[09/10] ARM: dmabounce: get rid of dma_needs_bounce global function

Message ID	E1QderV-0000Ze-3q@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk (mailing list archive)
State	New, archived
Headers	show Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by demeter2.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p648rYLX030261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:53:55 GMT In-Reply-To: <20110704084711.GN21898@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110704084711.GN21898@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 09/10] ARM: dmabounce: get rid of dma_needs_bounce global function MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <E1QderV-0000Ze-3q@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:50:37 +0100 summary: Content analysis details: (1.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS To: misformatted and no rDNS Cc: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Precedence: list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c index 4f13505..595ecd2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct dmabounce_device_info { struct dmabounce_pool large; rwlock_t lock; + + int (*needs_bounce)(struct device *, dma_addr_t, size_t); }; #ifdef STATS @@ -236,7 +238,7 @@ static int needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size) return 1; } - return dma_needs_bounce(dev, dma_addr, size) ? 1 : 0; + return !!dev->archdata.dmabounce->needs_bounce(dev, dma_addr, size); } static inline dma_addr_t map_single(struct device *dev, void *ptr, size_t size, @@ -430,7 +432,8 @@ static int dmabounce_init_pool(struct dmabounce_pool *pool, struct device *dev, } int dmabounce_register_dev(struct device *dev, unsigned long small_buffer_size, - unsigned long large_buffer_size) + unsigned long large_buffer_size, + int (*needs_bounce_fn)(struct device *, dma_addr_t, size_t)) { struct dmabounce_device_info *device_info; int ret; @@ -466,6 +469,7 @@ int dmabounce_register_dev(struct device *dev, unsigned long small_buffer_size, device_info->dev = dev; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device_info->safe_buffers); rwlock_init(&device_info->lock); + device_info->needs_bounce = needs_bounce_fn; #ifdef STATS device_info->total_allocs = 0; diff --git a/arch/arm/common/it8152.c b/arch/arm/common/it8152.c index 7a21927..80b49e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/it8152.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/it8152.c @@ -243,6 +243,13 @@ static struct resource it8152_mem = { * ITE8152 chip can address up to 64MByte, so all the devices * connected to ITE8152 (PCI and USB) should have limited DMA window */ +static int it8152_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size) +{ + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: dma_addr %08x, size %08x\n", + __func__, dma_addr, size); + return dev->bus == &pci_bus_type && + (dma_addr + size - PHYS_OFFSET) >= SZ_64M; +} /* * Setup DMA mask to 64MB on devices connected to ITE8152. Ignore all @@ -254,7 +261,7 @@ static int it8152_pci_platform_notify(struct device *dev) if (dev->dma_mask) *dev->dma_mask = (SZ_64M - 1) | PHYS_OFFSET; dev->coherent_dma_mask = (SZ_64M - 1) | PHYS_OFFSET; - dmabounce_register_dev(dev, 2048, 4096); + dmabounce_register_dev(dev, 2048, 4096, it8152_needs_bounce); } return 0; } @@ -267,14 +274,6 @@ static int it8152_pci_platform_notify_remove(struct device *dev) return 0; } -int dma_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size) -{ - dev_dbg(dev, "%s: dma_addr %08x, size %08x\n", - __func__, dma_addr, size); - return (dev->bus == &pci_bus_type) && - ((dma_addr + size - PHYS_OFFSET) >= SZ_64M); -} - int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { if (mask >= PHYS_OFFSET + SZ_64M - 1) diff --git a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c index 9c49a46..0569de6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c @@ -579,7 +579,36 @@ sa1111_configure_smc(struct sa1111 *sachip, int sdram, unsigned int drac, sachip->dev->coherent_dma_mask &= sa1111_dma_mask[drac >> 2]; } +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_DMABOUNCE +/* + * According to the "Intel StrongARM SA-1111 Microprocessor Companion + * Chip Specification Update" (June 2000), erratum #7, there is a + * significant bug in the SA1111 SDRAM shared memory controller. If + * an access to a region of memory above 1MB relative to the bank base, + * it is important that address bit 10 _NOT_ be asserted. Depending + * on the configuration of the RAM, bit 10 may correspond to one + * of several different (processor-relative) address bits. + * + * This routine only identifies whether or not a given DMA address + * is susceptible to the bug. + * + * This should only get called for sa1111_device types due to the + * way we configure our device dma_masks. + */ +static int sa1111_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) +{ + /* + * Section 4.6 of the "Intel StrongARM SA-1111 Development Module + * User's Guide" mentions that jumpers R51 and R52 control the + * target of SA-1111 DMA (either SDRAM bank 0 on Assabet, or + * SDRAM bank 1 on Neponset). The default configuration selects + * Assabet, so any address in bank 1 is necessarily invalid. + */ + return (machine_is_assabet() || machine_is_pfs168()) && + (addr >= 0xc8000000 || (addr + size) >= 0xc8000000); +} #endif static void sa1111_dev_release(struct device *_dev) @@ -644,7 +673,8 @@ sa1111_init_one_child(struct sa1111 *sachip, struct resource *parent, dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dma_mask; if (dev->dma_mask != 0xffffffffUL) { - ret = dmabounce_register_dev(&dev->dev, 1024, 4096); + ret = dmabounce_register_dev(&dev->dev, 1024, 4096, + sa1111_needs_bounce); if (ret) { dev_err(&dev->dev, "SA1111: Failed to register" " with dmabounce\n"); @@ -818,34 +848,6 @@ static void __sa1111_remove(struct sa1111 *sachip) kfree(sachip); } -/* - * According to the "Intel StrongARM SA-1111 Microprocessor Companion - * Chip Specification Update" (June 2000), erratum #7, there is a - * significant bug in the SA1111 SDRAM shared memory controller. If - * an access to a region of memory above 1MB relative to the bank base, - * it is important that address bit 10 _NOT_ be asserted. Depending - * on the configuration of the RAM, bit 10 may correspond to one - * of several different (processor-relative) address bits. - * - * This routine only identifies whether or not a given DMA address - * is susceptible to the bug. - * - * This should only get called for sa1111_device types due to the - * way we configure our device dma_masks. - */ -int dma_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) -{ - /* - * Section 4.6 of the "Intel StrongARM SA-1111 Development Module - * User's Guide" mentions that jumpers R51 and R52 control the - * target of SA-1111 DMA (either SDRAM bank 0 on Assabet, or - * SDRAM bank 1 on Neponset). The default configuration selects - * Assabet, so any address in bank 1 is necessarily invalid. - */ - return ((machine_is_assabet() || machine_is_pfs168()) && - (addr >= 0xc8000000 || (addr + size) >= 0xc8000000)); -} - struct sa1111_save_data { unsigned int skcr; unsigned int skpcr; diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h index d2903d0..4ad2533 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ int dma_mmap_writecombine(struct device *, struct vm_area_struct *, * @dev: valid struct device pointer * @small_buf_size: size of buffers to use with small buffer pool * @large_buf_size: size of buffers to use with large buffer pool (can be 0) + * @needs_bounce_fn: called to determine whether buffer needs bouncing * * This function should be called by low-level platform code to register * a device as requireing DMA buffer bouncing. The function will allocate * appropriate DMA pools for the device. - * */ extern int dmabounce_register_dev(struct device *, unsigned long, - unsigned long); + unsigned long, int (*)(struct device *, dma_addr_t, size_t)); /** * dmabounce_unregister_dev @@ -277,24 +277,6 @@ extern int dmabounce_register_dev(struct device *, unsigned long, */ extern void dmabounce_unregister_dev(struct device *); -/** - * dma_needs_bounce - * - * @dev: valid struct device pointer - * @dma_handle: dma_handle of unbounced buffer - * @size: size of region being mapped - * - * Platforms that utilize the dmabounce mechanism must implement - * this function. - * - * The dmabounce routines call this function whenever a dma-mapping - * is requested to determine whether a given buffer needs to be bounced - * or not. The function must return 0 if the buffer is OK for - * DMA access and 1 if the buffer needs to be bounced. - * - */ -extern int dma_needs_bounce(struct device*, dma_addr_t, size_t); - /* * The DMA API, implemented by dmabounce.c. See below for descriptions. */ diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common-pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common-pci.c index e9a5893..d7db10c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common-pci.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common-pci.c @@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ static int abort_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *r } +static int ixp4xx_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size) +{ + return dev->bus == &pci_bus_type && (dma_addr + size) >= SZ_64M; +} + /* * Setup DMA mask to 64MB on PCI devices. Ignore all other devices. */ @@ -324,7 +329,7 @@ static int ixp4xx_pci_platform_notify(struct device *dev) if(dev->bus == &pci_bus_type) { *dev->dma_mask = SZ_64M - 1; dev->coherent_dma_mask = SZ_64M - 1; - dmabounce_register_dev(dev, 2048, 4096); + dmabounce_register_dev(dev, 2048, 4096, ixp4xx_needs_bounce); } return 0; } @@ -337,11 +342,6 @@ static int ixp4xx_pci_platform_notify_remove(struct device *dev) return 0; } -int dma_needs_bounce(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size) -{ - return (dev->bus == &pci_bus_type ) && ((dma_addr + size) >= SZ_64M); -} - void __init ixp4xx_pci_preinit(void) { unsigned long cpuid = read_cpuid_id();

[09/10] ARM: dmabounce: get rid of dma_needs_bounce global function

Commit Message

Patch