diff mbox

ARM: VIC: use irq_domain_add_simple()

Message ID CACRpkdbtn4Pz3uLCxDGOBSVW7vfLECf2UZkT5+X9ip1ZZFb8Lw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Linus Walleij Dec. 20, 2012, 6:45 p.m. UTC
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Grant Likely
<grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

> It looks to me like the below patch breaks versatile because it makes
> it try to register a linear irq_domain instead of the legacy one that
> it needs. Here are the relevant commits:
>
> 07c9249f1: "ARM: 7554/1: VIC: use irq_domain_add_simple()"
> 946c59a08: "ARM: vic: fix build warning caused by previous commit"
>
> I'm working on getting it properly sorted out (and more importantly
> *simplified*), but in the mean time I think the above two commits need
> to be reverted. Reverting them on my tree fixes booting for me.

Isn't that a bit violent, can't we just fix the real bug?

Does the below patch work for you, it does two things:

1) Bump all Versatile IRQs to offset at 32, because it is using
  IRQ 0 which is NO_IRQ and illegal anyway so it's anyway
  a bug that should be fixed.

2) Make sure we call irq_create_mapping() if the start IRQ is
  anyway 0, as in the device tree case, and make sure to
  actually pass zero in that case.

The initial patch set used negative IRQ as an indicator that
the linear domain should be used and not descriptors
allocated, but as that require changing a lot of singatures
to signed int and since IRQ 0 is now illegal anyway, I
let zero signify linear. Sorry for leftover mistakes like this...

I'll mail them out as separate patches too, and submit to
Russell's tracker if they fix the problem.



Yours,
Linus Walleij

Comments

Linus Walleij Dec. 26, 2012, 12:43 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Grant Likely
> <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
>> It looks to me like the below patch breaks versatile because it makes
>> it try to register a linear irq_domain instead of the legacy one that
>> it needs. Here are the relevant commits:
>>
>> 07c9249f1: "ARM: 7554/1: VIC: use irq_domain_add_simple()"
>> 946c59a08: "ARM: vic: fix build warning caused by previous commit"
>>
>> I'm working on getting it properly sorted out (and more importantly
>> *simplified*), but in the mean time I think the above two commits need
>> to be reverted. Reverting them on my tree fixes booting for me.
>
> Isn't that a bit violent, can't we just fix the real bug?
>
> Does the below patch work for you, it does two things:

I've submitted the fixes to Russell's patch tracker now ... would
appreciate some testing but I'm pretty sure they will fix the issue.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Grant Likely Jan. 11, 2013, 6:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:45:24 +0100, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Grant Likely
> <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> 
> > It looks to me like the below patch breaks versatile because it makes
> > it try to register a linear irq_domain instead of the legacy one that
> > it needs. Here are the relevant commits:
> >
> > 07c9249f1: "ARM: 7554/1: VIC: use irq_domain_add_simple()"
> > 946c59a08: "ARM: vic: fix build warning caused by previous commit"

(sorry for the really late reply on this. I took a break at Christmas
and jetlag has been beating up my concentration since I got back. I
actually started writing this reply before Christmas, but the
investigation sidetracked me enough that I never finished it.)

> > I'm working on getting it properly sorted out (and more importantly
> > *simplified*), but in the mean time I think the above two commits need
> > to be reverted. Reverting them on my tree fixes booting for me.
> 
> Isn't that a bit violent, can't we just fix the real bug?

I did try to fix the bug first, but it became more involved that I would
like for a stablization change (and I went down a lot of rabbit trails
in the process). I preferred reverting because this was all contained
to a single driver which can be backed out easily to have another cycle
for a correct fix. I did try your change though...

> Does the below patch work for you, it does two things:
> 
> 1) Bump all Versatile IRQs to offset at 32, because it is using
>   IRQ 0 which is NO_IRQ and illegal anyway so it's anyway
>   a bug that should be fixed.
> 
> 2) Make sure we call irq_create_mapping() if the start IRQ is
>   anyway 0, as in the device tree case, and make sure to
>   actually pass zero in that case.

In actual fact, only changing the offset to 32 is required to get
Versatile to boot with DT. That platform doesn't yet use vic_of_init().
It currently depends on pre-allocated irq_descs. Calling
irq_create_mapping() doesn't resolve this. I now have patches to rework
the versatile OF support to use irq_of_init(), but they aren't ready
for posting yet. Merging the bump to offset 32 would be fine for now.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
> b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
> index bf44c61..0fd771c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>   *  IRQ interrupts definitions are the same as the INT definitions
>   *  held within platform.h
>   */
> -#define IRQ_VIC_START		0
> +#define IRQ_VIC_START		32
>  #define IRQ_WDOGINT		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_WDOGINT)
>  #define IRQ_SOFTINT		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_SOFTINT)
>  #define IRQ_COMMRx		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_COMMRx)
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
>  /*
>   * Secondary interrupt controller
>   */
> -#define IRQ_SIC_START		32
> +#define IRQ_SIC_START		64

Since you're touching this line anyway, please change to:

#define IRQ_SIC_START			(IRQ_VIC_START + 32)

>  #define IRQ_SIC_MMCI0B 		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_MMCI0B)
>  #define IRQ_SIC_MMCI1B 		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_MMCI1B)
>  #define IRQ_SIC_KMI0		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_KMI0)
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
>  #define IRQ_SIC_PCI1		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI1)
>  #define IRQ_SIC_PCI2		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI2)
>  #define IRQ_SIC_PCI3		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI3)
> -#define IRQ_SIC_END		63
> +#define IRQ_SIC_END		95

Similarly here: #define IRQ_SIC_END (IRQ_SIC_START + 31)

And then you can add my acked by for the irq number changes.

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

g.
Linus Walleij Jan. 11, 2013, 8:38 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:

>> Does the below patch work for you, it does two things:
>>
>> 1) Bump all Versatile IRQs to offset at 32, because it is using
>>   IRQ 0 which is NO_IRQ and illegal anyway so it's anyway
>>   a bug that should be fixed.
>>
>> 2) Make sure we call irq_create_mapping() if the start IRQ is
>>   anyway 0, as in the device tree case, and make sure to
>>   actually pass zero in that case.
>
> In actual fact, only changing the offset to 32 is required to get
> Versatile to boot with DT. That platform doesn't yet use vic_of_init().
> It currently depends on pre-allocated irq_descs.

OK both are already upstream, because there was someone
else verifying they solved the problem.

And the second patch was needed on the Integrator which
does use SPARSE_IRQ + vic_init_of().
Probably the DT-based SPEArs need it too.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/vic.c b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
index e4df17c..8f324b9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/vic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/vic.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@  static void __init vic_register(void __iomem
*base, unsigned int irq,
 				struct device_node *node)
 {
 	struct vic_device *v;
+	int i;

 	if (vic_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(vic_devices)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too few VICs, increase CONFIG_ARM_VIC_NR\n", __func__);
@@ -220,6 +221,10 @@  static void __init vic_register(void __iomem
*base, unsigned int irq,
 	vic_id++;
 	v->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(node, fls(valid_sources), irq,
 					  &vic_irqdomain_ops, v);
+	/* create an IRQ mapping for each valid IRQ */
+	for (i = 0; i < fls(valid_sources); i++)
+		if (valid_sources & (1 << i))
+			irq_create_mapping(v->domain, i);
 }

 static void vic_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -416,9 +421,9 @@  int __init vic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
struct device_node *parent)
 		return -EIO;

 	/*
-	 * Passing -1 as first IRQ makes the simple domain allocate descriptors
+	 * Passing 0 as first IRQ makes the simple domain allocate descriptors
 	 */
-	__vic_init(regs, -1, ~0, ~0, node);
+	__vic_init(regs, 0, ~0, ~0, node);

 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
index bf44c61..0fd771c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/irqs.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ 
  *  IRQ interrupts definitions are the same as the INT definitions
  *  held within platform.h
  */
-#define IRQ_VIC_START		0
+#define IRQ_VIC_START		32
 #define IRQ_WDOGINT		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_WDOGINT)
 #define IRQ_SOFTINT		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_SOFTINT)
 #define IRQ_COMMRx		(IRQ_VIC_START + INT_COMMRx)
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ 
 /*
  * Secondary interrupt controller
  */
-#define IRQ_SIC_START		32
+#define IRQ_SIC_START		64
 #define IRQ_SIC_MMCI0B 		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_MMCI0B)
 #define IRQ_SIC_MMCI1B 		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_MMCI1B)
 #define IRQ_SIC_KMI0		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_KMI0)
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ 
 #define IRQ_SIC_PCI1		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI1)
 #define IRQ_SIC_PCI2		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI2)
 #define IRQ_SIC_PCI3		(IRQ_SIC_START + SIC_INT_PCI3)
-#define IRQ_SIC_END		63
+#define IRQ_SIC_END		95

 #define IRQ_GPIO0_START		(IRQ_SIC_END + 1)
 #define IRQ_GPIO0_END		(IRQ_GPIO0_START + 31)