| Message ID | f5642fad5d7a97772ae22c76840c5c51ee79ec0f.1738257860.git.Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enable Power Modes Support for SAMA7D65 SoC | expand |
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:33:48AM -0700, Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com wrote: > From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com> > > Add SAMA7D65 RTT compatible to DT bindings documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml > index a7f6c1d1a08ab..078b753f453b4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml > @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ properties: > - microchip,sam9x60-rtt > - microchip,sam9x7-rtt > - const: atmel,at91sam9260-rtt > + - items: > + - enum: > + - microchip,sama7d65-rtt > + - const: microchip,sama7g5-rtt > + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-rtt Does being compatible with 7g5 provide something over 9260? If not, probably better to just have 9260 as the only fallback. > - items: > - const: microchip,sama7g5-rtt > - const: microchip,sam9x60-rtt > -- > 2.43.0 >
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml index a7f6c1d1a08ab..078b753f453b4 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/atmel,at91sam9260-rtt.yaml @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ properties: - microchip,sam9x60-rtt - microchip,sam9x7-rtt - const: atmel,at91sam9260-rtt + - items: + - enum: + - microchip,sama7d65-rtt + - const: microchip,sama7g5-rtt + - const: atmel,at91sam9260-rtt - items: - const: microchip,sama7g5-rtt - const: microchip,sam9x60-rtt