Message ID | 20231101-b4-camss-named-power-domains-v3-0-bbdf5f22462a@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | media: qcom: camss: Introduce support for named power-domains | expand |
On 1.11.2023 12.54, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > V3: > - Includes bugfix reported on IRC > genpd_link and genpd should be checked for NULL on the cleanup path. > Matti Lehtimäki > - Retains NULL check before dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() > I experimented with the suggested drop but of_property_match_string() > chokes > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/883ce8a7-80e1-4065-a957-424d0b4a6535@linaro.org/T/#m10e5a43d0245f13eca177ef2f65b24259c641030 > Konrad > - Fixes spelling caught by codespell - Konrad > > Link: https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/b4/b4-camss-named-power-domains-v3 > sm8250-testable: https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/b4/b4-camss-named-power-domains-v3+sm8250 > > V2: > - Incorporates Konrad's suggestion re: removing 'id' > - Adds RB - Konrad > - Adds in a flag to indicate if a VFE has a power domain. > As I rebased this series I realised we had some magic indexing for VFE v > VFE Lite, which isn't the root cause of my bug bear in this series but is > the same sin - inferring functionality from indexing. > Once we transition fully to named pds we won't need a 'has_pd' to flag > which VFEs need power-domain attachment and which don't. > That transition will require populating all upstream dtsi with pd-names > and then deprecating the old way. > has_pd is a far better choice than inferring from indexes so, I've added. > > Link: https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/commits/aa45a2b58aa1e187a2698a65164d694251f08fa1 > > V1: > At the moment the Qcom CAMSS driver relies on the declaration order of > power-domains within the dtsi to determine which power-domain relates to a > VFE and which power-domain relates to the top-level (top) CAMSS > power-domain. > > VFE power-domains must be declared prior to the top power-domain. The top > power-domain must be declared last. Early SoCs have just one top > power-domain with later SoCs introducing VFE specific power-domains. > > Differentiating between the number of power-domains results in lots of code > which is brittle and which we can mostly get rid of with named > power-domains. > > The reliance on declaration ordering is in-effect magic number indexing. > > This series introduces named power-domains for CAMSS and refactors some of > the code in CAMSS to support the new named power-domains. We continue to > support the legacy indexing model with an intention to remove after a > reasonable transition period. > > New SoC additions should use named power-domains from now on. > > Tested on x13s, rb5, db410c > > Link: https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/linux-next-23-10-23-camss-named-power-domains > > Bryan O'Donoghue (5): > media: qcom: camss: Flag which VFEs require a power-domain > media: qcom: camss: Convert to per-VFE pointer for power-domain > linkages > media: qcom: camss: Use common VFE pm_domain_on/pm_domain_off where > applicable > media: qcom: camss: Move VFE power-domain specifics into vfe.c > media: qcom: camss: Add support for named power-domains > > .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c | 36 -------- > .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-1.c | 8 +- > .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-7.c | 36 -------- > .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-8.c | 31 ------- > .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-480.c | 36 -------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++ > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.h | 16 ++++ > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 87 ++++++++++++------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h | 7 +- > 9 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.42.0 > > --- > Bryan O'Donoghue (5): > media: qcom: camss: Flag which VFEs require a power-domain > media: qcom: camss: Convert to per-VFE pointer for power-domain linkages > media: qcom: camss: Use common VFE pm_domain_on/pm_domain_off where applicable > media: qcom: camss: Move VFE power-domain specifics into vfe.c > media: qcom: camss: Add support for named power-domains > > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c | 36 ---------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-1.c | 8 +-- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-7.c | 36 ---------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-8.c | 31 -------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-480.c | 36 ---------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.h | 16 +++++ > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 87 ++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h | 7 +- > 9 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 48016737a9af47328dd321df4dd3479ed5e2041d > change-id: 20231031-b4-camss-named-power-domains-cc2ac2722543 > > Best regards, Tested the series using work in progress SC7280 CAMSS. Power domain handling works correctly. For the series: Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>