From patchwork Wed May 13 00:39:45 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Guru Das Srinagesh X-Patchwork-Id: 11544347 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5A314C0 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A549D20753 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="DxwbzDGm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A549D20753 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zTKYbwWpJVlQNwg9sQ9Ucf08mDhd2wKEN5lxRcSbZeQ=; b=DxwbzDGm/S10nfoZUkbS/1nBnu 3RhqlVOGNAw/D2OB51EMG4OyuBIlvyXFD0h7EfTVU+MElprWTHRIPGk3ohZei1JSIA3DoO4psycU9 gMUbAS6AAd42cmeL/JTxEi3YAuXDr5TsvZE0N9Yjv23YdXPtwxPMbj1QBp0gWDpwxKwp4Ql7kNrja j+xUsB+ZMkaJSduUk/RdOvpPJImXF/iosb8k/zgKbAW4ebFbMPyD0axdKE21wb2YxFAoyC9d53RSF PSSIa42E80yPqWGMaMU8xhvjPmNL74ubEZAPNiZcvK8g887oYXAWLlE/qHiT4WUmue15PCYQV6Qu3 S91REC2A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jYfTC-0007uw-03; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:41:58 +0000 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jYfRA-0003pg-Df for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 00:39:55 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg05-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.145]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2020 17:39:48 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg05-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2020 17:39:48 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id 08CE04D95; Tue, 12 May 2020 17:39:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Subject: [RESEND PATCH v14 11/11] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:39:45 -0700 Message-Id: <6e5d54bd655b044c41062805bedb043de4ea06ef.1589330178.git.gurus@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200512_173952_509745_7B5AAE29 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.13 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [199.106.114.38 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Guru Das Srinagesh , Daniel Thompson , Fabio Estevam , Arnd Bergmann , David Collins , Stephen Boyd , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Dan Carpenter , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Joe Perches , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Lee Jones , Guenter Roeck , NXP Linux Team MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the PWM framework so that higher durations may be set. Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c as well as pwm-stm32-lp.c. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Cc: Shawn Guo Cc: Sascha Hauer Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: NXP Linux Team Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh --- drivers/pwm/core.c | 14 +++++++------- drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 +- drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 8 ++++---- include/linux/pwm.h | 12 ++++++------ 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c index bca0496..a2ff6dd 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c @@ -510,12 +510,12 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, last->period > s2.period && last->period <= state->period) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %u, applied: %u, possible: %u)\n", + ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period, last->period); if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %u, applied: %u)\n", + ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period); if (state->enabled && @@ -524,14 +524,14 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle && last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u, possible: %u/%u)\n", + ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period, last->duty_cycle, last->period); if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u)\n", + ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period); @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, (s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) || (s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) { dev_err(chip->dev, - ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u)\n", + ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n", s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period, last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle, last->period); @@ -1284,8 +1284,8 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s) if (state.enabled) seq_puts(s, " enabled"); - seq_printf(s, " period: %u ns", state.period); - seq_printf(s, " duty: %u ns", state.duty_cycle); + seq_printf(s, " period: %llu ns", state.period); + seq_printf(s, " duty: %llu ns", state.duty_cycle); seq_printf(s, " polarity: %s", state.polarity ? "inverse" : "normal"); diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c index 67fca62..134c146 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC); if (!div) { /* Clock is too slow to achieve requested period. */ - dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %u ns\n", state->period); + dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %llu ns\n", state->period); return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c index 2389b86..449dbc0 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static ssize_t period_show(struct device *child, pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.period); + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.period); } static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child, @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child, struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child); struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm; struct pwm_state state; - unsigned int val; + u64 val; int ret; - ret = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val); + ret = kstrtou64(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) return ret; @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_show(struct device *child, pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.duty_cycle); + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.duty_cycle); } static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child, diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index 2635b2a..a13ff38 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ enum pwm_polarity { * current PWM hardware state. */ struct pwm_args { - unsigned int period; + u64 period; enum pwm_polarity polarity; }; @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ enum { * @enabled: PWM enabled status */ struct pwm_state { - unsigned int period; - unsigned int duty_cycle; + u64 period; + u64 duty_cycle; enum pwm_polarity polarity; bool enabled; }; @@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm) return state.enabled; } -static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period) +static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, u64 period) { if (pwm) pwm->state.period = period; } -static inline unsigned int pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) +static inline u64 pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state; @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty) pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty; } -static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) +static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state;