Message ID | 87o9321uk3.fsf@belgarion.home (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] pxa for v5.2 | expand |
Hi Robert, On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:18:36PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi Arnd, Kevin, and Olof, > > This is the pxa pull request for 5.2. Can you please consider pulling ? > > The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9: > > Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://github.com/rjarzmik/linux.git tags/pxa-for-5.3 > > for you to fetch changes up to e0c5facc5bbfcae6fce6ce11b78981ede1535276: > > ARM: pxa/lubbock: remove lubbock_set_misc_wr() from global view (2019-06-12 12:17:48 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the pxa changes for 5.2 cycle : > - a simple cleanup for lubbock > - devicetree pinmux support for bias on pxa3xx > - devicetree pinmux bias usage for raumfeld > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Daniel Mack (5): > ARM: pxa3xx: dts: Add defines for pinctrl-single,bias-pull{up,down} > ARM: pxa: raumfeld-controller: fix 'dock detect' GPIO key > ARM: pxa: raumfeld-controller: add pinctrl for charger pins > ARM: pxa: raumfeld-common: fix comments in gpio_keys pinctrl node > ARM: dts: pxa300-raumfeld-speaker-one: add channel output mapping for STA320 > > Russell King (1): > ARM: pxa/lubbock: remove lubbock_set_misc_wr() from global view > > arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa300-raumfeld-common.dtsi | 6 +++--- > arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa300-raumfeld-controller.dts | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa300-raumfeld-speaker-one.dts | 3 +++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa3xx.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/lubbock.h | 4 ---- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c | 3 +-- > 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) We usually separate changes to mach-* and DTS into separate branches unless they have some dependencies (and even then, we usually try to base one on the other for visibility's sake). Would you mind respin these into two pull requests? Thanks, -Olof
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> writes: > Hi Robert, > We usually separate changes to mach-* and DTS into separate branches unless > they have some dependencies (and even then, we usually try to base one on the > other for visibility's sake). Ah ok, that's what I usually do, but I thought I was "outdated" and that nowadays you didn't mind anymore ... > Would you mind respin these into two pull requests? Of course not, I'll do it straight away. Cheers.