mbox series

[RFC,0/2] Support mailbox interface in qcom,smsm driver

Message ID 20240424-smsm-mbox-v1-0-555f3f442841@z3ntu.xyz (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Support mailbox interface in qcom,smsm driver | expand

Message

Luca Weiss April 24, 2024, 5:21 p.m. UTC 
Take a shot at converting the last driver that requires direct
"qcom,ipc*" syscon references in devicetree by allowing the smsm driver
to use the mailbox interface to achieve the same effect.

I'm not very happy about how the devicetree change looks in the end.
Perhaps it's better to use mbox-names to not have <0> elements in dt,
and reference the items by name from the driver?

e.g. this change for msm8226 could be represented differently.

-		qcom,ipc-1 = <&apcs 8 13>;
-		qcom,ipc-2 = <&apcs 8 9>;
-		qcom,ipc-3 = <&apcs 8 19>;
+		mboxes = <0>, <&apcs 13>, <&apcs 9>, <&apcs 19>;

vs. for example:

-		qcom,ipc-1 = <&apcs 8 13>;
-		qcom,ipc-2 = <&apcs 8 9>;
-		qcom,ipc-3 = <&apcs 8 19>;
+		mboxes = <&apcs 13>, <&apcs 9>, <&apcs 19>;
+		mbox-names = "ipc-1", "ipc-2", "ipc-3";

But also here the name with 'ipc-N' is probably not particularly
fitting?

Please let me know your thoughts and any suggestions.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
---
Luca Weiss (2):
      dt-bindings: soc: qcom,smsm: Allow specifying mboxes instead of qcom,ipc
      soc: qcom: smsm: Support using mailbox interface

 .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smsm.yaml    | 48 ++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/soc/qcom/smsm.c                            | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ed30a4a51bb196781c8058073ea720133a65596f
change-id: 20240424-smsm-mbox-0666f35eae44

Best regards,