: Use memory copy instructions in usercopy routines | expand |
On 18/02/2025 5:14 pm, Kristina Martšenko wrote: > Similarly to what was done with the memcpy() routines, make > copy_to_user(), copy_from_user() and clear_user() also use the Armv8.8 > FEAT_MOPS instructions. > > Both MOPS implementation options (A and B) are supported, including > asymmetric systems. The exception fixup code fixes up the registers > according to the option used. > > In case of a fault the routines return precisely how much was not copied > (as required by the comment in include/linux/uaccess.h), as unprivileged > versions of CPY/SET are guaranteed not to have written past the > addresses reported in the GPRs. > > The MOPS instructions could possibly be inlined into callers (and > patched to branch to the generic implementation if not detected; > similarly to what x86 does), but as a first step this patch just uses > them in the out-of-line routines. > > Signed-off-by: Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h | 4 ++++ > arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S | 10 ++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > index 5b6efe8abeeb..9148f5a31968 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h > @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif > 9999: x; \ > _asm_extable_uaccess 9999b, l > > +#define USER_CPY(l, uaccess_is_write, x...) \ > +9999: x; \ > + _asm_extable_uaccess_cpy 9999b, l, uaccess_is_write > + > /* > * Generate the assembly for LDTR/STTR with exception table entries. > * This is complicated as there is no post-increment or pair versions of the > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S > index a5a5f5b97b17..de9a303b6ad0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S > @@ -17,14 +17,27 @@ > * Alignment fixed up by hardware. > */ > > - .p2align 4 > - // Alignment is for the loop, but since the prologue (including BTI) > - // is also 16 bytes we can keep any padding outside the function > SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_clear_user) > add x2, x0, x1 This subtlety... > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_MOPS > + .arch_extension mops > +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_MOPS > + b .Lno_mops > +alternative_else_nop_endif > + > +USER(9f, setpt [x0]!, x1!, xzr) > +USER(6f, setmt [x0]!, x1!, xzr) > +USER(6f, setet [x0]!, x1!, xzr) > + mov x0, #0 > + ret > +.Lno_mops: > +#endif > + > subs x1, x1, #8 > b.mi 2f > -1: > + > +1: .p2align 4 > USER(9f, sttr xzr, [x0]) > add x0, x0, #8 > subs x1, x1, #8 > @@ -47,6 +60,10 @@ USER(7f, sttrb wzr, [x2, #-1]) > ret > > // Exception fixups > +6: b.cs 9f > + // Registers are in Option A format > + add x0, x0, x1 > + b 9f ...and then all this, is a bit hard to follow IMO. I'd be inclined to just have dedicated "mov x0, x1; ret" and "cneg x0, x1, cc; ret" fixups for the prologue and other ops, rather than entangle them with the non-MOPS flow at all. (Plus then the prologue fixup could arguably be the normal exit path as well...) > 7: sub x0, x2, #5 // Adjust for faulting on the final byte... > 8: add x0, x0, #4 // ...or the second word of the 4-7 byte case > 9: sub x0, x2, x0 > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S > index 34e317907524..400057d607ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S > @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ > stp \reg1, \reg2, [\ptr], \val > .endm > > + .macro cpy1 dst, src, count > + .arch_extension mops > + USER_CPY(9997f, 0, cpyfprt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + USER_CPY(9996f, 0, cpyfmrt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + USER_CPY(9996f, 0, cpyfert [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + .endm > + > end .req x5 > srcin .req x15 > SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_from_user) > @@ -62,6 +69,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_from_user) > ret > > // Exception fixups > +9996: b.cs 9997f > + // Registers are in Option A format > + add dst, dst, count However for copies it's somewhat justified since, IIUC, MOPS aren't guaranteed to make progress if we're starting on the last byte of a page and the next page is unmapped, and thus we may still have a "try harder" requirement similar to the previous alignment fault case, is that right? Thanks, Robin. > 9997: cmp dst, dstin > b.ne 9998f > // Before being absolutely sure we couldn't copy anything, try harder > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S > index 488df234c49a..7f2f5a0e2fb9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S > @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ D_l .req x13 > D_h .req x14 > > mov dst, dstin > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_MOPS > +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_MOPS > + b .Lno_mops > +alternative_else_nop_endif > + cpy1 dst, src, count > + b .Lexitfunc > +.Lno_mops: > +#endif > + > cmp count, #16 > /*When memory length is less than 16, the accessed are not aligned.*/ > b.lo .Ltiny15 > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S > index 802231772608..819f2e3fc7a9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S > @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ > user_stp 9997f, \reg1, \reg2, \ptr, \val > .endm > > + .macro cpy1 dst, src, count > + .arch_extension mops > + USER_CPY(9997f, 1, cpyfpwt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + USER_CPY(9996f, 1, cpyfmwt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + USER_CPY(9996f, 1, cpyfewt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) > + .endm > + > end .req x5 > srcin .req x15 > SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_to_user) > @@ -61,6 +68,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_to_user) > ret > > // Exception fixups > +9996: b.cs 9997f > + // Registers are in Option A format > + add dst, dst, count > 9997: cmp dst, dstin > b.ne 9998f > // Before being absolutely sure we couldn't copy anything, try harder
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h index 5b6efe8abeeb..9148f5a31968 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif 9999: x; \ _asm_extable_uaccess 9999b, l +#define USER_CPY(l, uaccess_is_write, x...) \ +9999: x; \ + _asm_extable_uaccess_cpy 9999b, l, uaccess_is_write + /* * Generate the assembly for LDTR/STTR with exception table entries. * This is complicated as there is no post-increment or pair versions of the diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S index a5a5f5b97b17..de9a303b6ad0 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S @@ -17,14 +17,27 @@ * Alignment fixed up by hardware. */ - .p2align 4 - // Alignment is for the loop, but since the prologue (including BTI) - // is also 16 bytes we can keep any padding outside the function SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_clear_user) add x2, x0, x1 + +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_MOPS + .arch_extension mops +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_MOPS + b .Lno_mops +alternative_else_nop_endif + +USER(9f, setpt [x0]!, x1!, xzr) +USER(6f, setmt [x0]!, x1!, xzr) +USER(6f, setet [x0]!, x1!, xzr) + mov x0, #0 + ret +.Lno_mops: +#endif + subs x1, x1, #8 b.mi 2f -1: + +1: .p2align 4 USER(9f, sttr xzr, [x0]) add x0, x0, #8 subs x1, x1, #8 @@ -47,6 +60,10 @@ USER(7f, sttrb wzr, [x2, #-1]) ret // Exception fixups +6: b.cs 9f + // Registers are in Option A format + add x0, x0, x1 + b 9f 7: sub x0, x2, #5 // Adjust for faulting on the final byte... 8: add x0, x0, #4 // ...or the second word of the 4-7 byte case 9: sub x0, x2, x0 diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S index 34e317907524..400057d607ec 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ stp \reg1, \reg2, [\ptr], \val .endm + .macro cpy1 dst, src, count + .arch_extension mops + USER_CPY(9997f, 0, cpyfprt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + USER_CPY(9996f, 0, cpyfmrt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + USER_CPY(9996f, 0, cpyfert [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + .endm + end .req x5 srcin .req x15 SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_from_user) @@ -62,6 +69,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_from_user) ret // Exception fixups +9996: b.cs 9997f + // Registers are in Option A format + add dst, dst, count 9997: cmp dst, dstin b.ne 9998f // Before being absolutely sure we couldn't copy anything, try harder diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S index 488df234c49a..7f2f5a0e2fb9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ D_l .req x13 D_h .req x14 mov dst, dstin + +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_HAS_MOPS +alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_MOPS + b .Lno_mops +alternative_else_nop_endif + cpy1 dst, src, count + b .Lexitfunc +.Lno_mops: +#endif + cmp count, #16 /*When memory length is less than 16, the accessed are not aligned.*/ b.lo .Ltiny15 diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S index 802231772608..819f2e3fc7a9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ user_stp 9997f, \reg1, \reg2, \ptr, \val .endm + .macro cpy1 dst, src, count + .arch_extension mops + USER_CPY(9997f, 1, cpyfpwt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + USER_CPY(9996f, 1, cpyfmwt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + USER_CPY(9996f, 1, cpyfewt [\dst]!, [\src]!, \count!) + .endm + end .req x5 srcin .req x15 SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_to_user) @@ -61,6 +68,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_copy_to_user) ret // Exception fixups +9996: b.cs 9997f + // Registers are in Option A format + add dst, dst, count 9997: cmp dst, dstin b.ne 9998f // Before being absolutely sure we couldn't copy anything, try harder
Similarly to what was done with the memcpy() routines, make copy_to_user(), copy_from_user() and clear_user() also use the Armv8.8 FEAT_MOPS instructions. Both MOPS implementation options (A and B) are supported, including asymmetric systems. The exception fixup code fixes up the registers according to the option used. In case of a fault the routines return precisely how much was not copied (as required by the comment in include/linux/uaccess.h), as unprivileged versions of CPY/SET are guaranteed not to have written past the addresses reported in the GPRs. The MOPS instructions could possibly be inlined into callers (and patched to branch to the generic implementation if not detected; similarly to what x86 does), but as a first step this patch just uses them in the out-of-line routines. Signed-off-by: Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h | 4 ++++ arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm64/lib/copy_template.S | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S | 10 ++++++++++ 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)