From patchwork Fri Apr 24 15:33:59 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Maxime Ripard X-Patchwork-Id: 11508293 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A71313B2 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D0620767 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="A6dQHoON"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=cerno.tech header.i=@cerno.tech header.b="wLAisAiy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="pOPZ0yzo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 30D0620767 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cerno.tech Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=AYbyvOOSpTT1g1K/WvLXny1Wh2D5fhqr+9N6VQQx7K0=; b=A6dQHoON7TWPmZ 8DBfby3TR8nofrpZVQLVDsS6feTOBrwGL7X54/KkJFl/5MLNwL3n9zdtl9zBtCyBou23NnUusRI0n eQuJtbZGPJzOrg34R9nJMJdSK0idhi37oemQQcw9TgKLmkgDnrnyjzOzA8miWCyCm4gHFjzq1VliE FlMseSGKPGWMaoTbAaHEhwLWB0VBOQpxq5iBehG/icbrhnmavccHkzjsq9FVn38grp9UNVNbVl+1F vAEPpQFwew+cs727Q9Mbvti9pZEzlKX5psxWckms+SdBj6BmOOsCgdzkU4RZkrm05Cf7XpuXSFICM AmLY2U0Q5BylK07RMkBw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jS0Tc-0007BY-Jj; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:42:52 +0000 Received: from wnew2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.27]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jS0Mo-0007fp-4j; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:35:51 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD4CFE1; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:35:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:35:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cerno.tech; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=T8s1l/eHXLqjb GsnVx39DFYxMbKPbICndFwvcL7Ds6w=; b=wLAisAiyYbfQvTkXuEAjdrG9KRY3n Dx1T0/bwFiTD5syqI21YR3uM17XYdJMNsxVnR71QYAc2Twn8VJ4vZJFRBpTT145Y qzOKYXKxYHTF1whDoyM0XKTLUQE3aqexzRJymxlPuyECyPlXWoKfht89TWQA5Vo2 bm9ZDtUQ8fQ7r2ns2RfGfSlEzdWu8j/2UyhfPygoeFShV8t1K9aGQrmu+EjOFZE6 gcs8KimMxl6aGF7u0kLDl/MO8j2BHTKIBc7qsBYM7L4gT0x4pLwzG7fuXtPHFeC9 8DPj7dP5Ijm8YoUXM60vb3fEs+/fmHiN8HiBfF9n/+xIM1oVojj0d9CUA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=T8s1l/eHXLqjbGsnVx39DFYxMbKPbICndFwvcL7Ds6w=; b=pOPZ0yzo 24J+JQgsmWbxS0MVBJP4wG+RjLvju3QGR/XGGvO/D2qOCyLiPIUR21xAqVL2i8zJ MaMXrW2txyNdTgtVoJd6+l/pV0uYrUo25x+mrITDf5ldoNsnLNIiKVto3ejXpwPb AagXjCYYsEg8ZanUpIPXoMT5BdxGN9IJGzy35EmGgzs3zNnJDuujr7n39wqx+eyM IB3Neozp8hamoJ/dZQkFbr+zW3LsI3hJpeFZ3Rl43UZzc2PH1q+VoKmUhxe7b43o tW4lz49746NstfSyBz12Mg99tRYSn5X/3VoNuXSrYRds4CBXZtS5kbGRL8UsjEXU 85dYT35bH27oKg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrhedugdekiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepofgrgihimhgv ucftihhprghrugcuoehmrgigihhmvgestggvrhhnohdrthgvtghhqeenucfkphepledtrd ekledrieekrdejieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpeduheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomhepmhgrgihimhgvsegtvghrnhhordhtvggthh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (lfbn-tou-1-1502-76.w90-89.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.89.68.76]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 91E9F3280067; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:35:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Maxime Ripard To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Eric Anholt Subject: [PATCH v2 18/91] clk: bcm: rpi: Make the PLLB registration function return a clk_hw Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:33:59 +0200 Message-Id: <853ce991ff4dc9c8991091bff4ec6670bf14f583.1587742492.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200424_083550_341172_92C1E646 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.21 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.147.123.27 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tim Gover , Dave Stevenson , Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Phil Elwell , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Ripard Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The raspberrypi_register_pllb has been returning an integer so far to notify whether the functions has exited successfully or not. However, the OF provider functions in the clock framework require access to the clk_hw structure so that we can expose those clocks to device tree consumers. Since we'll want that for the future clocks, let's return a clk_hw pointer instead of the return code. Cc: Michael Turquette Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c index 8c88d2ea1d67..677d7f3e8d2e 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops raspberrypi_firmware_pll_clk_ops = { .determine_rate = raspberrypi_pll_determine_rate, }; -static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) +static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) { struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data; struct clk_init_data init = {}; @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) data = devm_kzalloc(rpi->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); if (!data) - return -ENOMEM; + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); data->rpi = rpi; data->id = RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID; @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) if (ret) { dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s min freq: %d\n", init.name, ret); - return ret; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data, @@ -226,13 +226,13 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) if (ret) { dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to get %s max freq: %d\n", init.name, ret); - return ret; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } if (!min_rate || !max_rate) { dev_err(rpi->dev, "Unexpected frequency range: min %u, max %u\n", min_rate, max_rate); - return -EINVAL; + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } dev_info(rpi->dev, "CPU frequency range: min %u, max %u\n", @@ -243,7 +243,11 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) data->hw.init = &init; - return devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &data->hw); + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &data->hw); + if (ret) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + return &data->hw; } static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = { @@ -258,14 +262,14 @@ static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = { }, }; -static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) +static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) { int ret; ret = devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw); if (ret) { dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize pllb_arm\n"); - return ret; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } ret = devm_clk_hw_register_clkdev(rpi->dev, @@ -273,10 +277,10 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi) NULL, "cpu0"); if (ret) { dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize clkdev\n"); - return ret; + return ERR_PTR(ret); } - return 0; + return &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw; } static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -285,7 +289,7 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; struct rpi_firmware *firmware; struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi; - int ret; + struct clk_hw *hw; /* * We can be probed either through the an old-fashioned @@ -314,15 +318,15 @@ static int raspberrypi_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) rpi->firmware = firmware; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpi); - ret = raspberrypi_register_pllb(rpi); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pllb, %d\n", ret); - return ret; + hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb(rpi); + if (IS_ERR(hw)) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize pllb, %ld\n", PTR_ERR(hw)); + return PTR_ERR(hw); } - ret = raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(rpi); - if (ret) - return ret; + hw = raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(rpi); + if (IS_ERR(hw)) + return PTR_ERR(hw); rpi->cpufreq = platform_device_register_data(dev, "raspberrypi-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);