From patchwork Tue May 26 17:35:11 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Guru Das Srinagesh X-Patchwork-Id: 11570993 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CB5913 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 221D320704 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Y5N05m4x" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 221D320704 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YvBn9bieUy3seUjSUayniEo5n20XXcc4fRCqrQxBRHw=; b=Y5N05m4xFbLRgY GIKASKvgmnqm4KRrlHiqHQ/z1150MSkhO8wKAImiTRxBgXafF0KBx9OjVLDqKgkfUhEz/8u17rOy2 f4IBiknn9kZMWWFVSV/0x8dTLiXcma/ZOLgNLWxR8kYZdzRi4y3EHGYGlF7BgWrTmJo+XQ+kx+Skt CRscpnEeVkBOUyqbFqQYqwKH5RvyNpW6/FSaaa1N0HvhHsK4PL+8WIGOKyUY1sf2ePvHky1Xba2Y9 ul5KiwTf05ZOv1oJ5T9uCOPeXSDywSRYCei9b2iy0JY7DE4x3mfL+TLD8zLQEUGp+z88plZBGy+2J +OshojMW+ahU8Xu4hu1w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jddWK-0002Fq-VO; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:37:44 +0000 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jddU1-0008AO-00 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:35:23 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.142]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2020 10:35:14 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2020 10:35:13 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id C04CE4C99; Tue, 26 May 2020 10:35:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Subject: [PATCH v15 11/11] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:35:11 -0700 Message-Id: <727423b783582708e1eaa46c8f398c3bec720477.1590514331.git.gurus@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200526_103521_087450_AB3229F1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.94 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.0 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [199.106.114.38 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Guru Das Srinagesh , Daniel Thompson , Arnd Bergmann , David Collins , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Dan Carpenter , Joe Perches , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Lee Jones , Guenter Roeck Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the PWM framework so that higher durations may be set. Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c as well as pwm-stm32-lp.c. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- drivers/pwm/core.c | 14 +++++++------- drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 +- drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 8 ++++---- include/linux/pwm.h | 12 ++++++------ 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c index bca0496..a2ff6dd 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c @@ -510,12 +510,12 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, last->period > s2.period && last->period <= state->period) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %u, applied: %u, possible: %u)\n", + ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period, last->period); if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %u, applied: %u)\n", + ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period); if (state->enabled && @@ -524,14 +524,14 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle && last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u, possible: %u/%u)\n", + ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period, last->duty_cycle, last->period); if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle) dev_warn(chip->dev, - ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %u/%u, applied: %u/%u)\n", + ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period); @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, (s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) || (s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) { dev_err(chip->dev, - ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %u/%u)\n", + ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n", s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period, last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle, last->period); @@ -1284,8 +1284,8 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s) if (state.enabled) seq_puts(s, " enabled"); - seq_printf(s, " period: %u ns", state.period); - seq_printf(s, " duty: %u ns", state.duty_cycle); + seq_printf(s, " period: %llu ns", state.period); + seq_printf(s, " duty: %llu ns", state.duty_cycle); seq_printf(s, " polarity: %s", state.polarity ? "inverse" : "normal"); diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c index 67fca62..134c146 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC); if (!div) { /* Clock is too slow to achieve requested period. */ - dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %u ns\n", state->period); + dev_dbg(priv->chip.dev, "Can't reach %llu ns\n", state->period); return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c index 2389b86..449dbc0 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static ssize_t period_show(struct device *child, pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.period); + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.period); } static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child, @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ static ssize_t period_store(struct device *child, struct pwm_export *export = child_to_pwm_export(child); struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm; struct pwm_state state; - unsigned int val; + u64 val; int ret; - ret = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &val); + ret = kstrtou64(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) return ret; @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_show(struct device *child, pwm_get_state(pwm, &state); - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", state.duty_cycle); + return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", state.duty_cycle); } static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *child, diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index 2635b2a..a13ff38 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ enum pwm_polarity { * current PWM hardware state. */ struct pwm_args { - unsigned int period; + u64 period; enum pwm_polarity polarity; }; @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ enum { * @enabled: PWM enabled status */ struct pwm_state { - unsigned int period; - unsigned int duty_cycle; + u64 period; + u64 duty_cycle; enum pwm_polarity polarity; bool enabled; }; @@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ static inline bool pwm_is_enabled(const struct pwm_device *pwm) return state.enabled; } -static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period) +static inline void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, u64 period) { if (pwm) pwm->state.period = period; } -static inline unsigned int pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) +static inline u64 pwm_get_period(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state; @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty) pwm->state.duty_cycle = duty; } -static inline unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) +static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct pwm_state state;