Message ID | 20250331151238.13703-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] drivers/misc: Add NULL check in aspeed_lpc_enable_snoop | expand |
> devm_kasprintf() returns NULL if memory allocation fails. Currently, … call? failed? An other subsystem specification might be more desirable. https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/log/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c?h=next-20250331 … > +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c > @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ static int aspeed_lpc_enable_snoop(struct aspeed_lpc_snoop *lpc_snoop, > lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; > lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.name = > devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s%d", DEVICE_NAME, channel); > + if (!lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.name) > + return -ENOMEM; … Can a blank line be preferred after such a statement? * May the array access be simplified another bit here? * How do you think about to store a pointer to a corresponding data structure member in an additional local variable? Regards, Markus
diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c index 9ab5ba9cf1d6..376b3a910797 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ static int aspeed_lpc_enable_snoop(struct aspeed_lpc_snoop *lpc_snoop, lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s%d", DEVICE_NAME, channel); + if (!lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.name) + return -ENOMEM; lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.fops = &snoop_fops; lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev.parent = dev; rc = misc_register(&lpc_snoop->chan[channel].miscdev);