From patchwork Tue Dec 22 22:31:15 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Hilman X-Patchwork-Id: 7907701 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD76BEEE5 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03901204B5 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18504204AF for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aBVTD-0005kL-C8; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:31:51 +0000 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aBVTA-0005g8-FC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:31:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o64so112526574pfb.3 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=7cPNkf3sxyC7pl+rRjjkn8uXRQyqGCBK838c9f/7XBM=; b=b6+BnFDfPcuCYN4qdOqynYUqNeh2wsHFy1MJHSd/X8291kvgfXIYr0JOM4deYbM+Cg thKf9oLmXwPMnpgzmp+5qXFHOJz9nFcovxC+2K/WMccq98lCUkML6Knt7hjX109ZU44l jHO9j92NdyAK251HUJ701ajGQoXVVKGrNaIOcGA4nNrlC2CueehA+LNhoyh1dZrY5nw3 QW9kDcoiB4D805TFV+HOMdWvTVtZgVnJ0ucsrHfurc/Ou1rRCAv9sDuvp7LqIem8nHUS yf9X6HCecpS1iXG2gH6V9YCWWII65ogcfnyBMs+9MEnM/DintQwNXwA8t9LEENF+4Gd9 c+4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyi3HbuSYXRVYE0oGhu+8hErzHej0Sytmg30kr34HKdOr7QxzDAmfufywAek3xXrU2ME8jbfJZBDDamV3JgNrzkHibMA== X-Received: by 10.98.73.19 with SMTP id w19mr39596987pfa.103.1450823487159; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-76-104-183-97.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [76.104.183.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cp4sm48001503pad.41.2015.12.22.14.31.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:25 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Hilman To: Mason Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] Sigma Designs Tango4 port References: <566FDF53.3030004@sigmadesigns.com> <7hr3iexp3e.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <5679B15F.80106@free.fr> <7hoadi6wfw.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <5679C743.1070000@free.fr> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:31:15 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5679C743.1070000@free.fr> (Mason's message of "Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:57:23 +0100") Message-ID: <7h60zqund8.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20151222_143148_575868_211BF272 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.45 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm-soc , Olof Johansson , Sebastian Frias , Linux ARM , Marc Gonzalez Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Mason writes: > On 22/12/2015 21:49, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Mason wrote: >> >>> On 22/12/2015 20:25, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> >>>> Was it intentional to leave out a multi_v7_defconfig change so that this >>>> actually builds? Or was that planned for a future series? >>> >>> How is a multi_v7_defconfig different from any old defconfig? >> >> Not sure what you're asking. >> >> The point is that this series doesn't enable any defconfig to build it. > > What is not clear to me is: are you asking me to submit a new defconfig > (specific to my platform), or are you saying I need to add the new > platform to arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig multi_v7_defconfig, which is what I've been assuming you've been testing it with. Is that correct? > (I'm not sure how exactly > to go about doing that; also I'm concerned about merge conflicts, since > my patch set is based on v4.1) The latter. Something like below[1]. Just keep the multi_v7_defconfig patch as a separate patch, and we'll take care of the merge conflicts when applying to the relevant arm-soc branches. > >>>> IMO, it should be part of this series so it gets build tested as soon as >>>> it's merged. >>> >>> The problem is that a mandatory driver is missing upstream >>> (interrupt controller). >>> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2089470 >> >> Which means it presumably wont boot without that, but it should still >> build without it, correct? (I tried it locally, and it does.) > > Can I submit the defconfig update as a follow-up patch? IMO, it should be part of this series that adds the platform. That way, as soon as it gets merged, it will be automatically build tested by various automated builders. (also note that it would be automatically boot tested if I had the hardware as well... hint, hint) ;) Kevin [1] diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 69a22fdb52a5..d5aa59b148da 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_R8A7794=y CONFIG_ARCH_SH73A0=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y CONFIG_ARCH_SIRF=y +CONFIG_ARCH_TANGO=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC=y