@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi.0", &spi0_clk),
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("spi_clk", "atmel_spi.1", &spi1_clk),
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t0_clk", "atmel_tcb.0", &tcb_clk),
- CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("ssc", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
- CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("ssc", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
+ CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
+ CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
};
static struct clk_lookup usart_clocks_lookups[] = {
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static struct clk_lookup periph_clocks_lookups[] = {
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t0_clk", "atmel_tcb.1", &tc3_clk),
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t1_clk", "atmel_tcb.1", &tc4_clk),
CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("t2_clk", "atmel_tcb.1", &tc5_clk),
- CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("ssc", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
- CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("ssc", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
- CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("ssc", "ssc.2", &ssc2_clk),
+ CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.0", &ssc0_clk),
+ CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.1", &ssc1_clk),
+ CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID("pclk", "ssc.2", &ssc2_clk),
};
static struct clk_lookup usart_clocks_lookups[] = {
Hello, I am not 100% sure this is the right thing to do, but it makes the atmel-ssc driver happy on my at91rm9200 board. This unifies the con_id across all at91 machines. The atmel-ssc driver expects the con_id to be "pclk" or it will fail probing. Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood <joachim.eastwood@jotron.com> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)